summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/tests/compute/default-initializer.slang
Commit message (Collapse)AuthorAge
* Implement explciit binding for metal and wgsl. (#5778)Yong He2024-12-06
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | * Respect explicit bindings in wgsl emit. * Implement explciit binding generation for metal and wgsl. * Update toc. * Fix warnings in tests. * Fix tests. --------- Co-authored-by: Ellie Hermaszewska <ellieh@nvidia.com>
* Convert more tests to use shader objects (#1659)Tim Foley2021-01-15
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | This change converts a large number of our existing tests to use the `ShaderObject` support that was added to the `gfx` layer. In many cases, tests were just updated to pass `-shaderobj` and the result Just Worked. In other cases, a `name` attribute had to be added to one or more `TEST_INPUT` lines. For tests that did not work with shader objects "out of the box," I spent a little bit of time trying to get them work, but fell back to letting those tests run in the older mode. Future changes to the infrastructure will be needed to get those additional tests working in the new path. Along with the changes to test files, the following implementation changes were made to get additional tests working: * Because the shader object mode uses explicit register bindings (from reflection), the hacky logic that was offseting `u` registers for D3D12 based on the number of render targets gets disabled (by another hack). * The "flat" reflection information coming from Slang was not correctly reporting "binding ranges" for things that consumed only uniform data (which would be everything on CUDA/CPU), so it was refactored to properly include binding ranges for anything where the type of the field/variable implied a binding range should be created (even if the `LayoutResourceKind` was `::Uniform`). * A few fixes were made to the CUDA implementation of `Renderer`, in order to get additional tests up and running. Most of these changes had to do with texture bindings, which hadn't really been tested previously. In addition, a few changes were made that were attempts at getting more tests working, but didn't actually help. These could be dropped if requested: * As a quality-of-life feature (not being used) the `object` style of `TEST_INPUT` line is upgraded to support inferring the type to use from the type of the input being set. * Any `object` shader input lines get ignored in non-shader-object mode.
* Initial support for explicit default initializers (#1235)Tim Foley2020-02-21
This change makes it so that for a suitable type `MyType`, a variable declaration like: MyType v; is treated as if it were written: MyType v = MyType(); The definition of "suitable" here is that `MyType` needs to have an available `__init` declaration that can be invoked with zero arguments. I've added a test to confirm that the new behavior works in this specific case. There are a bunch of caveats to the feature as it stands today: * Just because `MyType` has a zero-parameter `__init`, that doesn't mean an array type like `MyType[10]` does, so arrays currently remain uninitialized by default. Fixing this gap requires careful consideration because some, but not all, array types should be default-initializable. * The change here should mean that a `struct` type with a field like `MyType f;` should count as having a default initial-value expression for that field, but I haven't confirmed that. * Even if a `struct` provides initial values for all its fields (e.g., `struct S { float f = 0; }`), that doesn't mean it has a default `__init` right now, so those `struct` types will still be left uninitialized by default. Converging all this behavior is still TBD. Just to be clear: there is no provision or plan in Slang to support destructors, RAII, copy constructors, move constructors, overloaded assignment operations, or any other features that buy heavily into the C++ model of how construction and destruction of values gets done. In fact, I'm not even 100% sure I like having this change in place at all, and I think we should reserve the right to revert it and say that only specific stdlib types get to opt in to default initialization along these lines.