From 0f55649cc1aa8ad3218b7f8ba7b1eabdd2ec6526 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Tim Foley <tfoleyNV@users.noreply.github.com>
Date: Fri, 8 Dec 2017 14:23:12 -0800
Subject: Cleanups to `ParameterBlock<T>` behavior. (#304)

* Cleanups to `ParameterBlock<T>` behavior.

These add some more realistic tests using the `ParameterBlock<T>` support, and show that it can work with the "rewriter" mode.

Unfortunately, this code does *not* currently work with the rewriter + the IR at once. That will need to be fixed in a follow-on change, because I now see that the root problem is pretty ugly.

* cleanup
---
 .../compute/rewriter-parameter-block-complex.slang  | 21 +++++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 21 insertions(+)
 create mode 100644 tests/compute/rewriter-parameter-block-complex.slang

(limited to 'tests/compute/rewriter-parameter-block-complex.slang')

diff --git a/tests/compute/rewriter-parameter-block-complex.slang b/tests/compute/rewriter-parameter-block-complex.slang
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..826dd5047
--- /dev/null
+++ b/tests/compute/rewriter-parameter-block-complex.slang
@@ -0,0 +1,21 @@
+// rewriter-parameter-block.slang
+//TEST_IGNORE_FILE:
+
+// A type that mixes uniform and resource fields
+struct Data
+{
+	int val;
+	RWStructuredBuffer<int> buf;
+};
+
+// A function that uses that type
+int test(Data data, int val)
+{
+	return data.val + data.buf[val];
+}
+
+cbuffer C
+{
+	ParameterBlock<Data> gA;
+	Data gB;
+};
-- 
cgit v1.2.3