summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/tests/language-feature/shader-params
Commit message (Collapse)AuthorAge
* render-test: Change D3D12 default to sm_6_5 (#8320)James Helferty (NVIDIA)2025-09-02
| | | | | | | | | Changes default for render-test to sm_6_5. Since sm_6_5 is the new default, remove the -use-dxil option, add -use-dxcb option Remove -use-dxil option from all test cases. Add -use-dxcb to two tests that needed it. Fixes #7611
* Migrate render-test away from deprecated compile request API (#6514)Anders Leino2025-03-12
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | * Add a simple interface parameter test Since there's no documentation, it's nice to have a simple test case in order to experiment with this feature of the testing framework. * Add shader entry point attributes to tests * Fix specialization arguments for tests - Add some missing arguments - Rremove one extraneous argument. * Stop using deprecated compile request in render-test Use a session object instead of the deprecated compile request object. This closes issue #4760.
* Refresh of disabled WGPU tests (#5614)Anders Leino2024-11-21
| | | | | | | | | Some tests are now passing and are enabled. Other tests are still failing, but are given comments categorizing the failures. Tests in the 'Not supported in WGSL' category are also removed from the expected failures list. (Though they are still kept disabled for WebGPU, of course.) This closes #5519.
* Fix WGSL parameter block binding. (#5500)Yong He2024-11-06
| | | | | | | | | | | | | * Fix WGSL parameter block binding. * Re-enable tests. * Update failure list. * Fix entrypoint parameters. * Update tests. * Enable stat-var test.
* Enable WebGPU tests in CI (#5239)Anders Leino2024-10-15
|
* Allow implicit 'uniform' entrypoint parameters. (#4765)Yong He2024-08-01
| | | | | | | | | | | * Allow impliocit 'uniform' entrypoint parameters. * Fix. * Fix. * Fix. * Fix.
* Support parameter block in metal shader objects. (#4671)Yong He2024-07-19
| | | | | | | | | | | | | * Support parameter block in metal shader objects. * Ingore parameter block tests on devices without tier2 argument buffer. * Fix warning. * Fix texture subscript test. --------- Co-authored-by: Yong He <yhe@nvidia.com>
* Metal compute tests (#4292)skallweitNV2024-06-07
|
* Warning on lossy implicit casts. (#2367)Yong He2022-08-17
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | * Warning on bool to float conversion. * Fix test cases. * Improve. * LanguageServer: don't show constant value for non constant variables. * Fix tests. * Fix warnings in tests. Co-authored-by: Yong He <yhe@nvidia.com>
* Update gfx back-ends to handle static specialization (#1826)Tim Foley2021-04-29
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | * Update gfx back-ends to handle static specialization The main goal here is to make the D3D11, D3D12 and Vulkan back-ends support static specialization of interface types in the case where the data for the type won't "fit" in the pre-allocated space for existential values. This includes all cases where the concrete type being specialized to has resources/samplers/etc., as well as any cases where its ordinary/uniform data exceeds the space available. (Note that the CPU and CUDA targets don't need this work since they can (in theory) support arbitrary-size data in the fixed-size existential payload by using pointer indirection. Actually supporting indirection in those cases should be a distinct change) The Slang compiler already performs layout for programs that have this kind of data that doesn't "fit," and it lays them out using an idea of "pending" type layouts. Basically, a type that contains some amount of specialized interface-type fields will produce both a "primary" type layout that just covers the data for the unspecialized case, as well as "pending" type layout that describes the layout for all the extra data needed by specialization. When laying out a `ConstantBuffer<X>` or `ParameterBlocK<X>` ("CB" or "PB"), the front-end will try to place as much of that "pending" data into the layout of the buffer/block itself as is possible. That means that both CBs and PBs will be able to allocate trailing bytes for any ordinary data in the "pending" layout. PBs will be able to allocate any trailing resources/samplers into their layout, but for CBs they will spill out to be part of the pending layout for the buffer itself. In order for the back-ends to properly handle pending data, they need to *either* assume the exact layout rules used by the front-end and try to reproduce them (e.g., by iterating over binding ranges and sub-objects in the exact same order that front-end layout would enumerate them), *or* they need to respect the reflection information produced by the front-end. This change takes the latter approach, trying to make only minimal assumptions about the layout rules being used. This choice is motivated by wanting to decouple the `gfx` implementation from the compiler front-end, especially insofar as this work has made me question whether the current layout rules are the best ones possible. A common theme across all the implementations is to have a fixed-size type that can represent "binding offsets" for the chosen back-end. The offset type has fields that depend on the API-specific way bindings are indexed; e.g., for D3D11 it has offsets for CBV, SRV, UAV, and sampler bindings. This fixed-size offset type can be filled in based on Slang reflecton information, and then used to compute derived offsets with just a few add operations. The simple offset type for each API is then extended to produce an offset type that includes both the offsets for "primary" data and also the offsets for "pending" data. Most logic that traffics in offsets doesn't have to know about this more complicated representation. Making consistent use of these offsets required that I pretty much rewrite the logic that actually applies shader objects to the API state. Doing so might be lowering the efficiency of the system in the near term, but the increase in clarity was important for getting the work done, and it seems like it will also be important if/when we start trying to perform special-case optimizations around root and entry-point parameter setting. While there are many API-specific differences, we can identify a repeated pattern where many steps, whether applying parameters to the pipeline stage or constructing signatures / layouts, can be broken down into three main operations on `ShaderObject`s or their layouts: * `*AsValue()` is the core operation, and is the one used for the `ExistentialValue` case most of the time. It ignores the ordinary data in the object, and instead processes all nested binding ranges (for resources/smaplers) and sub-objects. * `*AsConstantBuffer()` handles the `ConstntBuffer<X>` case, by dealing with the implicit buffer for ordinary data (if it is needed) and then delegates to the `*AsValue()` case. * `*AsParameterBlock()` handles the `ParameterBlock<X>` case, by allocating/preparing/etc. any descriptor tables/sets that would be required for the current object/layout and then delegating to `*AsConstantBuffer()` to do the rest The idea is that by having the parameter block case delegate to the constant buffer case, which delegates to the value/existential case, we can streamline a lot of the logic so that it doesn't seem quite as full of special cases. Note: When preparing this pull request I spent a reasonable amount of time trying to clean up the D3D11 and Vulkan implementations, so they are probably the easiest to read and understand when it comes to the new code. Doing the cleanup work also helped to work out some weird corner case bugs/issues. In contrast, the D3D12 path hasn't had as much attention given to cleanliness and comments, so it really needs some attention down the line to get things into a state that is easier to understand. * fixup: remove debugging code spotted in review
* Clean up render-test handling of input (#1766)Tim Foley2021-03-25
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | The original goal of this change was to streamline the `TEST_INPUT` system by eliminating options that are no longer relevant once we have eliminated the non-shader-object execution paths. The result is more or less a re-implementation/refactor of the logic around how input is parsed and represented, that tries to set things up for a more general sytem going forward. The main changes isthat the `ShaderInputLayout` no longer tracks a simple flat list of `ShaderInputLayoutEntry` (that is a kind of pseudo-union of the various buffer/texture/value cases), and it instead uses a hierarchical representation composed of `RefObject`-derived classes to represent "values." There are several "simple" cases of values * Textures * Samplers * Uniform/ordinary data (`uniform`) * Buffers composed of uniform/ordinary data (`ubuffer`) Then there are composed/aggregate values that nest other values: * An *aggregate* value is a set of *fields* which are name/value pairs. It can be used to fill in a structure, for example. * An *array* value is a list of values for the elements of an array. It can be used to fill out an array-of-textures parameter, for example. * A combined texture/sampler value is a pair of a texture value and a sampler value (easy enough) * An *object* holds an optional type name for a shader object to allocate (it defaults to the type that is "under" the current shader cursor when binding), and a nested value that describes how to fill in the contents of that object Finally there are cases of values that are just syntactic sugar: * A `cbuffer` is just shorthand for creating an object value with a nested uniform/ordinary data value The big idea with this recursive structure is that it gives us a way to handle more arbitrary data types with name-based binding. Supporting this new capability requires changes to both how input layouts get parsed, and also how they get bound into shader objects. On the parsing side, things have been refactored a bit so that parsing isn't a single monolithic routine. The refactor also tries to make it so that the various options on an input item (e.g., the `size=...` option for textures) are only supported on the relevant type of entry (so you can't specify as many useless options that will be ignored). The bigger change to parsing is that it now supports a hierarchical structure, where certain input elements like `begin_array` can push a new "parent" value onto a stack, and subsequent `TEST_INPUT` lines will be parsed as children of that item until a matching `end` item. This approach means that we can now in principle describe arbitrary hierarchical structures as part of test input without endlessly increasing the complexity of invididual `TEST_INPUT` lines. On the binding side, we now have a central recursive operation called `assign(ShaderCursor, ShaderInputLayout::ValPtr)` that assigns from a parsed `ShaderInputLayout` value to a particular cursor. That operation can then recurse on the fields/elements/contents of whatever the cursor points to. Major open directions: * With this change it is still necessary to use `uniform` entries to set things like individual integers or `float`s and that is a little silly. It would be good to have some streamlines cases for setting individual scalar values. * Further, once we have a hierarchical representation of the values for `TEST_INPUT` lines, it becomes clear that we really ought to move to a format more like `TEST_INPUT: dstLocation = srcValue;` where `srcValue` is some kind of hierarchial expression grammar. Refactoring things in this way should make the binding logic even more clear and easy to understand. The refactored parser should make parsing hierarchical expressions easier to do in the future (even if it uses the push/pop model for now) * One detailed note is that the representation of buffers in this change is kind of a compromise. Just as an "object" value is a thin wrapper around a recursively-contained value for its "content" it seems clear that a buffer could be represented as a wrapper around a content value that could include hierarchical aggregates/objects instead of just flat binary data (this would be important for things like a buffer over a structure type that lays out different on different targets). The main problem right now with changing the representation is actually needing to compute the size of a buffer based on its content, so that can/should be addressed in a subsequent change. Details: * The base `RenderTestApp` class and the `ShaderObjectRenderTestApp` classes have been merged, since the hierarchy no longer serves any purpose. * Disabled the tess that rely on `StructuredBuffer<IWhatever>` because they aren't really supported by our current shader object implementation * Replaced used of `Uniform` and `root_constants` in `TEST_INPUT` lines with just `uniform` * Removed a bunch of uses of `stride` from `cbuffer` inputs, where it wasn't really correct/meaningful * Added the `copyBuffer()` operation to VK/D3D renderers, along with some missing `Usage` cases to support it. * Made `ShaderCursor` handle the logic to look up a name in the entry points of a root shader object, rather than just having that logic in `render-test`. (We probably need to make a clear design choice on this issue)
* Remove old code paths from render-test (#1760)Tim Foley2021-03-17
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | * Remove old code paths from render-test Historically, the `render-test` tool was using three different code paths: * One based on `gfx` and manual (non-reflection-based) parameter setting, used for OpenGL, D3D11, D3D12, and Vulkan * One for CPU that used reflection-based parameter setting but shared no code with the first * One for CUDA that used reflection-based parameter setting and shared some, but not all, code with the CPU path Recently we've updated `render-test` to include a fourth option: * Using `gfx` and the "shader object" system it exposes for a unified reflection-based parameter-setting system taht works across OpenGL, D3D11, D3D12, Vulkan, CUDA, and CPU This change removes the first three options and leaves only the single unified path. A sa result, a bunch of code in `render-test` is no longer needed, and the codebase no longer relies on things like the `IDescriptorSet`-related APIs in `gfx`. Several existing tests had to be disabled to make this change possible. Those tests will need to be audited and either re-enabled once we fix issues in the shader object system, or permanently removed if they don't test stuff we intend to support in the long run (e.g., global-scope type parameters, which aren't a clear necessity). * fixup: CUDA detection logic
* Convert more tests to use shader objects (#1659)Tim Foley2021-01-15
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | This change converts a large number of our existing tests to use the `ShaderObject` support that was added to the `gfx` layer. In many cases, tests were just updated to pass `-shaderobj` and the result Just Worked. In other cases, a `name` attribute had to be added to one or more `TEST_INPUT` lines. For tests that did not work with shader objects "out of the box," I spent a little bit of time trying to get them work, but fell back to letting those tests run in the older mode. Future changes to the infrastructure will be needed to get those additional tests working in the new path. Along with the changes to test files, the following implementation changes were made to get additional tests working: * Because the shader object mode uses explicit register bindings (from reflection), the hacky logic that was offseting `u` registers for D3D12 based on the number of render targets gets disabled (by another hack). * The "flat" reflection information coming from Slang was not correctly reporting "binding ranges" for things that consumed only uniform data (which would be everything on CUDA/CPU), so it was refactored to properly include binding ranges for anything where the type of the field/variable implied a binding range should be created (even if the `LayoutResourceKind` was `::Uniform`). * A few fixes were made to the CUDA implementation of `Renderer`, in order to get additional tests up and running. Most of these changes had to do with texture bindings, which hadn't really been tested previously. In addition, a few changes were made that were attempts at getting more tests working, but didn't actually help. These could be dropped if requested: * As a quality-of-life feature (not being used) the `object` style of `TEST_INPUT` line is upgraded to support inferring the type to use from the type of the input being set. * Any `object` shader input lines get ignored in non-shader-object mode.
* Change the policy for entry-point uniform parameters on Vulkan (#1476)Tim Foley2020-08-05
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Entry point `uniform` parameters were a feature of the original Cg and HLSL, but have not been used much in production shader code. One of our goals on Slang is to reduce the (ab)use of the global scope, so bringing entry point `uniform` parameters up to a greater level of usability is an important goal. Some policy choices about how global vs. entry-point `uniform` parameters behave have already been made, that shape decisions looking forward: * For DXBC/DXIL, it makes the most sense to follow the lead of fxc/dxc, by treating entry point `uniform` parameters as a kind of syntax sugar for global shader parameters. Any parameters of "ordinary" types are bundles up into an implicit constant buffer, and all the resources (including the implicit constant buffer) are assigned `register`s just as for globals. It is up to the application to decide how to bind those parameters via a root signature (using root descriptors, root constants, descriptor tables, local vs. global root signature, etc.) * For CPU, it makes sense to pass global vs. entry-point parameters as two different pointers, although the details of what we do for CPU are the least constrained across all current targets. * For CUDA compute, it makes the most sense to map global shader parameters to `__constant__` global data, and entry-point `uniform` parameters to kernel parameters. This choice ensures that the signature of a kernel when translated from Slang->CUDA follows the Principle of Least Surprise, at the cost of making entry-point vs. global parameters be passed via different mechanisms. * For OptiX ray tracing, it makes sense to expand on the precedent from CUDA compute: pass global parameters via global `__constant__` data (as is already expected by OptiX for whole-launch parameters), and pass entry-point `uniform` parameters via the "shader record." This establishes a precedent that for ray-tracing shaders, global-scope parameters map to the "global root signature" concept from DXR, while entry-point `uniform` parameters map to a "local root signature" or "shader record." * For Vulkan ray tracing, the precedent from OptiX then argues that entry-point `uniform` parameters should map to the Vulkan "shader record" concept (and thus cannot support things like resource types). * The remaining interesting case is what to do for non-ray-tracing shaders on Vulkan. The dev team agrees that the most reasonable choice to make for non-ray-tracing Vulkan shaders is to map entry-point `uniform` parameters to "push constants." In particular, this makes it easy to express the case of a compute kernel with direct parameters of ordinary/value types in the way that will be implemented most efficiently. The big picture is then that a kernel like: ```hlsl void computeMain(uniform float someValue) { ... } ``` will map to output GLSL like: ```glsl layout(push_constant) uniform { float someValue; } U; void main() { ... } ``` If the user really wanted a constant-buffer binding to be created instead, they can easily change their input to make the buffer explicit: ```hlsl struct Params { float someValue; } void computeMain(uniform ConstantBuffer<Params> params) { ... } ``` (Forcing the user to be explicit about the desire for a buffer here creates a nice symmetry between Vulkan and CUDA; in the first case the user sets up the data in host memory and passes it to the GPU by copy, while in the second case the user must allocate and set up a device-memory buffer for the data. This symmetry extends to D3D if the application chooses to map entry-point `uniform` parameters to root constants.) This change implements logic in the "parameter binding" part of the Slang compiler to make sure that entry-point `uniform` parameters are wrapped up in a push-constant buffer rather than an ordinary constant buffer for non-ray-tracing shaders on Vulkan (and in a shader record "buffer" for the ray-tracing case). The majority of the actual work was in adding support for root/push constants to the test framework and the graphics API abstraction it uses. To be clear about that support: * Root constant ranges are (perhaps confusingly) treated as a new kind of "slot" that can appear on a descriptor set. This choice ensures that the implicit numbering of registers/spaces used by the back-ends can account for these ranges correctly. * The `TEST_INPUT` lines are extended to allow a `root_constants` case that behaves more or less like `cbuffer` * The CPU and CUDA paths can treat a `root_constants` input identically to a `cbuffer`. They already allocate the actual buffers based on reflection, and just use `cbuffer` as a directive that causes bytes to be copied in. * On D3D12 and Vulkan, a descriptor set allocates a `List<char>` to hold the bytes of root constant data assigned into it, and these bytes are flushed to the command list when the table is actually bound (usually right before rendering). * On D3D11, a descriptor set treats a root constant range more or less like a constant buffer range (with a single buffer), except that it also automatically allocates a buffer to hold the data. Assigning "root constant" data automatically copies it into that buffer. The small number of tests that used entry-point `uniform` parameters of ordinary types were updated to use the new `root_constant` input type, and the bugs that surfaced were fixed. A new test to confirm that entry-point `uniform` parameters map to the shader record for VK ray tracing was added. An important but technically unrelated change is the removal of the `DescriptorSetImpl::Binding` type and related function from the Vulkan implementation of `Renderer`. That type was created to ensure that objects that are bound into a descriptor set don't get released while the descriptor set is still alive, but the implementation relied on a complicated linear search to check for existing bindings, which could create a performance issue for descriptor sets that include large arrays of descriptors. The new implementation makes use of the approach already present in the various `Renderer` implementations (including the Vulkan one) for assigning ranges in a descriptor set a flat/linear index for where their pertinent data is to be bound. As a result, the Vulkan `DescriptorSetImpl` now uses a single flat array of `RefPtr`s to track bound objects, and has no need for linear search when binding. Co-authored-by: Yong He <yonghe@outlook.com>
* Handle case of no global parameters for CPU/CUDA (#1457)Tim Foley2020-07-24
| | | | | | | The IR pass that introduces an explicit `KernelContext` for the CPU/CUDA back-ends was also responsible for adding an explicit parameter to the kernel entry point to receive the constant buffer (pointer) with all the global uniform parameters. However, if there were no global uniform parameters, this parameter wasn't getting introduced, which changed the signature/ABI of the generated entry point function. This change makes it so that the pass unconditionally adds a parameter. In the case where there are no global uniforms it just adds a `void*` parameter that never gets used. In order to avoid future regressions, this change also adds a test case to confirm that things work correctly when a kernel has only entry-point parameters and no global parameters.
* Add support for global uniform shader parameters (#1433)Tim Foley2020-07-08
* Adding support for global uniform shader parameters This change adds support for Slang programmers to declare shader parameters of "ordinary" types at global scope: ```hlsl uniform float gScaleFactor; void main() { ... *= gScaleFactor; ... } ``` The generated HLSL/GLSL/DXIL/SPIR-V output will be something along the lines of: ```hlsl struct GlobalParams { float gScaleFactor; } cbuffer globalParams { GlobalParams globalParams; } void main() { ... *= globalParams.gScaleFactor; ... } ``` The binding information used for the implicit `globalParams` constant buffer will be determined by the existing implicit parameter binding logic (which already had support for this kind of transformation). The reason this change is being pursued right now is because it is one step toward removing the implicit `KernelContext` type that is used to wrap the generated code for our CPU and CUDA C++ targets. Handling global-scope parameters of ordinary type requires an IR pass that synthesizes the `GlobalParams` structure type above, and that step ends up removing the need for the similar `UniformState` structure that was being used in the CPU/CUDA emit logic. A more detailed guide to the changes included follows: * The diagnostic for a global-scope variable that is implicitly a shader parameter was kept, but changed to a warning. Users can opt out of the warning by decorating their parameter as a `uniform` (since that keyword is already being used to mark entry-point parameters that should be treated as uniform shader parameters). * To simplify the task of finding the global shader parameters, the `CLikeSourceEmitter` type has been given an `m_irModule` member. The previous emit logic for `UniformState` was having to do a roundabout solution involving the `EmitAction`s to deal with not having direct access to the module. * Removed a few dead declarations in the emit logic (related to a much earlier point where emit was based on the AST instead of the IR). * Made the computation of type names in C++ emit take into account `ConstantBuffer<T>` and `ParameterBlock<T>`. As far as I can tell, these were being handled with some special-case hacks in the emit logic instead of being supported more fundamentally. It might actually be good to pass these through as `ConstantBuffer<T>` and `ParameterBlock<T>` in the C++ output, and allow the prelude to customize their translation (defaulting to defining them as `T*`). * Removed the special-case C++ emit logic for references to global shader parameters. There are now at most two global shader parameters to deal with, and the default emit logic (referring to them by name) does the Right Thing. * Changed the handling of entry points for C++ (both CPU and CUDA) so that it handles the bundled-up shader paameters for the global and entry-point scopes the same way. The main complication here is OptiX, where parameter data is passed very differently than it is for CUDA compute kernels. * Reverted changes to `ir-entry-point-uniforms` that had made its logic depend on the compilation target. The parameter binding logic was already responsible for deciding if a given target needed to wrap up its entry-point parameters in a constant buffer, and the IR pass was respecting that layout information. The current workaround had been removing the `ConstantBuffer<T>` indirection from this IR pass for CPU/CUDA, but then reintroducing the same indirection later on in the emit step. * Added an explicit IR pass with the task of collecting global-scope parameters of uniform/ordinary type and packaging them up into a `struct`, and then optionally packaging that `struct` up in a constant buffer. This pass bases its decisions on the IR layout information that was already computed, so it should match whatever policy choices were made at the layout level. * Changed the "key" operand on IR `struct` layout information to not assume an `IRStructKey`. The problem here is that the global scope gets a `StructTypeLayout` to represent its members, and this is convenient (rather than having to always special-case logic that handles the global scope), but the "fields" of that struct are global variables which do not have `IRStructKey`s associated with them. The simplest solution is to use the variables themselves as the keys, which required removing the assumption in the IR encoding. * Updated the IR layout process to compute a layout for the global scope of an entire program, and to attach that to the `IRModule` via a decoration. Updated the IR linking process to carry through that decoration to the linked output. This is necessary so that the IR pass that transforms global parameters can access the global-scope layout information. An important concern with this approach is that the contents and layout of the monolithic `GlobalParams` structure depends on the exact set of modules that were linked (and the order in which they were specified, in some cases). This isn't really a new thing with this change, but it becomes more important as we start to think of how to generalize things to better support separate compilation and linking. There are changes that can (and should) be made to the way that IR layouts are computed for programs (e.g., so that we compute layout per-module and then combine them rather than as a whole-program step). In this case, the problem of forming the combined/linked global layout can be moved down the IR level and not be reliant on AST-level information. Just changing the way layout and linking interact would not change the fundamental problem that global shader parameters as they currently exist in Slang/HLSL/GLSL are not readily compatible with true separate compilation. We either need to find a solution strategy that we can apply to allow existing shaders to work with separate compilation *or* we need to incrementally work toward removing support for global-scope shader parameters in favor of explicit entry-point parameters in all cases. * fixup: missing files * fixup: comment the new code