| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age |
|---|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
* Remove support for the -no-checking flag
Fixes #381
Fixes #383
Work on #382
- No longer expose flag through API (`SLANG_COMPILE_FLAG_NO_CHECKING`) and command-line (`-no-checking`) options
- Remove all logic in `check.cpp` that was withholding diagnostics (including errors) when the no-checking mode was enabled
- Remove `HiddenImplicitCastExpr`, which was only created to support no-checking mode (it represented an implicit cast that our checking through was needed, but couldn't emit because it might be wrong)
- Remove logic for storing function bodies as raw token lists when checking is turned off. I'm leaving in the `UnparsedStmt` AST node in case we ever need/want to lazily parse and check function bodies down the line.
- Remove a few of the code-generation paths we had to contend with, but keep the comment about them in place.
- Remove GLSL-based tests that can't meaningfully work with the new approach.
- Fix other tests that used a GLSL baseline so that their GLSL compiles with `-pass-through glslang` instead of invoking `slang` with the `-no-checking` flag.
- Remove tests that were explicitly added to test the "rewriter + IR" path, since that is no longer supported.
There is more cleanup that can be done here, now that we know that AST-based rewrite and IR will never co-exist, but it is probably easier to deal with that as part of removing the AST-based rewrite path.
We've lost some test coverage here, but actually not too much if we consider that we are dropping GLSL input anyway.
* Fixup: test runner was mis-counting ignored tests
* Fixup: turn on dumping on test failure under Travis
* Fixup: enable extensions in Linux build of glslang
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Fixes #301
The problem here is that if you have input GLSL code like:
```glsl
// example.vs
in vec3 pos;
```
and:
```glsl
// example.fs
in vec3 worldPos;
```
Then both `pos` and `worldPos` are reflected as global variables (parameters of the *program*), which both get bound to "varying input" resources, but there is no way to tell through the API that `pos` is a vertex parameter while `worldPos` is a fragment one.
The original request in issue #301 was to expose parameters like this not as a global variables, but rather as parameters of the entry point in their specific file. That is, treat it as if the user had written, e.g.:
```glsl
// example.vs
void vsMain(in vec3 pos) { ... }
```
Doing that would unify the GLSL and HLSL/Slang cases a bit, but would require the Slang reflection API to lie about the structure of code the user wrote. At a more basic level, that would have been hard to implement because the current reflection API just exposes the underlying AST, and the AST *needs* to leave `pos` at the global scope so that when we go and spit GLSL back out we retain the original structure.
This PR implements a more simplistic solution, where the user is allowed to query the stage that a varying parameter "belongs" to. For right now I'm only enabling this to work for varying parameters (but it doesn't care if they are entry-point or global-scope varyings). Despite what I said on #301, this should work for both the top-level parameter's variable layout, *and* any variable layouts for fields within its type reflection.
In terms of implementation, I took the simple but wasteful route: every `VarLayout` now has a `stage` field that is by default initialized to `SLANG_STAGE_NONE`. When collecting varying parameters, I take advantage of the fact that everything bottlenecks through `processEntryPointParameter()` which takes an `EntryPointParameterState` so that I can set the `VarLayout::stage` field for any varying parameter in one place.
While I was making this change, I also did a bit of cleanup so that the "official" names for the varying parameter categories are `VARYING_INPUT` and `VARYING_OUTPUT`, with `VERTEX_INPUT` and `FRAGMENT_OUTPUT` being "deprecated" in principle. I didn't do the bulk rename inside the codebase yet.
|
|
|
- This really just checks two basic things:
1. Was there any global variable declared with `in` and `sample`?
2. Did any code encountered during lowering referenece `gl_SampleIndex`?
- This doesn't cover what HLSL could need, nor what we would need for cross-compilation. Consider it GLSL-specific for now.
- In order to generate the information with even a reasonable chance of being accurate (not giving a ton of false positives) I tried to integrate the checks into the lowering process (so they only see code that is referenced, one hopes).
- For this to work with my testing setup, I needed to make sure that lowering is always performed, prior to emitting reflection info
- This change broke several reflection tests, because they had been using code that wouldn't actually pass the downstream compiler. I checked in fixes for those.
|
