|
|
The actual definitions that got moved into the stdlib here are pretty few:
* `clip()`
* `cross()`
* `dxx()`, `ddy()` etc.
* `degrees()`
* `distance()`
* `dot()`
* `faceforward()`
The meat of the change is infrastructure changes required to support these new declarations
* Generic versions of the standard operators (e.g., `operator+`) were added that are generic for a type `T` that implements the matching `__Builtin`-prefixed interface. An open question is whether we can now drop the non-generic versions in favor of just having these generic operators.
* A `__BuiltinLogicalType` interface was added to capture the commonality between integers and `bool`
* `__BuiltinArithmeticType` was extended so that implementations must support initialization from an `int`
* `__BuiltinFloatingPointType` was extended to require an accessor that returns the value of pi for the given type, and the concrete floating-point types were extended to provide definitions of this value.
* It turns out that our logic for checking if two functions have the same signature (and should thus count as redeclarations/redefinitions) wasn't taking generic constraints into account at all. That was fixed with a stopgap solution that checks if the generic constraints are pairwise identical, but I didn't implement the more "correct" fix that would require canonicalizing the constraints.
* When doing overload resolution and considering potential callees, logic was added so that a non-generic candidate should always be selected over a generic one (generally the Right Thing to do), and also so that a generic candidate with fewer parameters will be selected over one with more (an approximation of the much more complicated rule we'd ideally have).
* The formatting of declarations/overloads for "ambiguous overload" errors was fleshed out a bit to include more context (the "kind" of declaration where appropriate, the return type for function declarations) and to properly space thing when outputting specialization of operator overloads that end with `<` (so that we print `func < <int>(int, int)` instead of just `func <<int,int>(int,int)`).
* The core lookup routines were heavily refactored and reorganized to try to make them bottleneck more effectively so that all paths handle all the nuances of inheritance, extensions, etc.
* Because of the refactoring to lookup logic, the semantic checking logic related to checking if a type conforms to an interface was updated to be driven based on the `Type` that is supposed to be conforming, rather than a `DeclRef` to the type's declaration. This allows it to use the type-based lookup entry point and eliminates one special-case entry point for lookup.
In addition to the various core changes, this change also refactors some of the existing stdlib code to favor writing more things in actual Slang syntax, and less in C++ code that uses `StringBuilder` to construct the Slang syntax. There is a lot more that could be done along those lines, but even pushing this far is showing that the current approach that `slang-generate` takes for how to separate meta-level C++ and Slang code isn't really ideal, so a revamp of the generator code is probably needed before I continue pushing.
One surprising casualty of the refactoring of lookup is that we no longer have the `lookedUpDecls` field in `LookupResult`. That field probably didn't belong there anyway, but the role it served was important. The idea of `lookedUpDecls` was to avoid looking up in the same interface more than once in cases where a type might have a "diamond" inheritance pattern. Removing that field doesn't appear to affect correctness of any of our existing tests, but by adding a specific test for "diamond" inheritance I could see that the refactoring introduced a regression and made looking up a member inherited along multiple paths ambiguous.
Rather than add back `lookedUpDecls` I went for a simpler (but arguably even hackier) solution where when ranking candidates from a `LookupResult` we check for identical `DeclRef`s and arbitrarily favor one over the other. One complication that arises here is that when comparing `DeclRef`s inherited along different paths they might have a `ThisTypeSubstitution` for the same type, but with different subtype witnesses (because different inheritance paths could lead to different transitive subtype witnesses: e.g., `A : B : D` and `A : C : D`).
|
