diff options
| author | Tim Foley <tfoley@nvidia.com> | 2017-07-14 12:00:29 -0700 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Tim Foley <tfoley@nvidia.com> | 2017-07-14 12:00:29 -0700 |
| commit | f4ac13d6718d6433f69eb21311110c8225a95aee (patch) | |
| tree | fb6ab85174f2f630dd49910bc69bb23309f9eee0 /source/slang/lower.cpp | |
| parent | d9366db8993c566fbb0af780c13db438dbf74022 (diff) | |
Adjust type layout when parameter block constains member using the same resource
If we have something like to following in HLSL:
cbuffer C { Texture2D t; ... }
and we are compiling to GLSL, then both `C` and `C.t` consume the same kind of resource (a descriptor-table slot).
The way reflection was working right now, querying the index of `C` would return its binding (let's say it is `4` just to be concrete) and then a query on `C::t` would give its offset, which was being computed as `0` because it is the first field in the logical `struct` type.
That obviously leads to bad math and requires some subtle `+1`s in cases to get things right (e.g., when scalaring during lowering, I had to carefully add one in some cases).
It is unreasonable to expect users to deal with this.
This commit changes it so that the offset of field `C::t` is `1` so that hopefully more things Just Work.
The special-case logic in lowering is now gone.
One important catch here is that this pretty much only works in the case where the element type of a parameter block is a `struct` type (which is really all that makes sense right now).
If we ever want to generalize this in the future, then it will probably be necessary to change the `TypeLayout` case for parameter blocks to store a `VarLayout` for the element, rather than just a `TypeLayout`.
Diffstat (limited to 'source/slang/lower.cpp')
| -rw-r--r-- | source/slang/lower.cpp | 35 |
1 files changed, 0 insertions, 35 deletions
diff --git a/source/slang/lower.cpp b/source/slang/lower.cpp index c7278201a..caa1ab075 100644 --- a/source/slang/lower.cpp +++ b/source/slang/lower.cpp @@ -1828,25 +1828,6 @@ struct LoweringVisitor needsOffset = true; break; } - - // Even if the base offset of the parent is zero, we may still - // need to offset the child, because the parent consumes a - // resources of the same kind... - if (primaryVarLayout->typeLayout->type->As<UniformParameterBlockType>()) - { - switch (rr.kind) - { - default: - break; - - case LayoutResourceKind::ConstantBuffer: - case LayoutResourceKind::DescriptorTableSlot: - needsOffset = true; - break; - } - if (needsOffset) - break; - } } } if (needsOffset) @@ -1867,22 +1848,6 @@ struct LoweringVisitor { newResInfo->index += parentInfo->index; newResInfo->space += parentInfo->space; - - // Very special-case hack to deal with the case where the parent - // itself consumes a resources of the same type as the field. - if (primaryVarLayout->typeLayout->type->As<UniformParameterBlockType>()) - { - switch (resInfo.kind) - { - default: - break; - - case LayoutResourceKind::ConstantBuffer: - case LayoutResourceKind::DescriptorTableSlot: - newResInfo->index += 1; - break; - } - } } } |
