Improve support for interfaces as shader parameters (#886)

* Improve support for interfaces as shader parameters

This change adds two main things over the existing support:

1. It is now possible to plug in concrete types that actually contain (uniform/ordinary) fields for the existential type parameters introduced by interface-type shader parameters. The `interface-shader-param2.slang` test shows that this works.

2. There is a limited amount of support for doing correct layout computation and generating output code that matches that layout, so that interface and ordinary-type fields can be interleaved to a limited extent. The `interface-shader-param3.slang` test confirms this behavior.

There are several moving pieces in the change.

* When it comes to terminology, we try to draw a more clear distinction between existial type parameters/arguments and existential/object value parametes/arguments. A simple way to look at it is that an `IFoo[3]` shader parameter introduces a single existential type parameter (so that a concrete type argument like `SomeThing` can be plugged in for the `IFoo`) but introduces three existential object/value parameters (to represent the concrete values for the array elements).

* At the IR level, we support a few new operations. A `BindExistentialsType` can take a type that is not itself an interface/existential type but which depends on interfaces/existentials (e.g., `ConstantBuffer<IFoo>`) and plug in the concrete types to be used for its existential type slots.

* Then a `wrapExistentials` instruction can take a type with all the existentials plugged in (possibly by `BindExistentialsType`) and wrap it into a value of the existential-using type (e.g., turn `ConstantBuffer<SomeThing>` into a `ConstantBuffer<IFoo>`).

* The IR passes for doing generic/existential specialization have been updated to be able to desugar uses of these new operations just enough so that a `ConstantBuffer<IFoo>` can be used.

* When we specialize an IR parameter of an interface type like `IFoo` based on a concrete type `SomeThing`, we turn the parameter into an `ExistentialBox<SomeThing>` to reflect the fact that we are conceptually referring to `SomeThing` indirectly (it shouldn't be factored into the layout of its surrounding type).

* Parameter binding was updated so that it passes along the bound existential type arguments in a `Program` or `EntryPoint` to type layout, so that we can take them into account. The type layout code needs to do a little work to pass the appropriate range of arguments along to sub-fields when computing layout for aggregate types.

* Type layout was updated to have a notion of "pending" items, which represent the concrete types of data that are logically being referenced by existential value slots. The basic idea is that these values aren't included in the layout of a type by default, but then they get "flushed" to come after all the non-existential-related data in a constant buffer, parameter block, etc.

* The logic for computing a parameter group (`ConstantBuffer` or `ParameterBlock`) layout was updated to always "flush" the pending items on the element type of the group, so that the resource usage of specialized existential slots would be taken into account.

* The type legalization pass has been adapted so that we can derive two different passes from it. One does resource-type legalization (which is all that the original pass did). The new pass uses the same basic machinery to legalize `ExistentialBox<T>` types by moving them out of their containing type(s), and then turning them into ordinary variables/parameters of type `T`.

Big things missing from this change include:

- Nothing is making sure that "pending" items at the global or entry-point level will get proper registers/bindings allocated to them. For the uniform case, all that matters in the current compiler is that we declare them in the right order in the output HLSL/GLSL, but for resources to be supported we will need to compute this layout information and start associating it with the existential/interface-type fields.

- Nothing is being done to support `BindExistentials<S, ...>` where `S` is a `struct` type that might have existential-type fields (or nested fields...). Eventually we need to desugar a type like this into a fresh `struct` type that has the same field keys as `S`, but with fields replaced by suitable `BindExistentials` as needed. (The hard part of this would seem to be computing which slots go to which fields). As a practial matter, this missing feature means that interface-type members of `cbuffer` declarations won't work.

The current tests carefully avoid both of these problems. They don't declare any buffer/texture fields in the concrete types, and they don't make use of `cbuffer` declarations or `ConstantBuffer`s over structure types with interface-type fields.

* fixup: add override to methods

* fixup: typos

1 files changed, 1 insertions, 1 deletions

diff --git a/examples/model-viewer/main.cpp b/examples/model-viewer/main.cpp
index 8bbc8c979..66a53c245 100644
--- a/examples/model-viewer/main.cpp
+++ b/examples/model-viewer/main.cpp
@@ -195,7 +195,7 @@ RefPtr<EntryPoint> loadEntryPoint(
 // Along with the entry points themselves, the `Program` object will
 // cache information gleaned from Slang's reflection interface. Notably:
 //
-// * The number of `ParamterBlock`s that the program uses
+// * The number of `ParameterBlock`s that the program uses
 // * Information about generic (type) parameters
 //
 struct Program : RefObject