| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age |
|---|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
* Rework command-line options handling for entry points and targets
Overview:
* The biggest functionality change is that the implicit ordering constraints when multiple `-entry` options are reversed: any `-stage` option affects the `-entry` to its *left* instead of to its *right* as it used to. This is technically a breaking change, but I expect most users aren't using this feature.
* The options parsing tries to handle profile versions and stages as distinct data (rather than using the combined `Profile` type all over), and treats a `-profile` option that specifies both a profile version and a stage (e.g., `-profile ps_5_0`) as if it were sugar for both a `-profile` and a `-stage` (e.g., `-profile sm_5_0 -stage fragment`).
* We now technically handle multiple `-target` options in one invocation of `-slangc`, but do not advertise that fact in the documentation because it might be confusing for users. Similar to the relationship between `-stage` and `-entry`, any `-profile` option affects the most recent `-target` option unless there is only one `-target`.
* The logic for associating `-o` options with corresponding entry points and targets has been beefed up. The rule is that a `-o` option for a compiled kernel binds to the entry point to its left, unless there is only one entry point (just like for `-stage`). The associated target for a `-o` option is found via a search, however, because otherwise it would be impossible to specify `-o` options for both SPIR-V and DXIL in one pass.
* The handling of output paths for entry points in the internal compiler structures was changed, because previously it could only handle one output path per entry point (even when there are multiple targets). The new logic builds up a per-target mapping from an entry point to its desired output path (if any).
Details:
* Support for formatting profile versions, stages, and compile targets (formats) was added to diagnostic printing, so that we can make better error messages. This is fairly ad hoc, and it would be nice to have all of the string<->enum stuff be more data-driven throughout the codebase.
* Test cases were added for (almost) all of the error conditions in the current options validation. The main one that is missing is around specifying an `-entry` option before any source file when compiling multiple files. This is because the test runner is putting the source file name first on the command line automatically, so we can't reproduce that case.
* Several reflection-related tests now reflect entry points where they didn't before, because the logic for detecting when to infer a default `main` entry point have been made more loose
* On the dxc path, beefed up the handling of mapping from Slang `Profile`s to the coresponding string to use when invoking dxc.
* A bunch of tests cases were in violation of the newly imposed rules, so those needed to be cleaned up.
* There were also a bunch of test cases that had accidentally gotten "disabled" at some point because there were comparing output from `slangc` both with and without a `-pass-through` option, but that meant that any errors in command-line parsing produced the *same* error output in both the Slang and pass-through cases. This change updates `slang-test` to always expect a successful run for these tests, and then manually updates or disables the various test cases that are affected.
* When merging the updated test for matrix layout mode, I found that the new command-line logic was failing to propagate a matrix layout mode passed to `render-test` into the compiler. This was because the `-matrix-layout*` options were implemented as per-target, but the target was being set by API while the option came in via command line (passed through the API). It seems like we want matrix layout mode to be a global option anyway (rather than per-target), so I made that change here.
* Add missing expected output files
* A 64-bit fix
* Remove commented-out code noted in review
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
* Rename existing ParameterBlock to ParameterGroup
We are planning to add a new `ParameterBlock<T>` type, which maps to the notion of a "parameter block" as used in the Spire research work.
Unfortunately, the compiler codebase already uses the term `ParameterBlock` as catch-all to encompass all of HLSL `cbuffer`/`tbuffer` and GLSL `uniform`/`buffer`/`in`/`out` blocks (all of which are lexical `{}`-enclosed blocks that define parameters...).
This change instead renames all of the existing concepts over to `ParameterGroup`, which isn't an ideal name, but at least doesn't directly overlap the new terminology or any existing terminology.
The new `ParameterBlockType` case will probably be a subclass of `ParameterGroupType`, since it is a logical extension of the underlying concept.
* Add Shader Model 5.1 profiles
The HLSL `register(..., space0)` syntax is only allowed on "SM5.1" and later profiles (which is supported by the newer version of `d3dcompiler_47.dll` that comes with the Win10 SDK, but not the older version of `d3dcompiler_47.dll` - good luck figuring out which you have!).
This change adds those profiles to our master list of profiles, and nothing else.
* First pass at support for `ParameterBlock<T>`
- Add the type declaration in stdlib
- Add a special case of `ParameterGroupType` for parameter blocks
- Handle parameter blocks in type layout (currently handling them identically to constant buffers for now, which isn't going to be right in the long term)
- Add an IR pass that basically replaces `ParameterBlock<T>` with `T`
- Eventually this should replace it with either `T` or `ConstantBuffer<T>`, depending on whether the layout that was computed required a constant buffer to hold any "free" uniforms
- Add first stab at an IR pass to "scalarize" global variables using aggregate types with resources inside.
- This currently only applies to global variables, so it won't handle things passed through functions, or used as local variables
- It also only supports cases where the references to the original variable are always references to its fields, and not the whole value itself
- Add a single test case that technically passes with this level of support, but probably isn't very representative of what we need from the feature
* Fold parameter-block desugaring into a more complete "type legalization" pass
The basic problem that was arising is that once you desugar `ParameterBlock<T>` into `T`, you then need todeal with splitting `T` into its constituent fields if it contains any resource types.
Handling those transformations by following the usual use-def chains wasn't really helping, because you might need systematic rewriting that can really only be handled bottom-up.
This change adds a new pass that is intended to perform multiple kinds of type "legalization" at once:
- It will turn `ParameterBlock<T>` into `T`
- It may at some point also convert `ConstantBuffer<T>` into `T` as well
- It will turn an value of an aggregate type that contains resources into N different values (one per field)
- As a result of this, it will also deal with AOS-to-SOA conversion of these types
Legalization is applied to *every* function/instruction/value, so that it can make large-scale changes that would be tough to manage with a work list.
This pass needs to be run *after* generics have been fully specialized, so that we know we are always dealing with fully concrete types, so that their legalization for a given target is completely known.
This is still work in progress; there's more to be done to get this working with all our test cases, and finish the remaining `ParameterBlock<T>` work.
* Improve binding/layout information when using parameter blocks
- When doing type layout for a parameter block, don't include the resources consumed by the element type in the resource usage for the parameter block
- Note that this is pretty much identical to how a `ConstantBuffer<T>` does not report any `LayoutResourceKind::Uniform` usage, except that `ParameterBlock<T>` is *also* going to hide underlying texture/sampler reigster usage
- The one exception here is that any nested items that use up entire `space`s or `set`s those need to be exposed in the resource usage of the parent (I don't have a test for this)
- When type legalization needs to scalarize things, it must propagate layout information down to the new leaf variables. In general, the register/index for a new leaf parameter should be the sum of the offsets for all of the parent variables along the "chain" from the original variable down to the leaf (we aren't dealing with arrays here just yet).
- When type legalization decides to eliminate a pointer(-like) type (e.g., desugar `ParameterBlock<T>` over to `T`), actually deal with that in terms of the `LegalVal`s created, so that we can know to turn a `load` into a no-op when applied to a value that got indirection removed.
- Hack up the "complex" parameter-block test so that it actually passes (the big hack here is that the HLSL baseline is using names that are generated by the IR, and are unlikely to be stable as we add/remove transformations).
- Note: I can't make these be compute tests right now, because regsiter spaces/sets are a feature of D3D12/Vulkan, and our test runner isn't using those APIs.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
AppVeyor has a different version of fxc installed by default, and it produces subtly different output for this test case.
It seems like later versions are clever enough to completely eliminate an empty `cbuffer` declaration, but earlier versions aren't.
I'm actually not entirely sure why Slang is successfully eliminating the cbuffer as well, but the output DXBC implies it was not generated.
|
|
|
Fixes #171
Fixes #172
These two bugs related to bad logic in handling of splitting resource-containing `cbuffer` declarations.
- Issue #171 was the case where a `cbuffer` *only* had resource fields, in which case we crashed whenever referencing any field (some code was assuming there had to be non-resource fields)
- Issue #172 was a case where two fields were declared with a single declaration (`Texture2D a, b;`), and the logic we had for tracking resource-type fields was accidentally tagging *both* fields with a single modifier so that field `b` would get confused for `a` in some contexts, and attempts to access `b` would crash.
Both issues are now fixed, and regression tests have been added.
|
