From f8c69050b08c19b269edf2a8cf246f9724a8fef7 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Tim Foley <tfoley@nvidia.com>
Date: Mon, 10 Jul 2017 15:02:47 -0700
Subject: Handle function name properly for unchecked call

The emit logic was checking for a missing decl, and then asking that same (missing) declaration for its name.
---
 source/slang/emit.cpp | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

(limited to 'source/slang/emit.cpp')

diff --git a/source/slang/emit.cpp b/source/slang/emit.cpp
index 05503265a..b2366f564 100644
--- a/source/slang/emit.cpp
+++ b/source/slang/emit.cpp
@@ -1598,7 +1598,7 @@ struct EmitVisitor
             auto funcDecl = funcDeclRef.getDecl();
             if(!funcDecl)
             {
-                emitUncheckedCallExpr(callExpr, funcDeclRef.GetName(), arg);
+                emitUncheckedCallExpr(callExpr, funcDeclRefExpr->name, arg);
                 return;
             }
             else if (auto intrinsicOpModifier = funcDecl->FindModifier<IntrinsicOpModifier>())
-- 
cgit v1.2.3