| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
* More fixups for parameter block binding generation
The bug in this case arises when there is both a parameter block and global-scope resources, all of which are relying on automatic binding assignment. If the parameter block is the first global-scope parameter that gets encountered, then it is possible for it to allocate regsiter space/set zero for itself, which confuses the logic for handling other global-scope parameters (which assumes that *they* get space/set zero).
I've also made some fixup to the reflection test harness and reflection API code:
- Have the hardness handle register-space allocations when printing, and be sure to only show their `index` and not their `space` (since that would be redundant)
- Have the reflection API only auto-redirect queries on a parameter group type layout to its container type layout *if* the container type layout has a non-zero number of resource allocations. The problem that arises here is a `ParameterBlock<X>` where `X` doesn't contain any uniforms, so that no container is needed. In that case the container ends up with no resource allocation(s).
* Fixups for test failures.
- The thread-group size tests failed because they had shader parameters with no resources to back them (built-in `SV_` inputs), and the printing of those changed. I fixed up the baseline, but also had to fix a few bugs in the reflection test fixture's printing logic.
- The GLSL parameter block test revealed a corner case of the existing logic: because we always need to generate a binding for the "hack" sampler (even if code doesn't end up needing it), and that sampler should always go in the "default" set (should be set zero), the user's `ParameterBlock` will always end up as `set=1` or later, even if there are no other global-scope parameters.
- This will be fixed once we don't have to rely on glslang's annoying behavior in this one case, either because glslang gets fixed, or because we implement our own SPIR-V codegen.
|
|
* Cleanups to `ParameterBlock<T>` behavior.
These add some more realistic tests using the `ParameterBlock<T>` support, and show that it can work with the "rewriter" mode.
Unfortunately, this code does *not* currently work with the rewriter + the IR at once. That will need to be fixed in a follow-on change, because I now see that the root problem is pretty ugly.
* cleanup
|
|
Fixes #301
The problem here is that if you have input GLSL code like:
```glsl
// example.vs
in vec3 pos;
```
and:
```glsl
// example.fs
in vec3 worldPos;
```
Then both `pos` and `worldPos` are reflected as global variables (parameters of the *program*), which both get bound to "varying input" resources, but there is no way to tell through the API that `pos` is a vertex parameter while `worldPos` is a fragment one.
The original request in issue #301 was to expose parameters like this not as a global variables, but rather as parameters of the entry point in their specific file. That is, treat it as if the user had written, e.g.:
```glsl
// example.vs
void vsMain(in vec3 pos) { ... }
```
Doing that would unify the GLSL and HLSL/Slang cases a bit, but would require the Slang reflection API to lie about the structure of code the user wrote. At a more basic level, that would have been hard to implement because the current reflection API just exposes the underlying AST, and the AST *needs* to leave `pos` at the global scope so that when we go and spit GLSL back out we retain the original structure.
This PR implements a more simplistic solution, where the user is allowed to query the stage that a varying parameter "belongs" to. For right now I'm only enabling this to work for varying parameters (but it doesn't care if they are entry-point or global-scope varyings). Despite what I said on #301, this should work for both the top-level parameter's variable layout, *and* any variable layouts for fields within its type reflection.
In terms of implementation, I took the simple but wasteful route: every `VarLayout` now has a `stage` field that is by default initialized to `SLANG_STAGE_NONE`. When collecting varying parameters, I take advantage of the fact that everything bottlenecks through `processEntryPointParameter()` which takes an `EntryPointParameterState` so that I can set the `VarLayout::stage` field for any varying parameter in one place.
While I was making this change, I also did a bit of cleanup so that the "official" names for the varying parameter categories are `VARYING_INPUT` and `VARYING_OUTPUT`, with `VERTEX_INPUT` and `FRAGMENT_OUTPUT` being "deprecated" in principle. I didn't do the bulk rename inside the codebase yet.
|
|
This is currently only useful for `struct` types.
I implemented a special-case exception so that the auto-generated `struct` types used for `cbuffer` members don't show their internal name.
I did *not* implement any logic to avoid returning the name `vector` for a vector type, etc., since they are all `DeclRefType`s and it seemed easiest to just let the user access information they can't really use.
|
|
This is functionality required to support a Falcor bug fix.
Most of the code to compute the right semantic name/index for a parameter was already present.
This change adds:
- Storage for semantic name/index on every `VarLayout`
- Note: this is wasteful and should be optimized later
- A public API to query the semantic name/index
- The contract is that this API returns `NULL` if the parameter had no semantic
- A bit of work in `parameter-binding.cpp` to attach semantics to varying input/output when traversing varying parameters.
- Note: this is intentionally set up so that it associates semantics even with non-leaf parameters, so that an API user can query the semantic of a `struct` parameter and know that its members will be assigned sequential semantic indices from its starting value.
- Support for dumping this information in reflection tests
One notable thing that I did *not* change here is that the reflection test fixture doesn't report information on the output of an entry point, even though it really should. That should be fixed in a separate change, though, because it would affect many of the expected outputs.
|
|
Move reflection JSON generation into separate test fixture
|
