From 5f8475bee2589b8e851c856135cf10758e859e72 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Sai Praveen Bangaru <31557731+saipraveenb25@users.noreply.github.com>
Date: Mon, 28 Jul 2025 15:29:58 -0400
Subject: Fix issue in multi-level break elimination by handling multi-level
 continue statements (#7953)

---
 tests/bugs/gh-7748-switch-continue-bug.slang | 45 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 45 insertions(+)
 create mode 100644 tests/bugs/gh-7748-switch-continue-bug.slang

(limited to 'tests')

diff --git a/tests/bugs/gh-7748-switch-continue-bug.slang b/tests/bugs/gh-7748-switch-continue-bug.slang
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..4feca7180
--- /dev/null
+++ b/tests/bugs/gh-7748-switch-continue-bug.slang
@@ -0,0 +1,45 @@
+//TEST:COMPARE_COMPUTE(filecheck-buffer=CHECK):-output-using-type -cpu
+
+// Regression test for issue #7748: Dictionary key collision in multi-level break processing
+// This test specifically exercises the case of "continue inside a switch that is inside a for loop"
+// which was identified as the root cause of the dictionary collision issue.
+
+int testContinueInSwitchInLoop(int value) {
+    int result = 0;
+
+    for (int i = 0; i < 3; ++i) {
+        switch (value) {
+            case 0:
+                result += 1;
+                continue; // This continue should go to the for loop
+            case 1:
+                result += 2;
+                break; // This break goes to the switch
+            default:
+                result += 3;
+                break;
+        }
+        result += 10; // This should be skipped when continue is used
+    }
+
+    return result;
+}
+
+int processValues() {
+    int sum = 0;
+    sum += testContinueInSwitchInLoop(0); // Should be 3 (1+1+1, no +10s due to continue)
+    sum += testContinueInSwitchInLoop(1); // Should be 36 (2+10, 2+10, 2+10)  
+    sum += testContinueInSwitchInLoop(2); // Should be 39 (3+10, 3+10, 3+10)
+    return sum;
+}
+
+//TEST_INPUT:ubuffer(data=[0], stride=4):out,name=outputBuffer
+RWStructuredBuffer<int> outputBuffer;
+
+[shader("compute")]
+[numthreads(1, 1, 1)]  
+void computeMain() {
+    int result = processValues();
+    outputBuffer[0] = result;
+    //CHECK: 78
+}
\ No newline at end of file
-- 
cgit v1.2.3