summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/tools/render-test/render-d3d11.cpp
Commit message (Collapse)AuthorAge
...
* First attempt at a Linux build (#193)Tim Foley2017-09-27
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | * First attempt at a Linux build - Fix up places where C++ idioms were written assuming lenient behavior of Microsoft's compiler - Add a few more alternatives for platform-specific behavior where Windows was the only platform accounted for. - Add a basic Makefile that can at least invoke our build, even if it isn't going good dependency tracking, etc. - Build `libslang.so` and `slangc` that depends on it, using a relative `RPATH` to make the binary portable (I hope) - Add an initial `.travis.yml` to see if we can trigger their build process. * Fixup: const bug in `List::Sort` I'm not clear why this gets picked up by the gcc *and* clang that Travis uses, but not the (newer) gcc I'm using on Ubuntu here, but I'm hoping it is just some missing `const` qualifiers. * Fixup: reorder specialization of "class info" Clang complains about things being specialized after being instantiated (implicilty), and I hope it is just the fact that I generate the class info for the roots of the hierarchy after the other cases. We'll see. * Fixup: add `platform.cpp` to unified/lumped build * Fixup: Windows uses `FreeLibrary` and not `UnloadLibrary` * Fixup: fix Windows project file to include new source file This obviously points to the fact that we are going to need to be generating these files sooner or later.
* Use WARP for D3D rendering tests.Tim Foley2017-09-21
| | | | | | This should in principle allow for the D3D-only tests to run on AppVeyor so that we can validate running things for CI purposes (and is probably a whole lot easier than trying to plug the VM up to the rendering tests). I've switched up one of the tests so that it should run even on AppVeyor, so fingers crossed that it will actually run.
* Fix many warnings-as-errors issues.Tim Foley2017-07-06
| | | | | The code should now compile cleanly with warnings as errors for VS2015 with `W3`. Most of the changes had to do with propagating a real pointer-sized integer type through code that had been using `int`.
* Start to support cross-compilation via "lowering" passTim Foley2017-07-06
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - The big change here is the introduction of a "lowering" pass that takes an input AST from the semantic checker, and produces an output AST suitable for emitting. The intention is that he lowering pass is responsible for: - Stripping out unused code (when we have enough information to do so), by only outputting declarations that are transitively references from an entry point - When cross-compiling to GLSL, generating a suitable `void main()` entry point to wrap the user-written entry-point function - (Eventually) legalizing types in the program, by scalarizing aggregate types that mix uniform and resource types - (Eventually) instantiating generic declarations so that the resulting code only deals with fully specialized declarations - (Eventually) de-sugaring OOP constructs into basic "structs and functions" form - (Eventually) instantiating code that depends on interface types at the concrete types chosen - It is clear that there is still a lot of work to be done there, to this change is really about getting infrastructure in place without breaking the existing test cases. - One cleanup here is that we get rid of the idea of whole-translation-unit output, since that was specific to HLSL output, and there is really no strong reason for keeping it. Users should now just ask for the output for each entry point that they wanted to generate. - The biggest source of complexity for the lowering process is that it needs to produce the same AST structure as the input, to deal with the complexity of the rewriter case. That is, we need the output to be able to reproduce the input exactly in the case where we are rewriting and nothing needs to change, so the output format needs at least the degrees of freedom of the input. - As a result, we end up having to distinguish "rewriter" and "full" modes in both lowering and code-emit steps, so that we can react appropriately. - Generating a GLSL `main()` also adds a lot of complexity. Right now I'm using the simplest approach, where we always output the Slang/HLSL entry point as an ordinary function (as written) and then emit a simple GLSL `main()` to call it. I generate globals for all the shader inputs/outputs (these need to be scalarized and have explicit `location`s attached), and then collect these into the `struct` types of the original parameters as needed. - This approach will start to have some major down-sides once we have to deal with "arrayed" input/output - A long-term question here is how to replace entry-point parameter types with scalarized and/or "transposed" versions, while still letting the original code work as written (including copying those inputs to temporary arrays) - Split `BlockStatementSyntaxNode` into: - `BlockStmt` which just provides a scope around a `body` statement - `SeqStmt` which just allows multiple statements to be treated as one - Change how we emit `for` loops, to deal with the case where the initialization part might expand into multiple statements - Basically `for(A;B;C) {D}` becomes `{A; for(;B;C) {D}}`, so we can handle arbitrary statements for `A` - As an additional wrinkle, when we are rewriting HLSL, we just generate `A; for(;B;C) {D}` to deal with the broken scoping there - This change is needed because the lowering pass was sometimes expanding the original initialization statement `A` into a block `{A}`. Certainly if it declared multiple variables we'd need to handle it, and this seemed the easiest way - A more significant challenge for lowering would come if/when we ever wanted to support true short-circuiting behavior for `&&` and `||` - For right now I'm not changing the behavior of the "rewriter" mode, so we still have `UnparsedStmt` instances being generated, but it is clear that eventually we need to parse *all* input, even if we can't type-check 100% of it. This is required so that we can rewrite user code that might refer to a shader input with interface type.
* Overhaul handling of entry points and translation units.Tim Foley2017-06-20
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | The main user-visible change here is that instead of `spAddTranslationUnitEntryPoint` we have `spAddEntryPoint`, to reflect that the list of entry points is "global" to a compile request. As a result, `spGetEntryPointSource` now only needs the entry point index, and not the translation unit index. There are a bunch more behind-the-scenes changes, though, reflecting a streamlining of the concepts related to compilation into a smaller number of classes. Now there is: - `Session` (unchanged) to manage the lifetimes of shared stuff like the stdlib - `CompileRequest` (merges in `CompileOptions`) to handle all the lifetime related to a single invocation of the compiler - `TranslationUnitRequest` (merges `TranslationUnitOptions`, `CompileUnit`) to represent a single translation unit ("module") that the user is trying to compile. This is a single file for HLSL/GLSL, but can be multiple files for Slang. - `EntryPointRequest` (merges `EntryPointOption` and a bit of `EntryPointResult`) to track a single entry point that the user is asking to compile (that entry point always comes from a single translation unit) A lot of functions used to take some combination of these and end up with really long signatures. I've given most of the objects "parent" pointers so that they can get back to all the context they need, so most functions don't need as many parameters. It may eventually be important to tease these apart again, in particular: - The code-generation side of things (the `*Result` types) might need to be pulled out in case we want to codegen multiple times from the same AST - Similarly, the layout stuff may also need to be pulled out, in case we want to lay things out multiple times with different rules.
* GLSL: get GLSL limping in `render-test`Tim Foley2017-06-12
| | | | | | The test case that is there right now is nominally a cross-compilation test, but for right now it uses the preprocessor to present completely different code for HLSL and GLSL compilation. This change is really just fleshing out the OpenGL side of `render-test` enough that it can produce images using OpenGL to enable further testing.
* Initial import of code.Tim Foley2017-06-09