diff options
| author | Tim Foley <tfoleyNV@users.noreply.github.com> | 2020-07-24 18:12:41 -0700 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | GitHub <noreply@github.com> | 2020-07-24 18:12:41 -0700 |
| commit | 87940a649e3b4f757905015de95225d57ec2f27c (patch) | |
| tree | 189ec1c515bd1180822e8887817c0f235a51c617 /source/slang/slang-check-overload.cpp | |
| parent | 261fe7587d7413070a4e0f29e1a1bb7b0d2b5429 (diff) | |
Fix bugs related to mutating implementations of interface methods (#1461)
There are two main bug fixes here:
* We were failing to diagnose when code calls a `[mutating]` method on a value that doesn't support mutation (that is an r-value instead of an l-value).
* We had a bug in the synthesis logic for interface requirements where we used the *result* type of the requirement in place of each of the *parameter* types.
The second bug made synthesis often produce incorrect signatures with `void` parameters.
The first bug meant that even though a `[mutating]` method should not be able to satisfy a non-`[mutating]` method (and we had code to enforce this for the "exact match" case), when we go on to try and synthesize a non-`[mutating]` method that satisfies the requirement by delegating to the user-written one, it would end up succeeding, because nothing was stopping a non-`[mutating]` method from calling a `[mutating]` one.
In each case this code adds a fix and a test case to confirm it.
Diffstat (limited to 'source/slang/slang-check-overload.cpp')
| -rw-r--r-- | source/slang/slang-check-overload.cpp | 49 |
1 files changed, 46 insertions, 3 deletions
diff --git a/source/slang/slang-check-overload.cpp b/source/slang/slang-check-overload.cpp index 69baf9f75..0a1294965 100644 --- a/source/slang/slang-check-overload.cpp +++ b/source/slang/slang-check-overload.cpp @@ -358,11 +358,54 @@ namespace Slang return true; } + bool isEffectivelyMutating(CallableDecl* decl) + { + if(decl->hasModifier<MutatingAttribute>()) + return true; + + if(decl->hasModifier<NonmutatingAttribute>()) + return false; + + if(as<SetterDecl>(decl)) + return true; + + return false; + } + bool SemanticsVisitor::TryCheckOverloadCandidateDirections( - OverloadResolveContext& /*context*/, - OverloadCandidate const& /*candidate*/) + OverloadResolveContext& context, + OverloadCandidate const& candidate) { - // TODO(tfoley): check `in` and `out` markers, as needed. + if(candidate.flavor != OverloadCandidate::Flavor::Func) + return true; + + auto funcDeclRef = candidate.item.declRef.as<CallableDecl>(); + SLANG_ASSERT(funcDeclRef); + + // Note: This operation was originally introduced as + // a place to add checking around l-value-ness of arguments + // and parameters, but currently that checking is being + // done in other places. + // + // For now we will only use this step to check the + // mutability of the `this` parameter where necessary. + // + if(!isEffectivelyStatic(funcDeclRef.getDecl())) + { + if(isEffectivelyMutating(funcDeclRef.getDecl())) + { + if(context.baseExpr && !context.baseExpr->type.isLeftValue) + { + if(context.mode == OverloadResolveContext::Mode::ForReal) + { + getSink()->diagnose(context.loc, Diagnostics::mutatingMethodOnImmutableValue, funcDeclRef.getName()); + maybeDiagnoseThisNotLValue(context.baseExpr); + } + return false; + } + } + } + return true; } |
