| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
This commit addresses issue #275
This commit includes following changes:
1. legalize function parameter IRParam instructions
2. legalize function parameter types in IRFuncType
3. legalize call sites (IRCall) with proper arguments
4. legalize local vars that has a mixed resource type.
|
|
* Don't auto-enable IR use for compute tests
The `COMPARE_COMPUTE` and `COMPARE_RENDER_COMPUTE` test fixtures were set up to always enable the `-use-ir` flag on Slang, which precludes having any tests that confirm functionality on the old non-IR path (which is still required by our main customer).
This change adds the `-xslang -use-ir` flags explicitly to any compute test cases that left them out, and makes the fixture no longer add it by default.
* Continue building out parameter block support
The initial front-end logic for parameter blocks was already added, but they are still missing a bunch of functionality. This change addresses some of the known issues:
- Bug fix: don't try to emit HLSL `register` bindings for variables that consume whole register spaces/sets
- Overhaul type layout logic so that it can make decisions based on a given code generation target (currently passed in as a `TargetRequest`), which allows us to decide whether or not a parameter block should get its own register set on a per-target basis.
- Always use a register space/set for Vulkan
- Never use a register space/set for HLSL SM 5.0 and lower
- By default, don't use register spaces/sets for HLSL output
- Add a command-line flag and some "target flags" to enable register-space usage for D3D targets
- Hackily add initial support for parameter blocks in the AST-to-AST path
- This just blindly lowers `ParameterBlock<T>` to `T`, which shouldn't quite work
- A more complete overhaul will probably need to wait until the AST-to-AST legalization is changed to use the `LegalType`s from the IR legalization pass.
- Add a compute-based test case to actually run code using parameter blocks
- This file runs test cases both with and without the IR
|
|
* IR: Add support for break and continue statements
The front-end is already doing the work of connecting this statements to their "parent" statement, so we just needed to build a map from the `Stmt*` to the corresponding `IRBlock*`s to use for break/continue when outputting any loop statement, and then look up in the map for the branch target when outputting a break/continue.
When we get around to adding `switch` statements, the same pattern should work just fine.
I also added support for `do/while` statements in IR codegen, and made sure to exercise those in one of the test cases I added.
There is also an unrelated IR codegen fix for when there is a "bound subscript" on the RHS of an assignment.
* IR: fix handling of do/while and continue
Thanks to @csyonghe for pointing out my mistake in the earlier commit.
I implemented `continue` for `do/while` loops incorrectly, branching to the head of the loop instead of the loop test.
I'll try to blame this mistake on the fact that I never use `do/while` loops because I think they are awful. :)
The fix for that issue wasn't too bad (see `lower-to-ir.cpp`) but it surfaces a much more serious issue: I wasn't actually implementing `continue` correctly *at all* when it comes to generating HLSL/GLSL from the IR (I can't easily make an excuse for that one).
The basic issue at the heart of this is that given an input statement like:
```
for(int ii = 0; ii < N; ii = doSomething(ii))
{ ... }
```
The continue clause (`ii = doSomething(ii)`) could expand into many instructions (across multiple blocks, if we inline), and there is in general no guarantee when we are done that we can package up that code as an expression and spit out a new `for` loop (the same basic argument applies to a `do { ... } while(someComplexExpression())`.
So, if we assume that in general we have to generate a full *statement* for the `continue` clause, what can we emit?
- We could try to "outline" the continue code into its own function, so that we can call it from an expression. That could work, but has high implementation complexity.
- We could introduce additional `bool` variables for control flow, outputting something like:
```
bool useContinueBlock = false;
for(;;) {
if(useContinueBlock) { <CONTINUE CODE>; }
useContinueBlock = true;
<LOOP TEST>
<LOOP BODY>
}
```
This works but user might balk at the extra variable we introduce.
- We could duplicate the code at each continue site. That is, we emit the loop as:
```
for(;;) {
<LOOP TEST>
<LOOP BODY>
<CONTINUE CODE>
}
```
but then whenever we'd like to emit `continue;` we instead emit `{ <CONTINUE CODE>; continue; }`.
This doesn't introduce any extra variables, but it causes code duplication (limited, if we don't have too many `continue` sites, and the continue clause is small - which are the common cases).
When I was initially working on the IR codegen I picked that last option just because it is what `fxc` seems to do, but I neglected to actually *implement* the special-case codegen for a `continue` instruction. This change addresses that (see `emit.cpp`).
Finally, once things were fixed the `continue` test case produced the results Yong told me to expect, but it also produced a warning from the downstream HLSL compiler ("hey, your loop doesn't ever actually *loop*!"), so I reworked the test back to one that actually loops (but still tests `continue`).
As a final aside in this essay of a commit message: the current IR representation of control flow uses special-case instructions for various cases of unconditional branch (and two variations on `if`), but these are not strictly necessary, and a future change will hopefully clean it up. The biggest catch in doing that is that it will require the IR->source codegen to carefully track which blocks represent which kinds of branch targets in context (e.g., you can't assume that a `continue` that nees the special handling above will appear as a distinct kind of instruction).
|
|
- Add definition of `discard` instruction
- A `discard` is a terminator instruction, just like `returnVoid`
- Lower `DiscardStmt` in AST to a `discard` instruction in the IR
- Emit `discard` instruction as a `discard;` statement when emitting HLSL/GLSL
- Add a test case using the "graphics compute" mode that tests discard. The test writes to one entry in a UAV before doing a conditional (always true at runtime) discard, and then writes to another entry; we expect to see the results of the first write, but not the second.
|
|
* improve diagnostic messages and prevent fatal errors from crashing the compiler.
* fix top level exception catching.
* spelling fix
* change wording of invalidSwizzleExpr diagnostic
* add speculative GenericsApp expr parsing
* add new test case of cascading generics call.
* Fixing bugs in compiling cascaded generic function calls.
Add implementation of DeclaredSubTypeWitness::SubstituteImpl()
This is not needed by the type checker, but needed by IR specialization. When input source contains cascading generic function call, the arguments to `specialize` instruction is currently represented as a substitution. The arg values of this subsittution can be a `DeclaredSubTypeWitness` when a generic function uses one of its generic parameter to specialize another generic function. When the top level generics function is being specialized, this substitution argument, which is a `DeclaredSubTypeWitness`, needs to be substituted with the witness that used to specialize the top level function in the specialized specialize instruction as well.
* add a test case for cascading generic function call.
* parser bug fix
* fixes #255
* add test case for issue #255
* Generate missing `specialize` instruction when calling a generic method from an interface constraint.
When calling a generic method via an interface, we should be generating the following ir:
...
f = lookup_interface_method(...)
f_s = specailize(f, declRef)
...
This commit fixes this `emitFuncRef` function to emit the needed `specialize` instruction.
* fixes #260
This fix follows the second apporach in the disucssion. It generated mangled name for specialized functions by appending new substitution type names to the original mangled name.
* Disabling removing and re-inserting specailized functions in getSpecalizeFunc()
I am not sure why it is needed, it seems HLSL and GLSL backends are generating forward declarations anyways, so the order of functions in IRModule shouldn't matter.
* cleanup and complete test cases.
* fix warnings
|
|
This is currently only useful for `struct` types.
I implemented a special-case exception so that the auto-generated `struct` types used for `cbuffer` members don't show their internal name.
I did *not* implement any logic to avoid returning the name `vector` for a vector type, etc., since they are all `DeclRefType`s and it seemed easiest to just let the user access information they can't really use.
|
|
|
|
- During IR emit, treat a "select" expression (`?:` operator) like any other `InvokeExpr`, since it will have an `__intrinsic_op` modifier attached to turn it into a `select` instruction.
- During HLSL/GLSL emit from IR, turn a `select` instruction into a `?:` expression
- Also add support for the `neg` instruction during HLSL/GLSL emit
Note that right now we are assuming HLSL semantics for `?:` where it does not short-circuit. Correctly handling the GLSL case would require going back to special-case codegen for `SelectExpr`, but we can cross that bridge when we come to it.
|
|
The test case had previously been calling `GroupBarrierWithGroupSync` as if it was a special-cased instruction, but now it is just calling it as an ordinary (intrinsic) function.
I haven't removed the now-useless instruction, but it would be a good cleanup to go through and eliminate all the instruction cases we aren't using in the near future.
|
|
* Rename existing ParameterBlock to ParameterGroup
We are planning to add a new `ParameterBlock<T>` type, which maps to the notion of a "parameter block" as used in the Spire research work.
Unfortunately, the compiler codebase already uses the term `ParameterBlock` as catch-all to encompass all of HLSL `cbuffer`/`tbuffer` and GLSL `uniform`/`buffer`/`in`/`out` blocks (all of which are lexical `{}`-enclosed blocks that define parameters...).
This change instead renames all of the existing concepts over to `ParameterGroup`, which isn't an ideal name, but at least doesn't directly overlap the new terminology or any existing terminology.
The new `ParameterBlockType` case will probably be a subclass of `ParameterGroupType`, since it is a logical extension of the underlying concept.
* Add Shader Model 5.1 profiles
The HLSL `register(..., space0)` syntax is only allowed on "SM5.1" and later profiles (which is supported by the newer version of `d3dcompiler_47.dll` that comes with the Win10 SDK, but not the older version of `d3dcompiler_47.dll` - good luck figuring out which you have!).
This change adds those profiles to our master list of profiles, and nothing else.
* First pass at support for `ParameterBlock<T>`
- Add the type declaration in stdlib
- Add a special case of `ParameterGroupType` for parameter blocks
- Handle parameter blocks in type layout (currently handling them identically to constant buffers for now, which isn't going to be right in the long term)
- Add an IR pass that basically replaces `ParameterBlock<T>` with `T`
- Eventually this should replace it with either `T` or `ConstantBuffer<T>`, depending on whether the layout that was computed required a constant buffer to hold any "free" uniforms
- Add first stab at an IR pass to "scalarize" global variables using aggregate types with resources inside.
- This currently only applies to global variables, so it won't handle things passed through functions, or used as local variables
- It also only supports cases where the references to the original variable are always references to its fields, and not the whole value itself
- Add a single test case that technically passes with this level of support, but probably isn't very representative of what we need from the feature
* Fold parameter-block desugaring into a more complete "type legalization" pass
The basic problem that was arising is that once you desugar `ParameterBlock<T>` into `T`, you then need todeal with splitting `T` into its constituent fields if it contains any resource types.
Handling those transformations by following the usual use-def chains wasn't really helping, because you might need systematic rewriting that can really only be handled bottom-up.
This change adds a new pass that is intended to perform multiple kinds of type "legalization" at once:
- It will turn `ParameterBlock<T>` into `T`
- It may at some point also convert `ConstantBuffer<T>` into `T` as well
- It will turn an value of an aggregate type that contains resources into N different values (one per field)
- As a result of this, it will also deal with AOS-to-SOA conversion of these types
Legalization is applied to *every* function/instruction/value, so that it can make large-scale changes that would be tough to manage with a work list.
This pass needs to be run *after* generics have been fully specialized, so that we know we are always dealing with fully concrete types, so that their legalization for a given target is completely known.
This is still work in progress; there's more to be done to get this working with all our test cases, and finish the remaining `ParameterBlock<T>` work.
* Improve binding/layout information when using parameter blocks
- When doing type layout for a parameter block, don't include the resources consumed by the element type in the resource usage for the parameter block
- Note that this is pretty much identical to how a `ConstantBuffer<T>` does not report any `LayoutResourceKind::Uniform` usage, except that `ParameterBlock<T>` is *also* going to hide underlying texture/sampler reigster usage
- The one exception here is that any nested items that use up entire `space`s or `set`s those need to be exposed in the resource usage of the parent (I don't have a test for this)
- When type legalization needs to scalarize things, it must propagate layout information down to the new leaf variables. In general, the register/index for a new leaf parameter should be the sum of the offsets for all of the parent variables along the "chain" from the original variable down to the leaf (we aren't dealing with arrays here just yet).
- When type legalization decides to eliminate a pointer(-like) type (e.g., desugar `ParameterBlock<T>` over to `T`), actually deal with that in terms of the `LegalVal`s created, so that we can know to turn a `load` into a no-op when applied to a value that got indirection removed.
- Hack up the "complex" parameter-block test so that it actually passes (the big hack here is that the HLSL baseline is using names that are generated by the IR, and are unlikely to be stable as we add/remove transformations).
- Note: I can't make these be compute tests right now, because regsiter spaces/sets are a feature of D3D12/Vulkan, and our test runner isn't using those APIs.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- When peforming ordinary lookup, if the container declaration for a scope is an aggregate type or `extension` decl, then use a "breadcrumb" to make sure that we use a `this` expression as the base of any resulting declaration reference
- Add a test case for implicit `this` usage
- Update constrained generic test case to use implicit `this` for member reference, as was originally intended
|
|
This is the first step towards supporting traditional object-oriented method definitions; the second step will be to allow `this` expressions to be implicit.
- Add a test case using explicit `this`, and expected output
- Update parsing logic for expressions so that it handled identifiers similarly to the declaration and statement logic: first try to parse using a syntax declaration looked up in the curent scope, and otherwise fall back to the ordinary `VarExpr` case.
* As long as I'm making that change: switch `true` and `false` to be parsed via the callback mechanism rather than be special-cased.
* This change will also help out if we ever wanted to add `super`/`base` expressions, `new`, `sizeof`/`alignof` or any other expression keywords.
- Add a `ThisExpr` node and register a parser callback for it.
- Add semantic checks for `ThisExpr`: basically just look upwards through scopes until we find either an aggregate type declaration or an `extension` declaration, and then use that as the type of the expression.
- TODO: eventually we need to guard against a `this` expression inside of a `static` member.
- The IR generation logic already handled creation of `this` parameters in function signatures; the missing piece was to register the appropriate parameter in the context, so that we can use it as the lowering of a `this` expression.
|
|
This change includes a lot of infrastructure work, but the main point is to allow code like the following:
```
// define an interface
interface Helper { float help(); }
// define a generic function that uses the interface
float test<T : Helper>( T t ) { return t.help(); }
// define a type that implements the interface
struct A : Helper { float help() { return 1.0 } }
// define an ordinary function that calls the
// generic function with a concrete type:
float doIt()
{
A a;
return test<A>(a);
}
```
Getting this to generate valid code involves a lot of steps. This change includes the initial version of all of these steps, but leaves a lot of gaps where more complete implementation is required.
The changes include:
- Member lookup on types has been centralized, and now handles the case where the type we are looking for a member in is a generic parameter (e.g., given `t.help()` we can now look up `help` in `Helper` by knowing that `t` is a `T` and `T` conforms to `Helper`).
- There is an obvious cleanup still to be done here where the same exact logic should be used to look up available "constructor" declarations inside a type when the type is used like a function.
- Add a notion of subtype constraint "wittnesses" to the type system. When a generic is declared as taking `<T : Helper>` it really takes two generic parameters: the type `T` and a proof that `T` conforms to `Helper`. The actual arguments to a generic will then include both the type argument and a suitable witness argument (both type-level values).
- As it stands right now, a witness wraps a `DeclRef` to the declaration that represents the appropriate subtype relationship. So if we have `struct A : Helper`, that `: Helper` part turns into an `InheritanceDecl` member, and a reference to that member can serve as a witness to the fact that `A` conforms to `Helper`.
- Make explicit generic application `G<A,B>` synthesize the additional arguments that represent conformances required by the generic.
- This does *not* yet deal with the case where a generic is implicitly specialized as part of an ordinary call `G(a,b)`
- A bug fix to not auto-specialize generics during lookup. The problem here was related to an attempted fix of an earlier issue.
During checking of a method nested in a generic type, we were running into problems where `DeclRefType::create()` was getting called on an un-specialized reference to `vector`, and this was leading to a crash when the code looked for the arguments for the generic. This was worked around by having name lookup automatically specialize any generics it runs into while going through lookup contexts.
That choice creates the problem that in a generic method like this:
```
void test<T>(T val) { ... }
```
any reference to `val` inside the body of `test` will end up getting specialized so that it is effectively `test<T>::val`, when that isn't really needed.
- Add front-end logic to check that when a type claims to conform to an interface it actually must provide the methods required by the interface. The checking process goes ahead and builds a front-end "witness table" that maps declarations in the interface being conformed to over to their concrete implementations for the type.
- At the moment the checking is completely broken and bad: it assumes that *any* member with the right name is an appropriate declaration to satisfy a requirement. That obviously needs to be fixed.
- Add an explicit operation to the IR for lookup of methods: `lookup_interface_method(w, r)` where `w` is a reference to the "witness" value and `r` is an `IRDeclRef` for the member we want to look up.
- Add an explicit notion of witness tables to the IR. These end up being the IR representation of an `InheritanceDecl` in a type, and they are generated by enumerating the members that satisfy the interface requirements (which were handily already enumerated by the front-end checking). The witness table is an explicit IR value, and so it will be referenced/used at the site where conformance is being exploited (e.g., as part of a `specialize` call), so it should be safe to eliminate witness tables that are unused (since they represent conformances that aren't actually exploited). Similarly, the entries in a witness table are uses of the functions that implement interface methods, and so keep those live.
- In order to implement the above, I did a bit of a cleanup pass on the IR representation so that there is an `IRUser` base that `IRInst` inherits from, so that we can have users of values that aren't instructions.
- One annoying thing is that because of how types and generics are handled in the IR, we needed a way to have a type-level `Val` that wraps an IR-level value: e.g., to allow an IR-level witness table to be used as one of the arguments for specialization of a generic. The design I chose here is to have a "proxy" `Val` subclass (`IRProxyVal`) that wraps an `IRValue*`. These should only ever appear as part of types and `DeclRef`s that are used by the IR.
- One annoying bit here is that an IR value might then have a use that is not manifest in the set of IR instructions, and instead only appears as part of a type somewhere.
- I'm not 100% happy with this design, but it seems like we'd have to tackle similar issues if/when we eventually allow functions to have `constexpr` or `@Constant` parameters
- Make generic specialization also propagate witness table arguments through to their use sites (this is mostly just the existing substitution machinery, once we have `IRProxyVal`), and then include logic to specialize `lookup_interface_method` instructions when their first operand is a concrete witness table.
All of this work allows a single limited test using generics with constraints to pass, but more work is needed to make the solution robust.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
vertex/fragment shader pair, but instead of comparing the resulting framebuffer, it expects the test shader to write results into a UAV, and compares the pixel shader UAV output to the reference output.
|
|
|
|
When Slang sees a matrix multiplication `M * v` in GLSL code it should (obviously) output GLSL code that also does `M * v`, but there was a bug introduced where the type-checker manages to resolve the operation and recognize it as a matrix-vector multiply, and then the code-generation logic says "oh, I'm generating output for GLSL, and that is reversed from HLSL/Slang, so I'd better reverse these operands!" and outputs `v * M`... which isn't what we want.
I've fixed the problem in an expedient way, by having the front-end resolve the operation to what it believes is an intrinsic multiply operation, rather than a matrix-vector operation. If we ever support cross compilation *from* GLSL (unlikely), we've need to fix this up so that we have both real matrix-vector multiplies and "reversed" multiplies where the operands folow the GLSL convention).
I've added two tests here to confirm the fix. The one under `tests/bugs` catches the actual issue described above, and confirms the fix. The other one under `tests/cross-compile` is just to make sure that we *do* properly reverse the operands to a matrix-vector product when converting from Slang to GLSL.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* Fix up emission of shader parameter semantics when using IR
- Make sure to propagate entry point parameter layouts down to IR parameters when doing the initial cloning to form target-specific IR
- When layout information is present on an IR node, prefer to use that over the original high-level declaration for outputting semantics in final HLSL
- Fix up test runner to generate `.actual` files when running compute tests, in cases where the `render-test` application errors out (e.g., because of a Slang compilation error)
- Add a first test of generics functionality, to show that they generate valid code through the IR
- Right now this test is *not* using any "interesting" operations on the type parameter, so this is not a test that can confirm that interface constraints work
* fixup: skip compute tests when running on Linux
|
|
testing framework.
|
|
This is functionality required to support a Falcor bug fix.
Most of the code to compute the right semantic name/index for a parameter was already present.
This change adds:
- Storage for semantic name/index on every `VarLayout`
- Note: this is wasteful and should be optimized later
- A public API to query the semantic name/index
- The contract is that this API returns `NULL` if the parameter had no semantic
- A bit of work in `parameter-binding.cpp` to attach semantics to varying input/output when traversing varying parameters.
- Note: this is intentionally set up so that it associates semantics even with non-leaf parameters, so that an API user can query the semantic of a `struct` parameter and know that its members will be assigned sequential semantic indices from its starting value.
- Support for dumping this information in reflection tests
One notable thing that I did *not* change here is that the reflection test fixture doesn't report information on the output of an entry point, even though it really should. That should be fixed in a separate change, though, because it would affect many of the expected outputs.
|
|
There was already a pass in place that transformed parameters and results of an entry-point function into global variables for GLSL, but this pass would just turn a `struct`-type parameter into a `struct`-type global, which has two problems:
- The standard GLSL language doesn't seem to allow `struct` types as vertex shader inputs or fragment shader outputs.
- If there are any members in such a `struct` that represent "system value" inputs or outputs, then these would need to be transformed into the equivalent `gl_*` variables.
This change adds a more complete scalarization process that applies to inputs/outputs during the legalization pass. In order to support this there is a little bit of a data strcuture for abstracting over tuples of values (this same idiom is used in a few other places, so perhaps the implementation could be done once and shared?).
System values are current handled in a painfully ad hoc (and incomplete) fashion during code emit. We need to come up with a better solution for mapping HLSL `SV_*` semantics over to `gl_*` variables.
In some cases this mapping might introduce more code than we can easily deal with during emit time, so it probably needs to be handled back at the IR level.
This implementation has many gaps, but it appears to be enough to get teh `render/cross-compile-entry-point` test working with IR-based cross-compilation.
|
|
There are two big changes here:
- Add logic during the initial IR cloning pass for an entry point + target that tries to pick the best possible version of any target-overloaded function. This allows us to pick the intrinsic version of `saturate()` when compiling for HLSL output, but then pick the non-intrinsic version (that is implemented in terms of `clamp()`) when targetting GLSL.
- Add an initial specialization pass that tries to deal with generics. This required some fixing work to IR generation, so that we correctly generate explicit operations to specialize a generic for specific types (this is currently implemented as a `specialize` instruction that takes the generic to specialize plus a declaration-reference that represents the specialized form). With that work in place, we can scan for `specialize` instructions inside of non-generic functions, and use them to trigger generation of specialized code. We rely on the name-mangling scheme to help us find pre-existing specializations when possible.
There are also a bunch of cleanups encountered along the way:
- Don't use the explicit `layout(offset=...)` for uniforms, because it isn't supported by all current drivers. For now we will just assume that our layout rules compute the same values that the driver would for un-marked-up code. We can come back later and try to implement a workaround in the cases where this doesn't apply (e.g., by re-running the layout logic as part of emission, and dropping layout modifiers from variables that don't need explicit layout).
- Fix some issues in IR dump printing so that we print function declarations more nicely.
- Testing: print out failing pixel when image-diff fails
|
|
The big addition here is that the Slang "bytecode" is no longer treated as just a "code generation target" (`CodeGenTarget`) akin to DX bytecode (DXBC) or SPIR-V, but instead is a `ContainerFormat` that can be used to emit all the results of a compile request (well, currently just the IR-as-BC, but the intention is there).
Getting to this goal involved some prior checkins that eliminated bogus "targets" that weren't really akin to SPIR-V or DXBC: `-target slang-ir-asm` and `-target reflection-json`. Those targets were really in place to support testing, and so they've been made more explicit testing/debug options.
This change eliminates `-target slang-ir` and instead tries to allow the user to specify `-o foo.slang-module` as an output file name, that indicates the intention to output a "container" file that will wrap up all the generated code.
I've also gone ahead and generalized the existing `-target` option so that we are actually building up a *list* of code generation targets. This is largely just a cleanup, since it forces code to be more aware of when it is doing something target-specific vs. target independent. For example, reflection layout information lives on a requested target, and not on the compile request as a whole, and similarly output code is per-target, per-entry-point.
As a cleanup, I eliminated support for per-translation-unit output. This was vestigial code from back when I used to try and do HLSL generation for a whole translation unit instead of per-entry-point (which turned out to be a lot of complexity for little gain), and it was only being used in the `hello` example and the `render-test` test fixture - in both cases fixing it up was easy enough. I've stubbed out the old `spGetTranslationUnitSource` API, but haven't removed it yet.
|
|
* Get rid of the `-slang-ir-asm` target
This is really only useful for debugging, so I've replaced the functionality with a `-dump-ir` command line option (which dump's the IR for an entry point before doing codegen).
* fixup: use HLSL target, not DXBC, so test can run on Linux
|
|
Move reflection JSON generation into separate test fixture
|
|
* Bug fix: emit logic for `do` loops
This case was never tested, and I was outputting some garbage characters. This comit fixes the codegen and adds a test case.
* Bug fix: make sure to pass through `[allow_uav_condition]`
This also fixes the standard library definition of `IncrementCounter()` so that it returns a `uint` instead of `void`.
|
|
* Bug fix for vector initializer lists
When a vector was initialized with an initializer list:
float4 f = { 0, 1, 2, 3 };
we were following the logic for `struct` types (since `vector<T,N>` is technically a `struct` declaration in our stdlib...), but the type has no field, so we were (silently!) ignoring the actual operands.
I've applied a simple fix where we cast the operands to the element type of the vector, but a more complete fix will be needed sooner or later where we check the operand counts properly, etc.
* Create implicit cast AST nodes when calling initializers
The logic for dealing with implicit conversions was recently beefed up so that it would look at `__init` declarations in the target type, but in those cases the front-end would always create an `InvokeExpr` even when we would rather get an `ImplicitCastExpr` or (in the "rewrite" case) a `HiddenImplicitCastExpr`.
I've fixed this up for now by constructing a dummy expression to stand in for the "original" call expression when creating the final call (luckily our `TypeCastExpr` is already just a specialized `InvokeExpr`).
A better long-term solution might be to have implicit-ness or hidden-ness be modifiers or flags, rather than needing to use specialized forms of call nodes.
* Fix subscript operator for `RWTexture1D`
The index type was being declared as `uint1` instead of `uint`, and that created problems for downstream HLSL compilation when we introduced expressions like `uav[uint1(index)]` - the compiler would complain that a vector is not a valid index type.
* Fix up constant-folding of integer casts.
The old logic was checking for `InvokeExpr` before `TypeCastExpr`, but in the new setup a type cast *is* an `InvokeExpr`, so that case was never triggering.
All of the constant-folding code really needs to be revisited, though, so that it can use a more general-purpose evaluation scheme like the bytecode (so that we can handle a moral equivalent of `constexpr` in the long run).
* Fix implicit conversion costs for vector types
A recent change made it so that the logic for looking up implicit conversions now uses declarations of initializers in the standard library (rather than hand-coding all the cases in `check.cpp`).
One mistake made there was that we dropped the logic for computing implicit conversions between vectors of the same size, but different element types.
These conversions were still allowed by a catch-all (generic) declaration in the standard library, but that declaration didn't include any implicit conversion cost logic (since it was generic, there was no single cost to use).
This change explicitly enumerates the required conversions with their costs.
It is a bit unfortunate that this is an O(N^2) amount of code for N base types, but that seems unavoidable for now.
* Handle "lowering" of overloaded expressions
If we are in the `-no-checking` mode and the user calls an overloaded function from an `__import`ed file in a way such that Slang can't resolve the intended overload, we were failing to emit the definitions of the potential callees.
This change simply adds a case for `OverloadedExpr` in `lower.cpp` that explicitly lowers all the declarations that might have been referenced.
- There is a potentially for breakage here if we are outputting GLSL and one of the overloads is stage-specific.
- A more refined approach might try to recognize which over the overloaded options are even potentially applicable, and then output only those, but doing this would be way more complicated.
I've added a test case for this behavior, but it is a bit brittle because we need to confirm that we still produce the same error message as unmodified HLSL.
|
|
Given an input declaration like:
cbuffer C
{
int a = -1;
}
Slang was automatically generating a `packoffset` semantic to place the member manually, but was emitting it *after* the initializer of the original declaration:
cbuffer C : register(b)
{
int a = -1 : packoffset(c0);
}
That syntax is invalid, of course, and we actually want:
cbuffer C : register(b)
{
int a : packoffset(c0) = -1;
}
This wasn't spotted earlier because putting initializers on a `cbuffer` member is not commonly done, since it requires reading those values via the reflection API. Slang's reflection API currently provides no way to access default values like this, so they aren't of much use yet. Still, it is better to emit correct syntax even in cases like this one.
|
|
* Preprocessor: fix `undef` and redefinition
The logic for `undef` directives was failing to suppress macro expansion when reading the name to un-define, and so it wasn't actually working at all. We didn't notice this because we didn't have a test case, and users hadn't tried it.
The logic for `define` had a similar bug, which meant that any attempt to define an already-defined macro would fail with a cryptic error, rather than raising the intended warning.
Test cases have been added for both issues, along with the fixes.
* fixup: add expected output for tests added
|
|
We were accidentally parsing this:
(uint) a / b
as this:
(uint) ( a / b )
when it should be:
((uint) a) / b
This is a bug that seems to have been inherited from a long time ago. It has taken a while to bite anybody because the only class of expressions it would hit are multiplicative ones, and in many cases the difference in the cast order won't be noticed for values in a limited range.
|
|
When outputting GLSL from a Slang or HLSL entry point, we need to translate any parameters or results of an entry-point function into global declarations of `in` or `out` parameters, as needed by GLSL.
This change adds these transformations at the IR level, so that they don't need to complicate the emit logic.
More detailed changes:
- Make `render0` test use IR. It passes out of the box.
- Fix test runner to not always dump diffs on failures
I accidentally initialized an option to `true` instead of `false` when working on debugging the Travis CI failures.
- Special-case output for component-wise multiplication to handle GLSL `matrixCompMul()`
- Handle GLSL vs. HLSL output for calls to `mul()`
- Output proper `layout(std140)` on GLSL constant buffer declarations
- Require appropriate GLSL extension when emitting explicit `layout(offset = ...)` on constant buffer members
- TODO: Need to avoid requiring this extension in cases where the offsets are what would be computed anyway.
Realistically, should probably be emitting code with explicit padding, etc. to guarantee layouts.
- Add an IR-based pass to translate entry point functions by eliminating their input/output parameters and replacing them with global variables.
- Demangle names when calling target intrinsics
The lowering to the IR will turn a call like `sin(foo)` into a call to a function declaration with a mangled name like `_S3sin...`. This works fine when the user is calling their own functions, since the name mangling will apply to both the definition and use sites, but for builtin functions it obviously isn't what we want.
This change makes it so that we demangle the name of an instrinsic function just enough so that we can extract the original simple name, and make a call using that.
These changes do nor provide 100% of what we need when translating to GLSL, so the `cross-compile-entry-point` test *still* hasn't been flipped over to use the IR (even though that is the test case I've been using to develop these changes).
|
|
The main change I was working on here was to start having more of the builtin functions (in this case, `cos`, `sin`, and `saturate`) just lower to the IR as calls to builtin functions (with declarations but no definition), rather than expect/require them to map to individual IR opcodes in every case.
The main change there was the removal of some `intrinsic_op` modifiers in the stdlib. This then requires the `isTargetInstrinsic` logic in IR-based code emit to avoid emitting declarations for these intrinsics.
The corresponding logic for emitting *calls* to these intrinsics is currently being skipped.
Along the way, a variety of fixups were added:
- In order to support lowering to GLSL, we need to handle cases where a variable/function name uses a GLSL reserved word. The right long-term fix there is to always use generated or mangled names, but for now I'm hacking it by adding a `_s` prefix to all names during IR-based emit.
- This needs a flag to disable it, since some of our tests currently rely on checking binding information from generated HLSL/SPIR-V that will include these mangled/modified names.
- Emit matrix layout modifiers appropriately for GLSL
- Specialize IR parameter-block emission between GLSL and HLSL
- Fix up argument count/index logic for a couple of opcodes that weren't fixed when removing the types from the explicit operand list
- Fix up IR generation for calls to declarations with generic arguments. We were briefly adding the generic args to the ordinary argument list, which added complexity in several places. We now rely on the declaration-reference nodes in the IR to carry that extra info.
- TODO: We actually need to make sure that this is the case, since we don't currently correctly generated specialized decl-refs when building IR for function calls
The main test that would have been affected by this is `cross-compile-entry-point`, but I was not able to get that working fully with the IR. The main problem in this case was that when emitting GLSL we will need to perform certain required transformations on the IR to get legal code for GLSL. Notably:
- We need to hoist entry-point parameters away from being function parameters, and make them be global variables. This is currently being hand-waved during the emit logic, but it seems way better to have it all get cleaned up in the IR first.
- We need to scalarize entry-point parameters, because structure input/output is not supported as vertex input or fragment output (and it may be best to always scalarize anyway, to match HLSL semantics). (Note: "scalarize" here means to bust up structures, but not matrices/vectors)
|
|
* IR: overhaul IR design/implementation
Closes #192
Closes #188
This is a major overhaul of how the IR is implemented, with the primary goal of just using the AST-level type representation as the IR's type representation, rather than inventing an entire shadow set of types (as captured in issue #192).
One consequence of this choice is that types in the IR are no longer explicit "instructions" and are not represented as ordinary operands (so a bunch of `+ 1` cases end up going away when enumerating ordinary operands).
Along the way I also got rid of the embedded IDs in the IR (issue #188) because this wasn't too hard to deal with at the same time.
Another related change was to split the `IRValue` and `IRInst` cases, so that there are values that are not also instructions. Non-instruction values are now used to represent literals, references to declarations, and would eventually be used for an `undef` value if we need one. IR functions, global variables, and basic blocks are all values (because they can appear as operands), but not instructions.
The main benefit of this approach is that the top-level structure of a bytecode (BC) module is much simpler to understand and walk, and BC-level types are represented much more directly (such that we could conceivably use them for reflection soon).
* fixup: 64-bit build fix
* fixup: try to silence clang's pedantic dependent-type errors
* fixup: bug in VM loading of constants
|
|
* Get tests running/passing under Linux
- Fix up `dlopen` abstraction
- Fix up some test cases to request hlsl (rather than default to dxbc) so they can run on non-Windows targets
- Fix up test runner ignore tests that can't run on current platform (and not count those as failure)
- Fix file handle leeak in process spawner absttraction
- Get additional test-related applications building
- More tweaks to Travis script; in theory deployment is set up now (yeah, right)
* fixup
* fixup: Travis environment variable syntax
* fixup: Buffer->begin
* fixup: actually run full tests on one config
* fixup: add build status badge for Travis
|
