summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/source/slang/check.cpp
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorTim Foley <tfoleyNV@users.noreply.github.com>2018-04-20 16:56:33 -0700
committerGitHub <noreply@github.com>2018-04-20 16:56:33 -0700
commit2f782d403ae5729b6c93fbe92577ee01f7a8d608 (patch)
tree4f523901b8c07515dfc5d323873321746cf85ddf /source/slang/check.cpp
parentc73ccbc5616dff16ecacb9198f725f498a7e6c84 (diff)
Diagnose use of an implicit cast as an argument for an `out` parameter (#516)
Work on #499 Two big fixes here: * The logic for checking constraints on `out` arguments wasn't actually triggering because it relied on function parameters being given an `OutType` if they are marked `out`, but the code wasn't actually doing that. Fixing the computation of types for functions resolved that issue. * Next, I added a specific diagnostic to follow up the "expected an l-value" error to let the user know that their argument was implicitly converted, and that is why it doesn't count as an l-value in Slang's rules. I've added a test case to ensure that we retain this diagnostic until we can do a true fix for the issue. The right long-term fix is to have an AST representation of all the implicit casts involved (e.g., in both directions for an `inout` parameter), and then have the IR generate explicit code for the conversions in each direction (the `LoweredVal` representation can handle this sort of thing).
Diffstat (limited to 'source/slang/check.cpp')
-rw-r--r--source/slang/check.cpp36
1 files changed, 30 insertions, 6 deletions
diff --git a/source/slang/check.cpp b/source/slang/check.cpp
index 67b628596..acf473998 100644
--- a/source/slang/check.cpp
+++ b/source/slang/check.cpp
@@ -6738,13 +6738,37 @@ namespace Slang
auto paramType = funcType->getParamType(pp);
if (auto outParamType = paramType->As<OutTypeBase>())
{
- if (pp < expr->Arguments.Count()
- && !expr->Arguments[pp]->type.IsLeftValue)
+ if( pp < expr->Arguments.Count() )
{
- getSink()->diagnose(
- expr->Arguments[pp],
- Diagnostics::argumentExpectedLValue,
- pp);
+ auto argExpr = expr->Arguments[pp];
+ if( !argExpr->type.IsLeftValue )
+ {
+ getSink()->diagnose(
+ argExpr,
+ Diagnostics::argumentExpectedLValue,
+ pp);
+
+ if( auto implicitCastExpr = argExpr.As<ImplicitCastExpr>() )
+ {
+ getSink()->diagnose(
+ argExpr,
+ Diagnostics::implicitCastUsedAsLValue,
+ implicitCastExpr->Arguments[0]->type,
+ implicitCastExpr->type);
+ }
+ }
+ }
+ else
+ {
+ // This implies that the function had an `out`
+ // or `inout` parameter and they gave it a default
+ // argument expression. I'm not even sure what
+ // that would mean.
+ //
+ // TODO: make sure this gets validated on the
+ // declaring side.
+ //
+ SLANG_DIAGNOSE_UNEXPECTED(getSink(), invoke, "default argument expression for out/inout paameter");
}
}
}