| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
* Diagnose on use of struct inheritance.
* fix test.
* Fix tests.
* fix.
---------
Co-authored-by: ArielG-NV <159081215+ArielG-NV@users.noreply.github.com>
|
|
* SP004: implement initialize list translation to ctor
- We synthesize a member-wise constructor for each struct follow
the rules described in SP004.
- Add logic to translate the initialize list to constructor invoke
- Add cuda-host decoration for the synthesized constructor
- Remove the default constructor when we have a valid member init constructor
- Disable -zero-initialize option, will re-implement it in followup (#6109).
- Fix the overload lookup issue
When creating invoke expression for ctor, we need to call
ResolveInvoke() to find us the best candidates, however
the existing lookup logic could find us the base constructor
for child struct, we should eliminate this case by providing
the LookupOptions::IgnoreInheritance to lookup, this requires
us to create a subcontext on SemanticsVisitor to indicate that
we only want to use this option on looking the constructor.
- Do not implicit initialize a struct that doesn't have explicit default
constructor.
Co-authored-by: slangbot <186143334+slangbot@users.noreply.github.com>
|
|
|
|
|
|
* Warning on bool to float conversion.
* Fix test cases.
* Improve.
* LanguageServer: don't show constant value for non constant variables.
* Fix tests.
* Fix warnings in tests.
Co-authored-by: Yong He <yhe@nvidia.com>
|
|
If the user has a derived `struct` type:
```hlsl
struct Base { int b = 1; }
struct Derived : Base { int d = 2; }
```
Then it is still reasonable for them to want to use initializer lists when declaring variables using the `Derived` type:
```hlsl
Derived x = {};
Derived y = { 7, 8 };
```
This change implements two missing pieces of functionality in the Slang compiler to allow this case:
* First, when the front-end semantic checks are applied to an initializer list, if the type being initialized is a derived `struct` type it always expects to find initialization arguments for its base type before those for its fields.
* Second, when lowering an initializer-list expression from the AST to the IR, the compiler expects the first argument in the list to be the initial value for the base field (if any). This also applies to default-initialization of fields/variables.
This change slightly entangles front-end logic with the logic for how struct inheritance is lowered to the IR, but the behavior is unlikely to confuse users who expect C++-like layout.
It is worth noting that with this change it should be possible to initialize the base type using either a nested initializer list or flat arguments:
```hlsl
struct BigBase { int x; int y; int z; }
struct BigDerived : BigBase { int w; }
BigDerived a = { {1,2,3}, 4 };
BigDerived b = { 1, 2, 3, 4 };
```
This behavior should Just Work because of the existing C-like rules for initializer lists where an aggregate can be initialized by either a `{}`-enclosed block or distinct values for its leaf fields.
|
