summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/tests/bindings
AgeCommit message (Collapse)Author
2018-02-07Generate SSA form for IR functions (#400)Tim Foley
* Generate SSA form for IR functions The basic idea here is simple: in the front-end after we have lowered the AST to initial IR we will apply a set of "mandatory" optimization passes. The first of these is to attempt to translate the all functions into SSA form so that they are amenable to subsequent dataflow optimizations. Eventually, the mandatory optimization passes would include diagnostic passes that make sure variables aren't used when undefined, etc. Just doing basic SSA generation already cleans up a lot of the messiness in our IR today, because constructs that used to involve many local variables can now be handled via SSA temporaries. The implementation of SSA generation is in `ir-ssa.cpp`, and it follows the approach of Braun et al.'s "Simple and Efficient Construction of Static Single Assignment Form." I used this instead of the more well-known Cytron et al. algorithm because Braun's algorith mis very simple to code, and does not require auxiliary analyses to generate the dominance frontier. The main wrinkle in our SSA representation right now is that instead of using ordinary phi nodes, we instead allow basic blocks to have parameters, where predecessor blocks pass in different parameter values. This encodes information equivalent to traditional phi nodes, but has two (small) benefits: 1. There is no fixed relationship between the order of phi operands and predecessor blocks, so we don't have to worry about breaking the phis when we alter the order in which predecessors are stored. This is important for us because predecessors are being stored implicitly. 2. It is easy to operationalize a "branch with arguments" either when lowering to other languages, or when interpreting the IR. A branch with arguments is implemented as a sequence of stores from the arguments to the parameters of the target block (very similar to a call), followed by a jump to the block. Relevant to the above, this change also adds an interface for enumerating the predecessors or successors of a block in our CFG. Rather than use an auxliary structure, we directly use the information already encoded in the IR: * The sucessors of a block are the target label operands of its terminator instruction. In our IR this is a contiguous range of `IRUse`s, possible with a stride (to account for the way `switch` interleaves values and blocks). * The predecessors of a block are a subset of the uses of the block's value. Specifically, they are any uses that are on a terminator instruction, and within the range of values that represent the successor list of that instruction. One important limitation of the "blocks with arguments" model for handling phis is that it is really only convenient to stash extra arguments on an unconditional terminator instruction. This change works around this prob lem by breaking any "critical edges" - edges between a block with multiple successors and one with multiple predecessors. We assume that "phi" nodes will only ever be needed on a block with multiple predecessors, and because critical edges are broken, each of these predecessors will then have only a single successor, so its branch instruction can handle the extra arguments. This change introduces a notion of an "undefined" instruction in the IR. This is handled as an instruction rather than a value because I anticipate that we will want to distinguish different undefined values when it comes time to start issuing error messages (those messages will need to point to the variable that was used when undefined). * Fix expected test output. Another change was merged that enabled the `glsl-parameter-blocks` test, and its output is affected by our IR optimization work.
2018-02-07Support __target_intrinsic modifiers in IR codegen (#401)Tim Foley
The standard library already has a bunch of these decorations, since they were added to support Slang->Vulkan codegen on the AST-to-AST path. This change makes the IR code generator able to exploit the modifiers so that we pick up a bunch of Vulkan support "for free" in the short term. The basic change is in `lower-to-ir.cpp` where we copy over any `TargetIntrinsicModifier`s to become `IRTargetIntrinsicDecoration`s with the same information. We then need a bit of logic in `ir.cpp` to make sure we clone them as needed. The core work of using the modifiers is in `emit.cpp`, where I basically just copy-pasted the existing logic that applied in the AST path (all the AST-related code there is dead, and we should clean it up soon). The big change that comes with this logic is that when dealing with a member function, the numbering of the argument used in the intrinsic definition string changes, so that `$0` refers to the base object (whereas before the base object was looked up via the base expression of a `MemberExpr` used for the function). This requires a bunch of the definitions in the library to be updated; hopefully I caught them all. For kicks, I've re-enabled a cross-compilation test just to confirm that we are generating valid SPIR-V for code that performs texture-fetch operations. I don't expect us to keep that test enabled as-is in the long term, though, because it would be much better to instead use render-test to do the same thing. Alas, beefing up the Vulkan support in render-test is an outstanding work item, and I didn't want to pollute this change with more work along those lines.
2018-02-03Remove non-IR codegen paths (#398)Tim Foley
The basic change is simple: remove support for all code generation paths other than the IR. There is a lot of vestigial code left, but the main logic in `ast-legalize.*` is gone. Doing this breaks a *lot* of tests, for various reasons: - We can no longer guarantee exactly matching DXBC or SPIR-V output after things pass through out IR - Many builtins don't have matching versions defined for GLSL output via IR (even when they had versions defined via the earlier approach that worked with the AST) - A lot of code creates intermediate values of opaque types in the IR, which turn into opaque-type temporaries that aren't allowed (this breaks many GLSL tests, but also some HLSL) I implemented some small fixes for issues that I could get working in the time I had, but most of the above are larger than made sense to fix in this commit. For now I'm disabling the tests that cause problems, but we will need to make a concerted effort to get things working on this new substrate if we are going to make good on our goals.
2018-02-02Remove support for the -no-checking flag (#392)Tim Foley
* Remove support for the -no-checking flag Fixes #381 Fixes #383 Work on #382 - No longer expose flag through API (`SLANG_COMPILE_FLAG_NO_CHECKING`) and command-line (`-no-checking`) options - Remove all logic in `check.cpp` that was withholding diagnostics (including errors) when the no-checking mode was enabled - Remove `HiddenImplicitCastExpr`, which was only created to support no-checking mode (it represented an implicit cast that our checking through was needed, but couldn't emit because it might be wrong) - Remove logic for storing function bodies as raw token lists when checking is turned off. I'm leaving in the `UnparsedStmt` AST node in case we ever need/want to lazily parse and check function bodies down the line. - Remove a few of the code-generation paths we had to contend with, but keep the comment about them in place. - Remove GLSL-based tests that can't meaningfully work with the new approach. - Fix other tests that used a GLSL baseline so that their GLSL compiles with `-pass-through glslang` instead of invoking `slang` with the `-no-checking` flag. - Remove tests that were explicitly added to test the "rewriter + IR" path, since that is no longer supported. There is more cleanup that can be done here, now that we know that AST-based rewrite and IR will never co-exist, but it is probably easier to deal with that as part of removing the AST-based rewrite path. We've lost some test coverage here, but actually not too much if we consider that we are dropping GLSL input anyway. * Fixup: test runner was mis-counting ignored tests * Fixup: turn on dumping on test failure under Travis * Fixup: enable extensions in Linux build of glslang
2018-01-03Fix bug around arrays of structs of resources (#352)Tim Foley
Should fix #351 The basic problem is that the type layout logic in Slang isn't taking into account the way that resource-type fields in aggregate types get split. When you just have a bare aggregate, this oversight doesn't cause a problem, but once you put those aggregates into an array, the problems become clear. Given: ```hlsl struct Test { Texture2D a; Texture2D b; }; Test test[8]; ``` The default type-layout algorithm gives `Test::a` an offset of zero, and `Test::b` an offset of one. However, after splitting, we have something like: ```hlsl Texture2D test_a[8]; Texture2D test_b[8]; ``` It is clear in this case that `test_b` can't start at an offset of one relative to `test_a` - it needs to start at `register(t8)`. This change handles things by adjusting the layout of an array type to account for this detail as soon as it is created. The alternative would have been to not change layout rules at all, but to instead try to adjust things at the point where types get split (and the layout for the un-split case gets applied to the split variable). The reason for doing it the way it is in this change is that the reflection API will hopefully provide accurate information. Related to reflection information, one thing that is missing here is proper computation of the "stride" for an array like this. We'll see if that needs to be addressed in a follow-up.
2017-12-18Work on getting rewriter + IR playing nice together. (#314)Tim Foley
* Work on getting rewriter + IR playing nice together. There are a few different changes here, with the goal of improving the interaction between the "rewriter" code generation approach and the new IR and type legalization code. The main changes are: - Add a new pass that occurs before the AST legalization pass, which walks the (used) AST declarations and tries to discover (1) which declarations need to be specialized/lowered via the IR, and (2) which declarations need to be included in the resulting AST module. - AST-based legalization now uses the generated list when in "rewriter" mode, so that we should be working around issues that users were seeing with types not getting emitted. - TODO: we still need an equivalent fixup in the case of non-"rewriter" emit, so this may still be a problem for `.slang` files. - IR type legalization now precedes AST legalization, so that we can record information on how any IR global values got legalized (e.g., if they got split). Then AST legalization includes logic to reconstruct suitable tuple expressions to reference a split global. - When emitting using IR + AST, we walk all of the declarations that we decided belonged to the IR, but which were subsequently referenced in the AST, to make sure they get output (this would include `struct` types that are declared in a file compiled via IR, but never used in IR-based code). The rewriter+IR use case still doesn't *quite* work, but the logic for walking the AST in a pre-pass ends up being needed/useful to fix some pure rewriter bugs, so I'm getting this checked in sooner rather than later. * Fixup: walk arguments to generic declaration reference The gotcha here is that the code for walking the AST would walk a line of code like: SomeType a; and know to traverse the declaration of `SomeType`, but if it saw a line of code like: ParameterBlock<SomeType> b; it would traverse the declaration of `ParameterBlock`, but fail to visit that of `SomeType`.
2017-12-15More fixups for parameter block binding generation (#311)Tim Foley
* More fixups for parameter block binding generation The bug in this case arises when there is both a parameter block and global-scope resources, all of which are relying on automatic binding assignment. If the parameter block is the first global-scope parameter that gets encountered, then it is possible for it to allocate regsiter space/set zero for itself, which confuses the logic for handling other global-scope parameters (which assumes that *they* get space/set zero). I've also made some fixup to the reflection test harness and reflection API code: - Have the hardness handle register-space allocations when printing, and be sure to only show their `index` and not their `space` (since that would be redundant) - Have the reflection API only auto-redirect queries on a parameter group type layout to its container type layout *if* the container type layout has a non-zero number of resource allocations. The problem that arises here is a `ParameterBlock<X>` where `X` doesn't contain any uniforms, so that no container is needed. In that case the container ends up with no resource allocation(s). * Fixups for test failures. - The thread-group size tests failed because they had shader parameters with no resources to back them (built-in `SV_` inputs), and the printing of those changed. I fixed up the baseline, but also had to fix a few bugs in the reflection test fixture's printing logic. - The GLSL parameter block test revealed a corner case of the existing logic: because we always need to generate a binding for the "hack" sampler (even if code doesn't end up needing it), and that sampler should always go in the "default" set (should be set zero), the user's `ParameterBlock` will always end up as `set=1` or later, even if there are no other global-scope parameters. - This will be fixed once we don't have to rely on glslang's annoying behavior in this one case, either because glslang gets fixed, or because we implement our own SPIR-V codegen.
2017-12-14More fixups for Vulkan parameter block bindings (#309)Tim Foley
I'm adding a small cross-compilation test to try to make sure that we are testing the binding generation for GLSL output. We probably still need a more complex test that uses multiple blocks, plus variables not in a block. The big changes here are: - Change the `containerTypeLayout` field to a `containerVarLayout` in the `ParameterGroupTypeLayout`, so that we can store the base offsets for the fields in a uniform fashion (even though these will all be zero). - Switch the emit logic to carefully use either the container or element var layout depending on what they are emitting bindings for. This involved adding something akin to the "reflection path" notion that Falcor has to use, but only for the emit step.
2017-11-16Revise type legalization so it can handle constant buffers (#282)Tim Foley
* Revise type legalization so it can handle constant buffers The existing legalization approach with "tuples" can handle scalarizing a `struct` type with resource-type fields in it, but it had several big gaps. The most notable is that given a type that mixes uniform and resource fields, we can't just blindly scalarize things: ``` struct P { float4 a; float4 b; Texture2D t; }; cbuffer C { P gParam[8]; }; ``` The existing code was completely ignoring the declaration of `gParam` inside `C`, but even if we fixed that issue, we'd get something like: ``` cbuffer C { float4 gParam_a[8]; float4 gParam_b[8]; }; Texture2D gParam_t[8]; ``` In this case we've completely changed the layout of the uniform buffer, by switching from AOS to SOA. Even if we could get the type layout logic and the IR to agree on this, it would be a surprise to users, and "principle of least surprise" should be a big deal on a project with as many moving parts as ours. The right thing to do is to have legalization create a "stripped" version of the original type `P` and use that: ``` struct P_stripped { float4 a; float4 b; }; cbuffer C { P_stripped gParam[8]; }; Texture2D gParam_t[8]; ``` Then at a call site, this: ``` foo(gParam); ``` becomes: ``` foo(gParam, gParam_t); ``` This is exactly how the current AST-to-AST legalization handles mixed uniform and resource types, but the way it does it involves some annoying kludges: - That pass has a notion of a "tuple" similar to our legalization, but every tuple has an optional "primary" entry for all the uniform data, plus tuple elements for the resources, and a given field may be represented on one side, the other, or both. It makes the code for handling tuples very messy. - That pass does the "stripping" of types by actually marking up the AST declarations (this is okay because it is constructing a new AST as it goes), so that when they get emitted certain fields don't actually show up. That is, we fix the problem with type `P` by actually *modifying* the user's declaration of `P`. That seems out of bounds for the IR. This change fixes the problem in our IR type legalization while trying to avoid the problems of the AST-to-AST pass by using two new ideas: 1. We add a new case for `LegalType` (and `LegalVal`) that is a "pair" type, where a pair consists of both an "ordinary" type (for uniform data) and a "special" type (for resource data). E.g., after legalization, the type for `C` (which can be over-simplified to `ConstantBuffer<P>` for our purposes), will be a `LegalType::pair` where the ordinary side is `ConstantBuffer<P_stripped>` and the special side is a tuple containing the `Texture2D` field. 2. We add a new (and annoyingly hacky) AST-level type called `FilteredTupleType` which is semantically a sort of tuple type (it holds a list of elements, and the elements have their own types), but which remembers an "original type" that it was created from, and for each element remembers the field of the original type that it corresponds to. This is used to construct a type like `P_stripped` as an actual AST-level structural type. The core logic for legalizing an aggregate type had to get more complicated just because of the new pair case, so there is now a `TupleTypeBuilder` that asists with taking an aggregate type, processing its fields, and then picking the right `LegalType` representation for the result. Other smaller changes: - Made the legalization logic actually legalize `PtrType<T>`. E.g., if `T` legalizes to a tuple, we need to construct a tuple of pointer types. The same exact thing needs to be applied to arrays, and any other generic type that should "distribute over" pairs/tuples. - Made the legalization logic actually legalize `ConstantBuffer<T>` and similar. The basic idea there is if `T` maps to a pair, we wrap `ConstantBuffer<...>` around the ordinary side, and `implicitDeref` around the special side. - Removed a bunch of `#ifdef`ed-out code from the end of `ir-legalize-types.cpp`. That was code from my first attempt at legalization that failed miserably (trying to do it via local changes and a work list instead of a global rewrite pass), but it had some code I wanted to reference when writing the version that actually got checked in (should have deleted the code earlier, though). - Added a bunch of cases for `LegalType::none` (and the `LegalVal` equivalent) that helped simplify the logic fo the `pair` case by allowing me to *always* dispatch to both the "ordinary" and "special" sides, even if they might not actually be present. - Renamed `TupleType` and `TupleVal` over to `TuplePseudoType` and `TuplePseudoval` to recognize the fact that we might actually need/want *real* tuples in the type system, to go along with these fake ones (that need to be optimized away). The biggest doubt I have about this change is the whole `FilteredTupleType` thing; it seems like an obviously contrived type to add to the front-end type system that really only solves IR-level problems. A cleaner approach might have been to just add a plain old `TupleType` to the front-end type system (and initially I started with that), and then have yet another `LegalType`/`LegalVal` case that handles mapping from the fields of the original type to the numbered tuple elements. I expect we'll actually want to make that change in the future (especially if we ever add true tuples to the front-end), but for right now I let myself be swayed by the desire to have these stripped/filtered types get names that explain their provenance ("where they came from") to make our output code more debuggable. The way I've done it is probably overkill, though, and we need a much more complete effort on the readability and debuggability of our output before anything like that is worth worrying about. * Fixup: typo * Fixup: fix output of "non-mangled" names for test cases - Make sure to attach high-level decls to variables created as part of type legalization - Also, try to share more of the code between the different cases of variables - Fix up `parameter-blocks` test case that was passing `-no-mangle` but expecting mangled names in the output - Fix up `multiple-parameter-blocks` to not rely on `-no-mangle` for now, because it would lead to two global variables with the same name (need to fix that underlying issue eventually). - Also fix name generation logic so that we only use "original" names (from high-level decls) specifically when the `-no-mangle` flag is on, and otherwise use IR-level names. * Fix: handle constant buffers better in render-test - Don't request both CB and SRV usage for buffers, since that is illegal - Also, don't try to create an SRV when user requested a CB (since the required usage flag won't be there) - Record the input buffer type on the `D3DBinding` for a buffer, and use that to tell us when to bind a CB instead of SRV/UAV - Fix expected output for `cbuffer-legalize` test now that we are actually feeding it correct cbuffer dta.
2017-11-13Parameter block work (#276)Tim Foley
* Don't auto-enable IR use for compute tests The `COMPARE_COMPUTE` and `COMPARE_RENDER_COMPUTE` test fixtures were set up to always enable the `-use-ir` flag on Slang, which precludes having any tests that confirm functionality on the old non-IR path (which is still required by our main customer). This change adds the `-xslang -use-ir` flags explicitly to any compute test cases that left them out, and makes the fixture no longer add it by default. * Continue building out parameter block support The initial front-end logic for parameter blocks was already added, but they are still missing a bunch of functionality. This change addresses some of the known issues: - Bug fix: don't try to emit HLSL `register` bindings for variables that consume whole register spaces/sets - Overhaul type layout logic so that it can make decisions based on a given code generation target (currently passed in as a `TargetRequest`), which allows us to decide whether or not a parameter block should get its own register set on a per-target basis. - Always use a register space/set for Vulkan - Never use a register space/set for HLSL SM 5.0 and lower - By default, don't use register spaces/sets for HLSL output - Add a command-line flag and some "target flags" to enable register-space usage for D3D targets - Hackily add initial support for parameter blocks in the AST-to-AST path - This just blindly lowers `ParameterBlock<T>` to `T`, which shouldn't quite work - A more complete overhaul will probably need to wait until the AST-to-AST legalization is changed to use the `LegalType`s from the IR legalization pass. - Add a compute-based test case to actually run code using parameter blocks - This file runs test cases both with and without the IR
2017-11-06Parameter blocks (#245)Tim Foley
* Rename existing ParameterBlock to ParameterGroup We are planning to add a new `ParameterBlock<T>` type, which maps to the notion of a "parameter block" as used in the Spire research work. Unfortunately, the compiler codebase already uses the term `ParameterBlock` as catch-all to encompass all of HLSL `cbuffer`/`tbuffer` and GLSL `uniform`/`buffer`/`in`/`out` blocks (all of which are lexical `{}`-enclosed blocks that define parameters...). This change instead renames all of the existing concepts over to `ParameterGroup`, which isn't an ideal name, but at least doesn't directly overlap the new terminology or any existing terminology. The new `ParameterBlockType` case will probably be a subclass of `ParameterGroupType`, since it is a logical extension of the underlying concept. * Add Shader Model 5.1 profiles The HLSL `register(..., space0)` syntax is only allowed on "SM5.1" and later profiles (which is supported by the newer version of `d3dcompiler_47.dll` that comes with the Win10 SDK, but not the older version of `d3dcompiler_47.dll` - good luck figuring out which you have!). This change adds those profiles to our master list of profiles, and nothing else. * First pass at support for `ParameterBlock<T>` - Add the type declaration in stdlib - Add a special case of `ParameterGroupType` for parameter blocks - Handle parameter blocks in type layout (currently handling them identically to constant buffers for now, which isn't going to be right in the long term) - Add an IR pass that basically replaces `ParameterBlock<T>` with `T` - Eventually this should replace it with either `T` or `ConstantBuffer<T>`, depending on whether the layout that was computed required a constant buffer to hold any "free" uniforms - Add first stab at an IR pass to "scalarize" global variables using aggregate types with resources inside. - This currently only applies to global variables, so it won't handle things passed through functions, or used as local variables - It also only supports cases where the references to the original variable are always references to its fields, and not the whole value itself - Add a single test case that technically passes with this level of support, but probably isn't very representative of what we need from the feature * Fold parameter-block desugaring into a more complete "type legalization" pass The basic problem that was arising is that once you desugar `ParameterBlock<T>` into `T`, you then need todeal with splitting `T` into its constituent fields if it contains any resource types. Handling those transformations by following the usual use-def chains wasn't really helping, because you might need systematic rewriting that can really only be handled bottom-up. This change adds a new pass that is intended to perform multiple kinds of type "legalization" at once: - It will turn `ParameterBlock<T>` into `T` - It may at some point also convert `ConstantBuffer<T>` into `T` as well - It will turn an value of an aggregate type that contains resources into N different values (one per field) - As a result of this, it will also deal with AOS-to-SOA conversion of these types Legalization is applied to *every* function/instruction/value, so that it can make large-scale changes that would be tough to manage with a work list. This pass needs to be run *after* generics have been fully specialized, so that we know we are always dealing with fully concrete types, so that their legalization for a given target is completely known. This is still work in progress; there's more to be done to get this working with all our test cases, and finish the remaining `ParameterBlock<T>` work. * Improve binding/layout information when using parameter blocks - When doing type layout for a parameter block, don't include the resources consumed by the element type in the resource usage for the parameter block - Note that this is pretty much identical to how a `ConstantBuffer<T>` does not report any `LayoutResourceKind::Uniform` usage, except that `ParameterBlock<T>` is *also* going to hide underlying texture/sampler reigster usage - The one exception here is that any nested items that use up entire `space`s or `set`s those need to be exposed in the resource usage of the parent (I don't have a test for this) - When type legalization needs to scalarize things, it must propagate layout information down to the new leaf variables. In general, the register/index for a new leaf parameter should be the sum of the offsets for all of the parent variables along the "chain" from the original variable down to the leaf (we aren't dealing with arrays here just yet). - When type legalization decides to eliminate a pointer(-like) type (e.g., desugar `ParameterBlock<T>` over to `T`), actually deal with that in terms of the `LegalVal`s created, so that we can know to turn a `load` into a no-op when applied to a value that got indirection removed. - Hack up the "complex" parameter-block test so that it actually passes (the big hack here is that the HLSL baseline is using names that are generated by the IR, and are unlikely to be stable as we add/remove transformations). - Note: I can't make these be compute tests right now, because regsiter spaces/sets are a feature of D3D12/Vulkan, and our test runner isn't using those APIs.
2017-10-05Working on better handling of builtin functions in IR (#196)Tim Foley
The main change I was working on here was to start having more of the builtin functions (in this case, `cos`, `sin`, and `saturate`) just lower to the IR as calls to builtin functions (with declarations but no definition), rather than expect/require them to map to individual IR opcodes in every case. The main change there was the removal of some `intrinsic_op` modifiers in the stdlib. This then requires the `isTargetInstrinsic` logic in IR-based code emit to avoid emitting declarations for these intrinsics. The corresponding logic for emitting *calls* to these intrinsics is currently being skipped. Along the way, a variety of fixups were added: - In order to support lowering to GLSL, we need to handle cases where a variable/function name uses a GLSL reserved word. The right long-term fix there is to always use generated or mangled names, but for now I'm hacking it by adding a `_s` prefix to all names during IR-based emit. - This needs a flag to disable it, since some of our tests currently rely on checking binding information from generated HLSL/SPIR-V that will include these mangled/modified names. - Emit matrix layout modifiers appropriately for GLSL - Specialize IR parameter-block emission between GLSL and HLSL - Fix up argument count/index logic for a couple of opcodes that weren't fixed when removing the types from the explicit operand list - Fix up IR generation for calls to declarations with generic arguments. We were briefly adding the generic args to the ordinary argument list, which added complexity in several places. We now rely on the declaration-reference nodes in the IR to carry that extra info. - TODO: We actually need to make sure that this is the case, since we don't currently correctly generated specialized decl-refs when building IR for function calls The main test that would have been affected by this is `cross-compile-entry-point`, but I was not able to get that working fully with the IR. The main problem in this case was that when emitting GLSL we will need to perform certain required transformations on the IR to get legal code for GLSL. Notably: - We need to hoist entry-point parameters away from being function parameters, and make them be global variables. This is currently being hand-waved during the emit logic, but it seems way better to have it all get cleaned up in the IR first. - We need to scalarize entry-point parameters, because structure input/output is not supported as vertex input or fragment output (and it may be best to always scalarize anyway, to match HLSL semantics). (Note: "scalarize" here means to bust up structures, but not matrices/vectors)
2017-09-11Support IR-based codegen for a few more examples.Tim Foley
The main interesting change here is around support for lowering of calls to "subscript" operations (what a C++ programmer would think of as `operator[]`). An important infrastructure change here was to add an explicit AST-node representation for a "static member expression" which we use whenever a member is looked up in a type as opposed to a value. The implementation of this probably isn't robust yet, but it turns out to be important to be able to tell such cases apart.
2017-09-07Replace old notion of "intrinsic" operationsTim Foley
The code previously had an enumerated type for "intrinsic" operations, and allowed functions to be marked `__intrinsic_op(...)` to indicate the operation they map to. The nature of the IR meant that each of these intrinsic ops had to have a corresponding IR opcode, but the `enum` types weren't the same. This change cleans things up a bit by deciding that the `__intrinsic_op(...)` modifier names an actual IR opcode, and so the `IntrinsicOp` enum is gone. The biggest source of complexity here is that there are certain operations that need to be "intrinsic"-ish for the purposes of the current AST-based translation path, because we need them to round-trip from source to AST and back. Right now this is being handled by defining a bunch of "pseudo-ops" which can be used in the `__intrinsic_op` modifier, but which are *not* meant to be represented in the IR. Currently I don't actually handle this during IR generation. In the long run, once we are using IR for everything that needs cross-compilation, we should be able to eliminate the pseudo-ops in favor of just having these be ordinary (inline) functions defined in the stdlib (e.g., the `+=` operator can just have a direct definition). There was a second category of modifier that gets a little caught up in this, which is the `__intrinsic` modifier, which got used in two ways: 1. A function marked `__intrinsic(glsl, ...)` had what I call a "target intrinsic" modifier, which specified how to lower it for a specific target (e.g., GLSL). 2. A function just marked `__intrinsic` was supposed to be a marker for "this function shouldn't be emitted in the output, because the implementation is expected to be provided" The latter category of function should really be an `__intrinsic_op`, so I translated all those uses. I added a tiny bit of sugar so that `__intrinsic_op` without an explicit opcode will look up an opcode based on the name of the function being called, so that an operation like `sin` can automatically be plumbed through to an equivalent IR op. (The first category is a stopgap for the AST-based cross-compilation, and will hopefully be replaced by something better as we get the IR-based path working). Getting the switch from `__intrinsic` to `__intrinsic_op` working required shuffling around some code in `emit.cpp` that handles looking up those modifiers and emitting builtin operations appropriately during cross-compilation. Depending on where we go with things, a possible extension of this approach is to allow multiple operands to `__intrinsic_op` so that the first specifies the opcode, and then the rest are literal arguments to specify "sub-ops." This could help us handle stuff like texture-fetch operations without an explosion in the number of opcodes. I still need to think about whether this is a good idea or not.
2017-09-06Continue work on IR-based codegenTim Foley
This gets us far enough that we can convert a single test case to use the IR, under the new `-use-ir` flag. Getting this merged into mainline will at least ensure that we keep the IR path working in a minimal fashion, even when we have to add functionality the existing AST-based path There is definitely some clutter here from keeping both IR-based and AST-based translation around, but I don't want to have a long-lived branch for the IR that gets further and further away from the `master` branch that is actually getting used and tested. Summary of changes: - Add pointer types and basic `load` operation to be able to handle variable declarations - Add basic `call` instruction type - Add simple address math for field reference in l-value - Always add IR for referenced decls to global scope - Add notion of "intrinsic" type modifier, which maps a type declaration directly to an IR opcode (plus optional literal operands to handle things like texture/sampler flavor) - Improve printing of IR instructions, types, operands - Add constant-buffer type to IR - Allow any instruction to be detected as "should be folded into use sites" and use this to tag things of constant-buffer type - Also add logic for implicit base on member expressions, to handle references to `cbuffer` members - Add connection back to original decl to IR variables (including global shader parameters...) - Use reflection name instead of true name when emitting HLSL from IR (so that we can match HLSL output) - Make IR include decorations for type layout - Re-use existing emit logic for HLSL semantics to output `register` semantics for IR-based code - Make IR-based codegen be an option we can enable from the command line - It still isn't on by default (it can barely manage a trivial shader), but it seems better to enable it always instead of putting it under an `#ifdef` - Fix up how we check for intrinsic operations suring AST-based cross compilation so that adding new intrinsic ops for the IR won't break codegen.
2017-07-13An array of resources in Vulkan only consumes one bindingTim Foley
Fixes #84 - When computing resource usage for an array type, don't multiply the resource usage of the element type by the element count foor descriptor-table-slot resources. - When reporting the "stride" of an array type through reflection, report the stride for descriptor table slots as zero, always.
2017-06-14AppVeyor: Run tests as part of AppVeyor buildsTim Foley
This includes a bunch of related changes: - `slang-test` - Add a notion of an "output mode" that specifies whether we output to console (the default), or invoke the apprpriate AppVeyor command to update test status - Add a notion of test categories, so that tests can be tagged with categories, and then we can invoke only those tets in a given category, or choose to *exclude* tests with specific categories - Allow the `OSProcessSpawner` to look up an executable by "path" (meaning a full path is expected) or by "name" (meaning it should be allowed to look in the current directory, `PATH` environment variable, etc.). This was important to make sure that I can run `appveyor` without having to know its absolute path. - AppVeyor configuration - Change badge to reflect new build account for organization (rather than a single-user account) - Remove attempt to set AppVeyor build version in a clever way, since it breaks links from GitHub to AppVeyor - Change order or configurations in the build matrix to front-load the Release build (which has the main tests) - Turn on `fast_finish` flag so we don't have to wait as long for failed builds - Turn on `parallel` builds - Set `verbosity: minimal` to avoid getting build spew about Xamarin stuff I'm not using - Add custom `test_script` to invoke `test.bat` - Sets the test category based on teh build configuration, so we don't run the full test suite on every input. - `test.bat` - Allow for `-platform` and `-configuration` arguments - Rewrute a platform of `Win32` over to `x86` to match how the output directories are named - Futz around with how the directories are being passed along to work around annoying `.bat` file quoting behavior (I still don't get how batch files work) - Tests - Mark a bunch of tests as `smoke` tests - Mark the relevant tests as `render` tests (these get filtered out for AppVeyor builds)
2017-06-09Initial import of code.Tim Foley