| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age |
|---|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
* Prefixing source files in source/slang with slang-
* Prefix source in source/slang with slang- prefix.
* Rename core source files with slang- prefix.
* Update project files.
* Fix problems from automatic merge.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
* Split front- and back-ends
This change is a major refactor of several of the types that provide the behind-the-scenes implementation of the public C API.
The goal of this refactor is primarily to allow for future API services that let the user operate both the front- and back-ends of the compiler in a more complex fashion.
For example, as user should be able to compile a bunch of source code into modules, look up types, functions, etc. in those modules, specialize generic types/functions to the types they've looked up, and then finally request target code to be gernerated for specialized entry points.
The back-end code generation they trigger should re-use the front-end compilation work (parsing, semantic checking, IR generation) that was already performed.
The most visible change is that `CompileRequest` has been split up into several smaller types that take responsibility for parts of what it did:
* The `Linkage` type owns the storage for `import`ed modules, and well as the `TargetRequest`s that represent code-generation targets. The intention is that an application could use a single `Linkage` for the duration of its runtime (so long as it was okay with the memory usage), so that each `import`ed module only gets loaded once. For now, this type needs to manage the search paths, file system, and source manager, because of its responsibility for loading files.
* A `FrontEndCompileRequest` owns the stuff related to parsing, semantic checking, and initial IR generation. This most notably includes the `TranslationUnitRequest`s and the `FrontEndEntryPointRequest`s (which used to be just `EntryPointRequest`s). It's main job is to produce AST and IR modules for each translation unit, and to find and validate the entry points. The front-end request does *not* interact with generic arguments for global or entry-point generic parameters.
* The main output of both `import` operations and front-end translation units is the `Module` type, which is just a simple container for both the AST module (to service the reflection/layout APIs, and also for semantic checking of code that `import`s the module) and the IR module (for linking and code generation). This type captures the commonalities between the old `LoadedModule` (which is now just an alias for `Module`) and `TranslationUnitRequest` (which now owns a `Module`).
* The secondary output of front-end compilation is a `Program`, which comprises a list of referenced `Module`s and validated `EntryPoint`s that will be used together. Layout and code generation both need a `Program` to tell them what modules and entry points will be used together (we don't want to just code-gen everythin that has ever been loaded into the linakge). The `Program`s created by the front-end do not include generic arguments, so they may provide incomplete layout information and/or be unsuitable for code generation.
* A `BackEndCompileRequest` owns stuff related to turning a `Program` into output kernels for the targets of a `Linkage`. Most of the data it owns beyond the `Program` to be compiled is minor, so this is a good candidate for demotion from a heap-allocated object to just a `struct` of options that gets passed around.
* The `CompileRequestBase` type is an attempt to wrap up the common functionality of both front-end and back-end compile requests. Most of it is just exposing the availability of a linkage and `DiagnosticSink`, so this type is a good candidate for subsequent removal. The main interesting thing it has is the flags related to dumping and validation of IR, so there is probably a good refactoring still to be made around deciding how options should be handled going forward.
* Behind the scenes, the `Program` type is set up to handle some level of on-line compilation and layout work. The `Program` knows the `Linkage` it belongs to, and allows for a `TargetProgram` to be looked up based on a specific `TargetRequest`. A `TargetProgram` then allows layout information and compiled kernel code to be asked for on-demand, in order to support eventual "live" compilation scenarios.
* The `EndToEndCompileRequest` type is a composition/coordination type that replaces the old `CompileRequest` in a way that uses the services of the various other types. It owns a few pieces of state that only make sense in the context of an end-to-end compile (e.g., there is really no way to "pass through" code when the front- and back-ends are run separately) or a command-line compile (everything to do with specifying output paths for files is really just for the benefit of `slangc`, and might even be moved there over time).
* One important detail is that the `EndToEndCompilRequest` owns all of the string-based generic arguments for both global and entry-point generic parameters. The logic in `check.cpp` for dealing with those arguments has been heavily refactored to separate out the parsings steps that are specific to end-to-end compilation with string-based type arguments, and the semantic checking steps that result in a specialized `Program` (which can be exposed through new APIs that aren't tied to end-to-end compilation).
It is perhaps not surprising that this change had a lot of consequences, so I'll briefly run over some of the main categories of changes required:
* I changed the way that global generic arguments are passed via API (use `spSetGlobalGenericArgs` instead of the generic arguments for `spAddEntryPointEx`, which are not just for entry-point generics), which has been a change that we've needed for a long time. This is technically a breaking API change, although we should have very few client applications that care about it.
* A bunch of places that used to take "big" objects like `CompileRequest` now just take the sub-pieces they care about (e.g., a function might have only needed a `Linkage` and a `DiagnosticSink`). This makes many subroutines or "context" struct types more generally useful, at the cost of taking more parameters.
* In a few cases the conceptually clean separation of the layers breaks down (often for edge-case or compatibility features), and so we may pass along additional objects that are allowed to be null, but are used when present. A big example of this is how the back-end code generation routines accept an `EndToEndCompileRequest` that is optional, and only used to check whether "pass through" compilation is needed. We should probably look into cleaning this kind of logic up over time so that we don't need to violate the apparent separation of phases of compilation.
* In cases where separation of layers was being broken for the sake of GLSL features, I went ahead and ripped them out, since all of that should be dead code anyway.
* In many cases I increased the encapsulation of data in the core types to help track down use sites and make sure they are following invariants better.
* In cases where code was doing, e.g., `context->shared->compileRequest->session->getThing()` I have tried to introduce convenience routines so that the usage site is just `context->getThing()` to improve encapsulation and allow changes to be made more easily going forward.
* The `noteInternalErrorLoc` functionality was moved off of the compile request and into `DiagnosticSink`, since that is the one type you can rely on having around when you want to note an internal error. We may consider going forward if (and how) it should reset the counter used for noting locations on internal errors.
* A few APIs now take `DiagnosticSink*` arguments where they didn't before, and as a result some public APIs need to create `DiagnosticSink`s to pass in, before going ahead and ignoring the messages. In the future there should be variations of these APIs that accept an `ISlangBlob**` parameter for the output.
* fixup: missing include for compilers with accurate template checking (non-VS)
* fixup: review feedback
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
* Allow entry points to have explicit generic parameters
Prior to this change, the Slang implementation required users to use global `type_param` declarations in order to specialize a full shader. For example:
```hlsl
type_param L : ILight;
ParameterBlock<L> gLight;
[shader("fragment")]
float4 fs(...)
{ ... gLight.doSomething() ... }
```
With this change we can rewrite code like the above using explicit generics, plus the ability to have `uniform` entry-point parameters:
```hlsl
[shader("fragment")]
float4 fs<L : ILight>(
uniform ParameterBlock<L> light,
...)
{ ... light.doSomething() ... }
```
Having this support in place should make it possible for us to eliminate global generic type parameters and the complications they cause (both at a conceptual and implementation level).
The most central and visible piece of the change is that `EntryPointRequest` now holds a `DeclRef<FuncDecl>` instead of just ` RefPtr<FuncDecl>`, which allows it to refer to a specialization of a generic function.
Various places in the code that refer to the `EntryPointRequest::decl` member now use a `getFuncDecl()` or `getFuncDeclRef()` method as appropriate (see `compiler.h`).
In order to fill in the new data, the `findAndValidateEntryPoint` function has been greaterly overhauled.
The changes to its operation include:
* The by-name lookup step for the entry point function has been adapted to accept either a function or a generic function.
* The generic argument strings provided by API or command line are no longer parsed all the way to `Type`s, but instead just to `Expr`s in the first pass.
* There are now two cases for checking the global generic arguments against their matching parameters. The first case is the new one, where we plug the generic argument `Expr`s into the explicit generic parameters of an entry point (that case re-uses existing semantic checking logic). The second case is the pre-existing code for dealing with global generic type arguments.
The `lower-to-ir.cpp` logic for hadling entry points then had to be extended. Making it deal with a full `DeclRef` instead of just a `Decl` was the easy part (just call `emitDeclRef` instead of `ensureDecl`).
The more interesting bits were:
* We need to carefully add the `IREntryPointDecoration` to the nested function and not the generic in the case where we have a generic entry point. There is a handy `getResolvedInstForDecorations` that can extract the return value for an IR generic so that we can decorate the right hting.
* We need to make sure that in the case where we emit a `specialize` instruction (which normally wouldn't get a linkage decoration), we attach an `[export(...)]` decoration to it with the mangled name of the decl-ref, so that it can be found during the linking step.
The IR linking step is then slightly more complicated because the mangled entry point name could either refer directly to an `IRFunc` or to a `specialize` instruction for a generic entry point. The logic was refactored to first clone the entry point symbol without concern for which case it is (the old code was specific to functions), and then *if* the result is a `specialize` instruction, we attempt to run generic specialization on-demand.
That on-demand specialization is a bit of a kludge, but it deals with the fact that all the downstream passing only expect to see an `IRFunc`. A future cleanup might try to split out that specialization step into its own pass, which ends up being a limited form of the specialization pass.
Since I was already having to touch a lot of the code around IR linking, I went ahead and refactored the signature of the operations. I eliminated the need for the caller to create, pass in, and then destroy an `IRSpecializationState` (really an IR *linking* state), and replaced it with a structure local to the pass (that data structure was a remnant of an older approach in the compiler), and then also renamed the main operation to `linkIR` to reflect what it is doing in our conceptual flow.
Smaller changes made along the way include:
* Refactored `visitGenericAppExpr` to create a subroutine `checkGenericAppWithCheckedArgs` so that it can be used by the entry-point validation logic described above).
* Refactored the declarations around the IR passes in `emitEntryPoint()` (`emit.cpp`), to show that things are more self-contained than they used to be (e.g., that the `TypeLegalizationContext` is now only needed by one pass).
* Refactored the generic specialization code so that there is a stand-along free function that can perform specialization on a `specialize` instruction without all the other context being required. This is only to support the limited specialization that needs to be done as part of linking.
* Updated the `global-type-param.slang` test to actually test entry-point generic parameters. In a later pass we can/should rework all the tests/examples for global type parameters over to use explicit entry-point generic parameters (at which point we should rename the tests as well). For now I am leaving thigns with just one test case, with the expectation that bugs will be found and ironed out as we expand to more tests.
* fixup
* Fixup: don't leave entry-point decorations on stuff we don't want to keep
The IR `[entryPoint]` decoration is effectively a "keep this alive" decoration, which means that attaching it to something we don't intend to keep around can lead to Bad Things.
The approach to generic entry points was attaching `[entryPoint]` to the underlying `IRFunc` because that seemed to make sense, but that meant that the `specialize` instruction at global scope scould instantiate that generic and then keep it alive, even if the resulting function wouldn't be valid according to the language rules.
As a quick fix, I'm attaching `[entryPoint]` to the `specialize` instruction instead in such cases, and then re-attaching it to the result of explicit specialization during linking.
* Port most of remaining test and rename global type parameters
This change ports as many as possible of the existing tests for global type parameters over to use entry-point generic parameters instead. For the most part this is a mechanical change.
A few test cases remain using global generic parameters, as does the `model-viewer` example application.
The reason for this is that the shaders have either or both the following features:
* A vertex and fragment shader that can/shold agree on their parameters
* A type declaration (e.g., a `struct`) that is dependent on one of the generic type parameters
In these cases, it would really only make sense to switch to explicit parameters once we support shader entry points nested inside of a `struct` type, so that we can use an outer generic `struct` as a mechanism to scope the entry points and other type-dependent declrations.
Since global-scope type parameters need to persist for at least a bit longer, I went ahead and renamed all the use sites over to use `type_param` for consistency.
|
|
|
* Refactor several IR passes
This change takes some IR passes that lived together in `ir.cpp` and moves them into their own files to improve clarity.
In most cases these were passes introduced early in the life of the IR, so that it didn't seem like a big deal to have them all in one file, but now that `ir.cpp` has grown unwieldly this seems like an important cleanup to make.
To give a quick rundown of the passes involved:
* The IR "linking" step has been pulled out to `ir-link.{h,cpp}`. This code for this pass is pretty much identical to what was in `ir.cpp`, and no attempt has been made to clean up or refactor it in the current change.
* The GLSL legalization step has been pulled out to `ir-glsl-legalize.{h,cpp}`. This used to be invoked directly from the linking step, but has been made a new top-level pass invoked from `emit.cpp`. Just like with the linking, the code in the new file is just a copy-paste of what was in `ir.cpp`, and no attempt at cleanup has been made. Also note that it might be a good idea to move this pass later in the overall sequence, but this PR doesn't attempt to do that as it could change results.
* The generic specialization step has been pulled out to `ir-specialize.{h,cpp}`. The file name does not explicitly reference *generic* specialization because I anticipate this pass having to perform other kinds of specialization as well. The code in this case amounts to a heavy cleanup/refactoring pass and thus deserves careful scrutiny. The reason for the cleanup is that the generic specialization step used to be part of the "linking" step long ago, and continued to share infrastructure with it long after that stopped making sense. The newly cleaned up pass has much simpler logic that should be easy enough to follow from the comments.
* In order to reduce code dulication, the IR "cloning" part of the `ir-specialize-resources.{h,cpp}` pass was pulled into its own files (`ir-clone.{h,cpp}`) that both the generic specialization step and the resource-based specialization step now share.
The remaining changes then pertain to deleting a bunch of code out of `ir.cpp` and adding the new files to the build.
The only test that needed updating was `vkray/raygen`, where some subtle ordering change in the refactored generic specialization logic has lead to the relative order of the specialized `TraceRay` and `saturate` functions beind reversed.
* fixup: typo in assert
* fixup: typos in comments
|
