diff options
| author | Tim Foley <tfoley@nvidia.com> | 2017-07-08 17:04:31 -0700 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Tim Foley <tfoley@nvidia.com> | 2017-07-08 18:22:26 -0700 |
| commit | 6233f9b35f1901ca33c53ce37f9b1517e91e1d79 (patch) | |
| tree | ba7171bfe69a81a8425795e77f75a093a7a95e90 /source/slang/parser.cpp | |
| parent | c77c0390d8da6c1769e0a9c5b2f862b3598d9b8f (diff) | |
Revise how hidden implicit casts are recognized.
The old approach used an `isRewriter` flag in the emit logic, but I kind of need that flag to go away.
Instead, I now how the semantic checking pass detect whether an implicitly-generated type cast is in rewriter code, and if so it uses the new `HiddenImplicitCastExpr` AST node.
The emit logic then looks for that specific node and eliminates it.
Diffstat (limited to 'source/slang/parser.cpp')
| -rw-r--r-- | source/slang/parser.cpp | 2 |
1 files changed, 1 insertions, 1 deletions
diff --git a/source/slang/parser.cpp b/source/slang/parser.cpp index 2056bf809..0efc8cd77 100644 --- a/source/slang/parser.cpp +++ b/source/slang/parser.cpp @@ -3092,7 +3092,7 @@ namespace Slang if (peekTypeName(parser) && parser->LookAheadToken(TokenType::RParent, 1)) { - RefPtr<TypeCastExpressionSyntaxNode> tcexpr = new TypeCastExpressionSyntaxNode(); + RefPtr<TypeCastExpressionSyntaxNode> tcexpr = new ExplicitCastExpr(); parser->FillPosition(tcexpr.Ptr()); tcexpr->TargetType = parser->ParseTypeExp(); parser->ReadToken(TokenType::RParent); |
