summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/tests/language-feature/capability/capabilitySimplification1.slang
Commit message (Collapse)AuthorAge
* Error if super-type capabilities are a super-set of sub-type (#7452)ArielG-NV2025-08-08
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Fixes: #7410 Changes: 1. super-type capabilities must be a super-set of sub-type capabilities (and support the same shader stages/targets) * InheritanceDecl visits super-type to inherit it's capabilities; validate InheritanceDecl capabilities against sub-type * visit all container decl's with a default case * clean up functionDeclBase visitor * Simplify `diagnoseUndeclaredCapability` by moving logic into capability checking (more correct*) 3. added changed behavior to documentation 4. fixed some incorrect capabilities 5. **we do not** diagnose capability errors on interface requirement-to-implementation if both lack explicit capability requirements. This change is to work around a slangpy regression (test case for the failing situation is in `tests\language-feature\capability\capability-interface-extension-1.slang`), Note: maybe for slang-2026 we don't do this? 6. requirement & implementation must support the same shader stage/target. This was changed because otherwise we can have cases where `X` inherits from `Y`, but `Y` is only expected to be used in `glsl` whilst `X` is expected to be used in `hlsl | glsl` 7. removed `tests/language-feature/capability/capabilitySimplification3.slang` because it tests nothing special (redundant) Note: not using rebase due to separate branches depending on this PR --------- Co-authored-by: slangbot <186143334+slangbot@users.noreply.github.com>
* Make capability diagnostic message more friendly. (#6474)Yong He2025-02-27
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | * Make capability diagnostic message more friendly. * Fix. * Fix. * Fix. * Fix test. * Update expected fail setting for aarch64/linux * Fix.
* Implement WaveMultiPrefix* for SPIRV and GLSL (#6182)Darren Wihandi2025-01-29
|
* Simplify `CapabilitySet` Diagnostic Printing (#4678)ArielG-NV2024-07-23
Fixes: #4675 Fixes: #4683 Fixes: #4443 Fixes: #4585 Fixes: #4172 Made the following changes: 1. All capability diagnostic printing logic tries to simplify before printing. This means that we do not print atoms which imply another atom. 2. Do not print the `_` prefix part of atom names since it is misleading users on what they should use to solve a capability issue encountered. (`_Internal` `External` atom changes are not in this PR) 3. Bundle together printing of all sets which contain exactly the same atoms (excluding abstract atoms). This allows printing the following `vertex/fragment/hull/domain/... + glsl` instead of `vertex + glsl | fragment + glsl | hull + glsl | domain + glsl | ....` 4. Rework how entry-point errors are reported to users (example at bottom of PR comment) 5. Rework how atom-provenance data is collected to be leaner and more useful so we can rework the errors. There are 2 notable changes here: * We no longer store a list which describes where the first of an `CapabilityAtom` comes from. This heavily simplifies AST logic for the capability system. AST parsing of capabilities is much faster. The trade-off is faster AST parsing and correct AST node data for slower diagnostics if an error is found * atom-provenance data now stores a reference to an atom's use-site to provide information on **where** and **what** is wrong with user code versus only sharing **what** and not where.