summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/tests/cross-compile/image-load.slang.glsl
AgeCommit message (Collapse)Author
2019-05-22Translate .Load() to imageLoad() for Vulkan (#967)Tim Foley
* Translate .Load() to imageLoad() for Vulkan We were already emitting calls to `imageLoad()` and `imageStore` when a `RWTexture*` was used with `operator[]`: ```hlsl RWTexture2D<float> myTex; ... float value = myTex[xy]; // becomes an imageLoad myTex[xy] = value; // becomes an imageStore ``` However, we were *not* correctly handling the translation of an explicit `.Load()` operation: ```hlsl float value = myTex.Load(xy); ``` The `.Load()` operation was being translated to a GLSL `texelFetch` as it would be a for a `Texture2D`, and not to an `imageLoad()` as would make sense for a `RWTexture2D` (which becomes a GLSL `image2D`). This fix is confined to the stdlib, and is mostly a matter of emitting either `texelFetch` or `imageLoad` as the GLSL function name depending on the "access" of the resource type. It is messy code, but straightforward. One extra detail was that there had been logic to emit a `, 0` argument in the `texelFetch` calls in the non-read-only case, because `texelFetch` usualy requires an explicit mip-level argument and `.Load()` on a `RWTexture*` doesn't recieve an LOD parameter. This is a non-issue now that we are calling `imageLoad()` instead, because `imageLoad` doesn't need/want the extra argument. * fixup: change test baseline based on recent GLSL output changes * fixup: review feedback