From 1f401d04e32c6feaeb35243ea5bfc2b14520344b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: jsmall-nvidia <jsmall@nvidia.com>
Date: Thu, 20 Feb 2020 18:24:00 -0500
Subject: WIP on RWTexture types on CUDA/CPU (#1234)

* CUDA support for array of resources.

* * Add support for Texture2DArray on CPU
* Expand texture-simple.slang to test Texture2DArray

* Reorganise CUDAComputeUtil to split out createTextureResource.

* Add TextureCubeArray support for CPU/CUDA targets.

* Pulled out CUDAResource
Renamed derived classes to reflect that change.

* Creation of SurfObject type.

* Functions to return read/write access for simplifying future additions.

* WIP for RWTexture access on CPU/CUDA.

* CUsurfObject cannot have mips.

* Ability to set number of mips on test data.
Preliminary support for CUsurfObj and RWTexture1D on CUDA.
CUDA docs improvements.

* Fix typo.
---
 source/slang/hlsl.meta.slang | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

(limited to 'source/slang/hlsl.meta.slang')

diff --git a/source/slang/hlsl.meta.slang b/source/slang/hlsl.meta.slang
index 988c6f69c..c3339cbb5 100644
--- a/source/slang/hlsl.meta.slang
+++ b/source/slang/hlsl.meta.slang
@@ -1433,7 +1433,7 @@ __generic<T : __BuiltinType, let N : int, let M : int> uint4 WaveMatch(matrix<T,
 
 // TODO(JS): For CUDA the article claims mask has to be used carefully
 // https://devblogs.nvidia.com/using-cuda-warp-level-primitives/
-// With the Warp intrinsics there is though mask, and it's just the 'active lanes'. So __activemask()
+// With the Warp intrinsics there is no mask, and it's just the 'active lanes'. So __activemask()
 // seems to be appropriate.
 
 __target_intrinsic(cuda, "(__all_sync(__activemask(), $0) != 0)") 
-- 
cgit v1.2.3