| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
* Made bad-operaor-call available on all targets.
Fix the line filename to not inclue path, to avoid paths being absolute and therefores value be host environment dependent (causing tests to fail).
* Disable on linux because theres still a problem on gcc x86 where the file path is different.
* Fix to some typos in bad-operator-call.slang
* Fix diagnostic for bad-operator-call.slang
|
|
* Working matrix swizzle.
Supports one and zero indexing and multiple elements.
Performs semantic checking of the swizzle. Matrix swizzles are
transformed into a vector of indexing operations during lowering to the
IR.
This change does not handle matrix swizzle as lvalues.
* Renaming
* Added missing semicolon
* Initialize variable for gcc
* Added the expect file for diagnostics
* Matrix swizzle updated per PR feedback
* Stylistic fix
* Formatting fixes
* Fix compiling with AST change.
Change indentation.
Co-authored-by: jsmall-nvidia <jsmall@nvidia.com>
|
|
Currently we fail to diagnose code that calls an instance method from a static method using implicit `this`, and instead crash during lowering of the AST to the IR.
This change introduces a bit more detail to the "this parameter mode" that is computed during lookup, so that it differentiates three cases. The existing two cases of a mutable `this` and immutable `this` remain, but we add a third case where the "this parameter mode" only allows for a reference to the `This` type.
When turning lookup "breadcrumb" information into actual expressions, we respect this setting to construct either a `This` or `this` expression.
In order to actually diagnose the incorrect reference, I had to add code around an existing `TODO` comment that noted how we should diagnose attempts to refer to instance members through a type. Enabling that diagnostic revealed a missing case needed by generics (including those in the stdlib) - a type-constraint member is always referenced statically.
Putting the diagnostic for a static reference to a non-static member in its new bottleneck location meant that some code higher up the call static that handles explicit static member references had to be tweaked to not produce double error messages.
This change includes a new diagnostic test to show that we now give an error message on code that makes this mistake, instead of crashing.
|
|
causing a crash (#1329)
* * Make a 'definition' if a function has a body or a target intrinsic defined
* Added test for this situation.
* Fix tab.
* Fix single-target-intrisic.slang expected output.
Co-authored-by: Tim Foley <tfoleyNV@users.noreply.github.com>
|
|
* Added CPU support for GetDimensions on C++/CPU target.
Added texture-get-dimension.slang test
* Fix some typos.
* Update CUDA docs.
* Fix output of GetDimensions on glsl when has an array.
Disabled VK - because VK renderer doesn't support createTextureView
* Fix typo.
* Fix typo.
* Fix bad-operator-call diagnostics output.
|
|
* Remove RWTextureCube and RWTextureCubeArray - as not supported.
Put multisample code in a block to make nesting more readable.
* Replace a tab.
* Update bad-operator-call.slang.expected
|
|
* Define compound intrinsic ops in the standard library
The current stdlib code has a notion of "compound" intrinsic ops, which use the `__intrinsic_op` modifier but don't actually map to a single IR instruction.
Instead, most* of these map to multiple IR instructions using hard-coded logic in `slang-ir-lower.cpp`.
(* One special case is `kCompoundOp_Pos` that is used for unary `operator+` and that maps to *zero* IR instructions)
All of the opcodes that used to use the `kCompoundOp_` enumeration values now have definitions directly in the stdlib and use the new `[__unsafeForceInlineEarly]` attribute to ensure that they get inlined into their use sites so that the output code is as close as possible to the original.
For the most part, generating the stdlib definitions for the compound ops is straightforward, but here's some notes:
* The unary `operator+` I just defined directly in Slang code, since it doesn't share much structure with other cases
* The unary increment/decrement ops are generated as a cross product of increment/decrement and prefix/postfix. The logic is a bit messy but given that we have scalar, vector, and matrix versions to deal with it still saves code overall
* Because all the compound/assignment cases got moved out, the existing code for generating unary/binary ops can be simplified a bit
* All the no-op bit-cast operations like `asfloat(float)` are now inline identity functions
* A few other small cleanups are made by not having to worry about the compound ops (which used to be called "pseudo ops") sometimes being encoded in to the same type of value as a real IR opcode.
The one big detail here is a fix for how IR lowering works for `let` declarations: they were previously being `materialize()`d which only guarantees that they've been placed in a contiguous and addressable location, but doesn't actually convert them to an r-value. As a result a `let` declaration could accidentally capture a mutable location by reference, which is definitely *not* what we wanted it to do. Fixing this was needed to make the new postfix `++` definition work (several existing tests end up covering this).
One important forward-looking note:
One subtle (but significant) choice in this change is that we actually reduce the number of declarations in the stdlib, because instead of having the compound operators include both per-type and generic overloads (just listing scalar cases for now):
float operator+=(in out float left, float right) { ... }
int operator+=(in out int left, int right) { ... }
...
T operator+= <T:__BuiltinBlahBlah>(in out T left, T right) { ... }
We now have *only* the single generic version:
T operator+= <T:__BuiltinBlahBlah>(in out T left, T right) { ... }
In running our current tests, this change didn't lead to any regressions (perhaps surprisingly).
Given that we were able to reduce the number of overloads for `operator+=` by a factor of N (where N is the number of built-in types), it seems worth considering whether we could also reduce the number of overloads of `operator+` by the same factor by only having generic rather than per-type versions.
One concern that this forward-looking question raises is whether the quality of diagnostic messages around bad calls to the operators might suffer when there are only generic overloads instead of per-type overloads. In order to feel out this problem I added a test case that includes some bad operator calls both to `+=` (which is now only generic with this change) and `+` (which still has per-type overloads). Overall, I found the quality of the error messages (in terms of the candidates that get listed) isn't perfect for either, but personally I prefer the output in the generic case.
As part of adding that test, I also added some fixups to how overload resolution messages get printed, to make sure the function name is printed in more cases, and also that the candidates print more consistently. These changes affected the expected output for one other diagnostic test.
* fixup: disable bad operator test on non-Windows targets
|
|
The actual definitions that got moved into the stdlib here are pretty few:
* `clip()`
* `cross()`
* `dxx()`, `ddy()` etc.
* `degrees()`
* `distance()`
* `dot()`
* `faceforward()`
The meat of the change is infrastructure changes required to support these new declarations
* Generic versions of the standard operators (e.g., `operator+`) were added that are generic for a type `T` that implements the matching `__Builtin`-prefixed interface. An open question is whether we can now drop the non-generic versions in favor of just having these generic operators.
* A `__BuiltinLogicalType` interface was added to capture the commonality between integers and `bool`
* `__BuiltinArithmeticType` was extended so that implementations must support initialization from an `int`
* `__BuiltinFloatingPointType` was extended to require an accessor that returns the value of pi for the given type, and the concrete floating-point types were extended to provide definitions of this value.
* It turns out that our logic for checking if two functions have the same signature (and should thus count as redeclarations/redefinitions) wasn't taking generic constraints into account at all. That was fixed with a stopgap solution that checks if the generic constraints are pairwise identical, but I didn't implement the more "correct" fix that would require canonicalizing the constraints.
* When doing overload resolution and considering potential callees, logic was added so that a non-generic candidate should always be selected over a generic one (generally the Right Thing to do), and also so that a generic candidate with fewer parameters will be selected over one with more (an approximation of the much more complicated rule we'd ideally have).
* The formatting of declarations/overloads for "ambiguous overload" errors was fleshed out a bit to include more context (the "kind" of declaration where appropriate, the return type for function declarations) and to properly space thing when outputting specialization of operator overloads that end with `<` (so that we print `func < <int>(int, int)` instead of just `func <<int,int>(int,int)`).
* The core lookup routines were heavily refactored and reorganized to try to make them bottleneck more effectively so that all paths handle all the nuances of inheritance, extensions, etc.
* Because of the refactoring to lookup logic, the semantic checking logic related to checking if a type conforms to an interface was updated to be driven based on the `Type` that is supposed to be conforming, rather than a `DeclRef` to the type's declaration. This allows it to use the type-based lookup entry point and eliminates one special-case entry point for lookup.
In addition to the various core changes, this change also refactors some of the existing stdlib code to favor writing more things in actual Slang syntax, and less in C++ code that uses `StringBuilder` to construct the Slang syntax. There is a lot more that could be done along those lines, but even pushing this far is showing that the current approach that `slang-generate` takes for how to separate meta-level C++ and Slang code isn't really ideal, so a revamp of the generator code is probably needed before I continue pushing.
One surprising casualty of the refactoring of lookup is that we no longer have the `lookedUpDecls` field in `LookupResult`. That field probably didn't belong there anyway, but the role it served was important. The idea of `lookedUpDecls` was to avoid looking up in the same interface more than once in cases where a type might have a "diamond" inheritance pattern. Removing that field doesn't appear to affect correctness of any of our existing tests, but by adding a specific test for "diamond" inheritance I could see that the refactoring introduced a regression and made looking up a member inherited along multiple paths ambiguous.
Rather than add back `lookedUpDecls` I went for a simpler (but arguably even hackier) solution where when ranking candidates from a `LookupResult` we check for identical `DeclRef`s and arbitrarily favor one over the other. One complication that arises here is that when comparing `DeclRef`s inherited along different paths they might have a `ThisTypeSubstitution` for the same type, but with different subtype witnesses (because different inheritance paths could lead to different transitive subtype witnesses: e.g., `A : B : D` and `A : C : D`).
|
|
* WIP: 64 literal diagnostic and truncation.
* Improve how integer truncation is handled/supported.
Added literal-int64.slang test.
Set a suffix on all literals.
Fixed problem on C++ based targets where l suffix was not the same as int() cast. So on C++ derived emitters, int() is used instead of l suffix to have same behavior across targets.
* Add literal diagnostic testing.
* Allow lexer to lex - in front of literals.
* Fix lexing and converting int literal with -.
* Too large small values of floats become inf.
Handling writing inf types out on different targets.
Add function to deterimine if a float literals kind.
* Roll back the support of lexer lexing negative literals.
* Fixed tests broken because of diagnostics numbers.
Improved _isFinite
* Fix compilation on linux.
* Fix problem with abs on linux - use Math::Abs.
* Fix typo.
* * Improve warnings for float literals zeroed
* Improved 64 bit type documentation
* Handle half
* Improved comments
* Fixed tests broken
* Use capital letters for suffixes.
* Make default behavior on outputting a int literal that is an 'int32_t' is cast (not suffix) to avoid platform inconsistencies.
Improve documentation for 64 bit types.
Make tests cover material in docs.
* Fixed tests.
* Rename FloatKind::Normal -> Finite
* Fix half zero check.
|
|
* Improve checks and diagnostics around redeclarations
This change turns checking for redeclarations into a dedicated phase of semantic checking, and ensures that it applies to the main categories of declarations: functions, types, and variables.
Note that "variables" here includes function parameters and `struct` fields in addition to the more obvious global and local variables.
Some of the logic for checking redeclarations already existed for functions, and was refactored to deal with other cases of declarations. The checking for functions still needs to be special-cased because functions are much more flexible about the kinds of redeclarations that are allowed.
In addition to improving the diagnosis of redeclaration itself, this change also changes the error message that is produced when referencing a symbol that is ambiguous due to begin redeclared.
This is a small quality-of-life fix, and has the benefit of being much easier to implement than robust tracking of what variables have had redeclaration errors issued so that we can skip emitting an ambiguity error at the use site.
A new test case was added to cover the redeclaration cases for variables (but not types or functions), and the test for function parameters was updated to account for the new more universal diagnostic message (since function parameters used to have special-case redeclaration checking).
* fixup: missing file
|
|
* Support conversion from int/uint to enum types
The basic feature here is tiny, and is summarized in the code added to the stdlib:
```
extension __EnumType
{
__init(int val);
__init(uint val);
}
```
The front-end already makes all `enum` types implicitly conform to `__EnumType` behind the scenes, and this `extension` makes it so that all such types inherit some initializers (`__init` declarations, aka. "constructors") that take `int` and `uint`.
(Note: right now all `__init` declarations in Slang are assumed to be implemented as intrinsics using `kIROp_Construct`. This obviously needs to change some day, especially so that we can support user-defined initializers.)
Actually making this *work* required a bit of fleshing out pieces of the compiler that had previously been a bit ad hoc to be a bit more "correct." Most of the rest of this description is focused on those details, since the main feature is not itself very exciting.
When overload resolution sees an attempt to "call" a type (e.g., `MyType(3.0)`) it needs to add appropriate overload candidates for the initializers in that type, which may take different numbers and types of parameters. The existing code for handling this case was using an ad hoc approach to try to enumerate the initializer declarations to consider, which might be found via inheritance, `extension` declarations, etc.
In practice, the ad hoc logic for looking up initializers was just doing a subset of the work that already goes into doing member lookup. Changing the code so that it effectively does lookup for `MyType.__init` allows us to look up initializers in a way that is consistent with any other case of member lookup. Generalizing this lookup step brings us one step closer to being able to go from an `enum` type `E` to an initializer defined on an `extension` of an `interface` that `E` conforms to.
One casualty of using the ordinary lookup logic for initializers is that we used to pass the type being constructed down into the logic that enumerated the initializers, which made it easier to short-circuit the part of overload resolution that usually asks "what type does this candidate return."
It might seem "obvious" that an initializer/constructor on type `Foo` should return a value of type `Foo`, but that isn't necessarily true.
Consider the `__BuiltinFloatingPointType` interface, which requires all the built-in floating-point types (`float`, `double`, `half`) to have an initializer that can take a `float`.
If we call that interface in a generic context for `T : __BuiltinFloatingPointType`, then we want to treat that initializer as returning `T` and not `__BuiltinFloatingPointType`.
Without the ad hoc logic in initializer overload resolution, this is the exact problem that surfaced for the stdlib definition of `clamp`.
The solution to the "what type does an initializer return" problem was to introduce a notion of a `ThisType`, which refers to the type of `this` in the body of an interface.
More generally, we will eventually want to have the keyword `This` be the type-level equivalent of `this`, and be usable inside any type.
The `calcThisType` function introduced here computes a reasonable `Type` to represent the value of `This` within a given declaration.
Inside of concrete type it refers to the type itself, while in an `interface` it will always be a `ThisType`.
The existing `ThisTypeSubstitution`s, previously only applied to associated types, now apply to `ThisType`s as well, in the same situations.
The next roadblock for making the simple declarations for `__EnumType` work was that the lookup logic was only doing lookup through inheritance relationships when the type being looked up in was an `interface`.
The logic in play was reasonable: if you are doing lookup in a type `T` that inherits from `IFoo`, then why bother looking for `IFoo::bar` when there must be a `T::bar` if `T` actually implements the interface?
The catch in this case is that `IFoo::bar` might not be a requirement of `IFoo`, but rather a concrete method added via an `extension`, in which case `T` need not have its own concrete `bar`.
The simple/obvious fix here was to make the lookup logic always include inherited members, even when looking up through a concrete type.
Of course, if we allow lookup to see `IFoo::bar` when looking up on `T`, then we have the problem that both `T::bar` and `IFoo::bar` show up in the lookup results, and potentially lead to an "ambiguous overload" error.
This problem arises for any interface rquirement (so both methods and associated types right now).
In order to get around it, I added a somewhat grungy check for comparing overload candidates (during overload resolution) or `LookupResultItem`s (during resolution of simple overloaded identifiers) that considers a member of a concrete type as automatically "better" than a member of an interface.
The Right Way to solve this problem in the long run requires some more subtlety, but for now this check should Just Work.
One final wrinkle is that due to our IR lowering pass being a bit overzealous, we currently end up trying to emit IR for those new `__init` declarations, which ends up causing us to try and emit IR for a `ThisType`.
That is a case that will require some subtlty to handle correctly down the line, for for now we do the expedient thing and emit the `ThisType` for `IFoo` as `IFoo` itself, which is not especially correct, but doesn't matter since the concrete initializer won't ever be called.
* testing: add more debug output to Unix process launch function
* testing: increase timeout when running command-line tests
|
|
* Remove legacy feature for merging global shader parameters
There is a fair amount of special-case code in the Slang compiler today to deal with the scenario where a programmer declares the "same" shader parameter across two different translation units:
```hlsl
// a.hlsl
Texture2D a;
cbuffer C { float4 c; }
```
```hlsl
// b.hlsl
cbuffer C { float4 c; }
Texture2D b;
```
An important note here is that the declaration of `C` may be in a header file that both `a.hlsl` and `b.hlsl` `#include`, because from the standpoint of the parser and later stages of the compiler, there is no difference between `C` being in an included file vs. it being copy-pasted across both `a.hlsl` and `b.hlsl`.
When a user invokes `slangc a.hlsl b.hlsl` (or the equivalent via the API), then they may decide that it is "obvious" that the shader parameter `C` is the "same" in both `a.hlsl` and `b.hlsl`.
Knowing that the parameter is the "same" may lead them to make certain assumptions:
* They may assume that generated code for entry points in `a.hlsl` and `b.hlsl` will both agree on the exact `register`/`binding` occupied by `C`.
* They may assume that reflection information for their program will only reflect `C` once, and it will reflect it in a way that is applicable to entry points in both `a.hlsl` and `b.hlsl`
* They may assume that the compiler can and should handle this use case even when `C` contains fields with `struct` types that are declared in both `a.hlsl` and `b.hlsl` that have the "same" definition.
* They may assume that in cases where `C` is declared inconsistently between `a.hlsl` and `b.hlsl` the compiler can and will diagnose an error.
Making these assumptions work in practice required a lot of special-case code:
* When composing/linking programs was `ComponentType`s we had to include a special case `LegacyProgram` type that could provide these "do what I mean" semantics, since they are *not* what one would want in the general case for a `CompositeComponentType`.
* During enumeration of global shader parameter in a `LegacyProgram`, we had to detect parameters from distinct modules (translation units) with the same name, and then enforce that they must have the "same" type (via an ad hoc recursive structural type match). No other semantic checking logic needs or uses that kind of structural check.
* During parameter binding generation, we need to handle the case where a single global shader parameter might have multiple declarations, and make sure to collect explicit bindings from all of them (checking for inconsistency) and also to apply generated bindings to all of them.
* The `mapVarToLayout` member in `StructTypeLayout` is a concession to the fact that we might have multiple `VarDecl`s for each field of the struct that represents the global scope, we might need to look up a field and its layout using any of those declarations (much of the need for this field had gone away now that IR passes are largely using IR-based layout).
All of these different special cases added more complex code in many places in the compiler, all to support a scenario that isn't especially common.
Most users won't be affected by the original issue, because they will do one of several things that rule it out:
* Anybody using `slangc` like a stand-in for `fxc` or `dxc` and compiling one translation unit at a time will not suffer from any problems. If/when such users want consistent bindings across translation units, they already use either explicit binding or rely on consistent ordering and implicit binding.
* Anybody who puts all the entry points that get combined into a pass/pipeline in a single file will not have problems. They will automatically get consistent bindings because of Slang's guarantees, and there can't be duplicated declarations when there is only one translation unit.
* Anybody using `import` to factor out common declarations while compiling multiple translation units at once will not be affected. Parameters declared in an `import`ed module are the "same" in a much deeper way that it is trivial for Slang to support.
Only users of the Falcor framework are likely to be affected by this, and they have two easy migration paths: either put related entry points into the same file, or factor common parameters into an `import`ed module.
(It is also worth noting that for command-line `slangc`, it is possible to have a single module with multiple `.slang` files in it, which can all see global declarations like parameters across all the files. Anybody who buys into doing things the Slang Way should have no problem avoiding duplicated declarations)
With the rationale out of the way, the actual change mostly just amounts to deleting lots of code that is no longer needed. An astute reviewer might notice several `assert`-fail conditions where complex Slang features were never actually made to work correctly with this legacy behavior.
A small number of test cases broke with the code changes, but these were tests that specifically exercised the behavior being removed. In the case of the tests around binding/reflection generating, I rewrote the tests to use one of the idomatic workarounds (putting the shared parameters into an `import`ed module), but doing so required me to add support for `#include` when doing pass-through compilation with `fxc`. That logic added a bit more cruft than I had originally hoped to this commit, but having `#include` support when doing pass-through compilation is probably a net win.
* fixup: 64-bit warning
|
|
Currently if the user gives two global shader parameters conflicting bindings, they get a warning diagnostic:
```hlsl
Texture2D a : register(t0);
Texture2D b : register(t0); // WARNING: overlapping bindings
```
This change adds a way to locally disable that warning using an attribute:
```hlsl
[allow("overlapping-bindings")] Texture2D a : register(t0);
[allow("overlapping-bindings")] Texture2D b : register(t0); // OK
```
Note that as a policy decision, the implementation requires `[allow("overlapping-bindings")]` on both declarations in order to disable the warning, under the assumption that the behavior should be strictly opt-in, and not silently affect a programmer who adds a new shader parameter with no knowledge or expectation of possible overlap.
The `[allow(...)]` attribute is intended to be a fairly generally mechanism for disabling optional diagnostics within certain scopes (e.g., for the body of a function definition), but as implemented in this change it is quite restrictive:
* Only the single name `"overlapping-bindings"` will be recognized, and this name cannot be used with, e.g., a `-W` flag on the command line to enable/disable the same diagnostic, or turn it into an error. Adding more cases would be easy enough, but wiring it up to command-line flags could be trickier.
* Only the code that checks for parameter binding overlap is currently checking for `[allow(...)]` attributes, so it is not "wired up" to enable/disable any others. Doing this systematically would ideally involve something in `diagnose()`, but there could be complications to a systematic approach (finding the AST node(s) to use when searching for `[allow(...)]`.
On gotcha here is that versions of Slang without this feature will error out on the `[allow(...)]` attribute since they don't understand it, and if we add future diagnostics that it covers then old compiler versions will (as written) error out on a diagnostic they haven't heard of rather than just assume the `[allow(...)]` attribute doesn't apply to them. These kinds of issues can and should be addressed in future changes.
|
|
* First pass extract the test information by 'running tests'.
* * Checking renderer availablilty
* Using TestInfo to determine which tests are run and synthesized
* Display if test is synthesized and what render api it's targetting
* * Improved comments
* Removed some dead code
* Display ignored tests.
* TestInfo -> TestRequirements
* * Added DIAGNOSTIC_TEST type - test always runs (ie has no requirements).
* Made diagnostic tests use DIAGNOSTIC_TEST
* TestInfo -> TestRequirements
* TestDetails holds TestRequirements and TestOptions
* Fix debug typo.
|
|
* Overhaul the core routines for implicit conversion
The main user-visible change is that we have fixed the bug where conversions that should only be allowed explicitly were being allowed implicitly. This might be seen as a regression by users, so we'll have to be careful when rolling out the fix.
The core of that fix involves checking whether an `init` declaration that will be invoked as an implicit conversion actually supports implicit conversions.
The main visible change in the code is some renamings to try and help make the core type-coercion routines better fit our naming conventions.
The main cleanup is to enforce the invariant that any of the implicit-conversion core routines will always emit a diagnostic (or have a subroutine it calls do so) when conversion fails and the `outToExpr` parameter is non-null. This is a small change, but should improve the user experience if an implicit conversion fails in the context of a single element of an initializer list (the error should point at the line in question, and not at the whole list).
The big thing that is impacted by removing the ability to use explicit conversions implicitly is conversion of `enum` types to integers. This was intended to be explicit (a la `enum class` in C++), but the bug made it so that implicit conversion was allowed.
Closing up that gap meant that some of the checking around user-defined attributes got wonky, because we attempt to check that the attribute argument is an integer constant expression, but an `enum` case can't possible be an integer constant - it is a value of the `enum` type. I added code to work around that issue by having a parallel path for checking compile-time-constant expressions of `enum` type, but it is clear that a more general solution is needed eventually.
* fixup: test case needs explicit cast
|
|
* Add diagnostic for vk::binding failure.
* Add test for vk::binding failure.
* Add the expected output for glsl-layout-define.hlsl
* * Copy over initialize expr if available when validating unchecked
* Fix unloop - because now it always has one parameter (when before it could have none)
* Split vk::binding and layout tests with invalid parameters
* Removed the diagnostic for 2 ints expected
* Added vk::binding that doesn't specify set in vk-bindings.slang
* * Fix typo
* Improve comments.
|
|
* * Fix some comment typos
* Fix typo in diagnostic message
* Fix typo in expected output of undefined-in-preprocessor-conditional
|
|
* Made diagnostic message more compliant + fixed test output
* Typo fixes
|
|
* * Replaced ShaderRecordNVLayoutModifier with ShaderRecordAttribute
* Allowed attributed [[vk::shader_record] and [[shader_record]]
* Checking there is at most 1 ShaderRecord active
* Small typo fixes
* Slightly improve diagnostic.
Replace expected file.
|
|
|
|
|
|
* * Added COMMAND_LINE_SIMPLE test type
* Made how spawning works controllable by paramter/type SpawnType
* Made break-outside-loop and global-uniform run command line slangc
* calcRelativePath -> calcCombinedPath
* Add 64 bit version of GetHash.
* Add support for Hash based mode for CacheFileSystem.
|
|
A global uniform parameter in HLSL might canonically be defined like this:
```hlsl
uniform float gSomeParameter;
```
The fxc and dxc compilers automatically collect all such parameters into a synthesized constant buffer, along the lines of:
```hlsl
cbuffer $Globals
{
float gSomeParameter;
}
```
Slang currently supports parsing and semantic checking of declarations like the above, and computes shader parameter layout/binding information that is appropriate for a constant buffer like `$Globals` above, but it does not include the support to emit HLSL or GLSL code that matches that layout, so that use of global uniforms in Slang is silently unsupported.
Making this problem worse, the HLSL language is quite lax, and will parse the following as shader parameters as well:
```hlsl
int gCounter = 0;
const float kScaleFactor = 2.0f;
```
Each of those declarations introduces a global shader parameter, and then provides a default value for it via the initializer. These declarations do *not* introduce an ordinary global variable or constant as might be expected.
(For anybody who wants to know, `static` is required to introduce a "real" global variable (although it will be a *thread-local* global in practice), while `static const` is required to introduce a global constant)
I was not too worried about users trying to use global-scope uniforms and failing (since that has fallen out of common HLSL/GLSL practice), but the possibility that users might try to declare global variables/constants and get shader parameters by mistake creates more of a risk so that this hole is worth plugging.
The right long-term fix is of course to support the intended semantics of global-scope uniforms, but that feature needs to be prioritized against other requests.
A few of the Slang tests were unwittingly relying on this functionality, including some compute tests that seemingly got away with it based on the DXBC generated from the HLSL output by Slang just happening to match the layout they expected. These tests have all been tweaked to use explicit `cbuffer`s or `ParameterBlock`s instead.
|
|
* Don't look at VK bindings when compiling for D3D and vice versa
The compiler had been looking at all the modifiers on a declaration when piecing together binding information, whether or not those modifiers should apply on the chosen target API. This was working in practice because the "layout resource kinds" used by each API target were disjoint, for the most part.
This change ensures that we don't even look at modifiers that don't apply on the chosen target, and furthermore adds a new warning that applies if the user is compiling a shader with explicit `register` bindings for Vulkan, if there are no corresponding `[[vk::binding(...)]]` attributes (under the assumption that if they want to be explicit in one case, they probably want to be explicit in all cases).
* Allow explicit space/set bindings on parameter blocks
The syntax for the D3D case is to specify a `space` in a `register` modifier, without any other register class:
```hlsl
ParameterBlock<X> myBlock : regsiter(space999);
```
In the Vulkan case, the user must apply the `[[vk::binding(...)]]` attribute and is expected to use a `binding` of zero:
```hlsl
[[vk::binding(0,999)]]
ParameterBlock<X> myBlock;
```
This change includes a reflection test for the new capability (where we also confirm that it produces the expected output when compared with fxc), and a test for the diagnostic messages when the user messes up bindings for Vulkan.
The implementation itself is fairly straightforward, since the compiler already treats registe spaces/sets as a resource that parameters can consume directly.
Note: the test case for explicit parameter block space/set bindings includes some commented out code that lead to a compiler crash. I would like to fix the underlying issue, but it seemed sensible to keep the bug fix out of a change like this that is adding functionality.
|
|
|
|
* Rework command-line options handling for entry points and targets
Overview:
* The biggest functionality change is that the implicit ordering constraints when multiple `-entry` options are reversed: any `-stage` option affects the `-entry` to its *left* instead of to its *right* as it used to. This is technically a breaking change, but I expect most users aren't using this feature.
* The options parsing tries to handle profile versions and stages as distinct data (rather than using the combined `Profile` type all over), and treats a `-profile` option that specifies both a profile version and a stage (e.g., `-profile ps_5_0`) as if it were sugar for both a `-profile` and a `-stage` (e.g., `-profile sm_5_0 -stage fragment`).
* We now technically handle multiple `-target` options in one invocation of `-slangc`, but do not advertise that fact in the documentation because it might be confusing for users. Similar to the relationship between `-stage` and `-entry`, any `-profile` option affects the most recent `-target` option unless there is only one `-target`.
* The logic for associating `-o` options with corresponding entry points and targets has been beefed up. The rule is that a `-o` option for a compiled kernel binds to the entry point to its left, unless there is only one entry point (just like for `-stage`). The associated target for a `-o` option is found via a search, however, because otherwise it would be impossible to specify `-o` options for both SPIR-V and DXIL in one pass.
* The handling of output paths for entry points in the internal compiler structures was changed, because previously it could only handle one output path per entry point (even when there are multiple targets). The new logic builds up a per-target mapping from an entry point to its desired output path (if any).
Details:
* Support for formatting profile versions, stages, and compile targets (formats) was added to diagnostic printing, so that we can make better error messages. This is fairly ad hoc, and it would be nice to have all of the string<->enum stuff be more data-driven throughout the codebase.
* Test cases were added for (almost) all of the error conditions in the current options validation. The main one that is missing is around specifying an `-entry` option before any source file when compiling multiple files. This is because the test runner is putting the source file name first on the command line automatically, so we can't reproduce that case.
* Several reflection-related tests now reflect entry points where they didn't before, because the logic for detecting when to infer a default `main` entry point have been made more loose
* On the dxc path, beefed up the handling of mapping from Slang `Profile`s to the coresponding string to use when invoking dxc.
* A bunch of tests cases were in violation of the newly imposed rules, so those needed to be cleaned up.
* There were also a bunch of test cases that had accidentally gotten "disabled" at some point because there were comparing output from `slangc` both with and without a `-pass-through` option, but that meant that any errors in command-line parsing produced the *same* error output in both the Slang and pass-through cases. This change updates `slang-test` to always expect a successful run for these tests, and then manually updates or disables the various test cases that are affected.
* When merging the updated test for matrix layout mode, I found that the new command-line logic was failing to propagate a matrix layout mode passed to `render-test` into the compiler. This was because the `-matrix-layout*` options were implemented as per-target, but the target was being set by API while the option came in via command line (passed through the API). It seems like we want matrix layout mode to be a global option anyway (rather than per-target), so I made that change here.
* Add missing expected output files
* A 64-bit fix
* Remove commented-out code noted in review
|
|
By default, when writing a "method" (aka "member function") in Slang, the `this` parameter is implicitly an `in` parameter. So this:
```hlsl
struct Foo
{
int state;
int getState() { return state; }
void setState(int s) { state = s; }
};
```
is desugared into something like this:
```hlsl
struct Foo { int state };
int Foo_getState(Foo this) { return this.state; }
// BAD:
void Foo_setState(Foo this, int s) { this.state = s; }
```
That "setter" doesn't really do what was intended. It modifies a local copy of type `Foo`, because `in` parameters in HLSL represent by-value copy-in semantics, and are mutable in the body the function. Slang was updated to give a static error on the original code to catch this kind of mistake (so that `this` parameters are unlike ordinary function parameters, and no longer mutable).
Of course, sometimes users *want* a mutable `this` parameter. Rather than make a mutable `this` the default (there are arguments both for and against this), this change adds a new attribute `[mutating]` that can be put on a method (member function) to indicate that its `this` parameter should be an `in out` parameter:
```hlsl
[mutating] void setState(int s) { state = s; }
```
The above will translate to, more or less:
```hlsl
void Foo_setState(inout Foo this, int s) { this.state = s; }
```
One added detail is that `[mutating]` can also be used on interface requirements, with the same semantics. A `[mutating]` requirement can be satisfied with a `[mutating]` or non-`[mutating]` method, while a non-`[mutating]` requirement can't be satisfied with a `[mutating]` method (the call sites would not expect mutation to happen).
The design of `[mutating]` here is heavily influenced by the equivalent `mutating` keyword in Swift.
Notes on the implementation:
* Adding the new attribute was straightforward using the existing support, but I had to change around where attributes get checked in the overall sequencing of static checks, because attributes were being checked *after* function bodies, but with this change I need to look at semantically-checked attributes to determine the mutability of `this`
* The check to restrict it so that `[mutating]` methods cannot satisfy non-`[mutating]` requirements was easy to add, but it points out the fact that there is a huge TODO comment where the actual checking of method *signatures* is supposed to happen. That is a bug waiting to bite users and needs to be fixed!
* While we had special-case logic to detect attempts to modify state accessed through an immutable `this` (e.g., `this.state = s`), that logic didn't trigger when the mutation happened through a function/operator call (e.g., `this.state += s`), so this change factors out the validation logic for that case and calls through to it from both the assignment and `out` argument cases.
* The error message for the special-case check was updated to note that the user could apply `[mutating]` to their function declaration to get rid of the error.
* The semantic checking logic for an explicit `this` expression was already walking up through the scopes (created during parsing) and looking for a scope that represents an outer type declaration that `this` might be referring to. We simply extend it to note when it passes through the scope for a function or similar declaration (`FunctionDeclBase`) and check for the `[mutating]` attribute. If the attribute is seen, it returns a mutable `this` expression, and otherwise leaves it immutable.
* The IR lowering logic then needed to be updated so that when adding an IR-level parameter to represent `this`, it gives it the appropriate "direction" based on the attributes of the function declaration being lowered. The rest of the IR logic works as-is, because it will treat `this` just like an other parameter (whether it is `in` or `inout`).
* This biggest chunk of work was the "implicit `this`" case, because ordinary name lookup may resolve an expression like `state` into `this.state`, so that the `this` expression comes out of "thin air." To handle this case, I extended the structure of the "breadcrumbs" that come along with a lookup result (the breadcrumbs are used for any case where a single identifier like `state` needs to be embellished to a more complex expression as a result of lookup), so that it can identify whether a `Breadcrumb::Kind::This` node comes from a `[mutating]` context or not. Similar to the logic for an explicit `this`, we handle this by noting when we pass through a `FunctionDeclBase` when moving up through scopes, and look for the `[mutating]` attribute on it. The rest of the work was just plumbing the additional state through.
|
|
This can mask an error when the user either typos a macro name when writing a conditional, or (as was the case for the user who pointed out this issue) they mistakenly assume that a `#define` in an `import`ed file has been made visible to them.
This change just adds the warning in the obvious place, with a test code to ensure it triggers.
|
|
Slang `enum` declarations will always be scoped, e.g.:
```hlsl
enum Color
{
Red,
Green = 2,
Blue,
}
Color c = Color.Red; // Not just `Red`
```
A user can write `enum class` as a placebo for now (to ease sharing of headers with C++).
Slang does not currently support the `::` operator for static member lookup, so it must be `Color.Green` and not `Color::Green`. Support for `::` as an alternate syntax could be added later if there is strong user demand.
An `enum` type can have a declared "tag type" using syntax like C++ `enum class`:
```hlsl
enum MyThings : uint
{
First = 0,
// ...
}
```
The `enum` cases will store their values using that type. An `enum` that doesn't declare a tag type will use the type `int` by default.
Enum cases are assigned values just like in C/C++: cases can have explicit values, but otherwise default to one more than the previous case, or zero for the first case.
All `enum` types will automatically conform to a standard-library `interface` called `__EnumType`, which is used so that basic operators like equality testing can be defined generically for all `enum` types.
This change only adds one operator at first (the `==` comparison), but other should be added later.
An `enum` case needs to be explicitly converted to an integer where needed (e.g., `int(Color.Red)`).
This is implemented by having the main integer types (`int` and `uint`) support built-in initializers that can work for *any* `enum` type (or rather, anything conforming to `__EnumType`).
Eventually these will be restricted so that an `enum` type can only be converted to its associated tag type.
IR code generation completely eliminates `enum` types and their cases.
The `enum` type will be replaced with its tag type, and the cases will be replaced with the tag values.
Currently this could leave some mess in the IR where cast operations are applied between values that actually have the same type.
|
|
This change adds support for specifying explicit register spaces, like:
```hlsl
// Bind to texture register #2 in space #1
Texture2D t : register(t2, space1);
```
I added a test case to confirm that the register space is properly propagated through the Slang reflection API.
This change also adds proper error messages for some error/unsupported cases that weren't being diagnosed:
* Specifying a completely bogus register "class" (e.g., `register(bad99)`)
* Failing to specify a register index (`register(u)`)
* Specifying a component mask (`register(t0.x)`)
* Using `packoffset` bindings
I added test cases to cover all of these, as well as the new errors around support for register `space` bindings.
In order to get the existing tests to pass, I had to remove explicit `packoffset` bindings from some DXSDK test shaders.
None of these `packoffset` bindings were semantically significant (they matched what the compiler would do anyway, for both Slang and the standard HLSL compiler). Removing them is required for Slang now that we give an explicit error about our lack of `packoffset` support.
In a future change we might add logic to either detect semantically insignificant `packoffset`s, or to just go ahead and support them properly (as a general feature on `struct` types).
|
|
Fixes #527
There were a few problem cases for the IR emit logic. The most obvious, which came up in #527 is that a function body with multiple `return` statements would generate invalid code:
```hlsl
int foo()
{
return 1;
int x = 2;
return x;
}
```
In that case the IR for `foo` would have a single block that has two `return` instructions, which is invalid.
Another case that seems to be arising more often, but that had less obvious consequences was when one arm of an `if` statement ends in a `return`:
```hlsl
if(a)
{
return b;
}
else
{
int c = 0;
}
int d = 0;
```
In that case, the `return` instruction for `return b` would be followed by a branch to the end of the `if` (the `int d = 0;` line), because that would be the normal control flow without the early `return`.
The fix implemented here is to have the IR lowering logic be a bit more careful on two fronts:
1. When emitting a branch, check if the block we are emitting into has already been terminated, and if so just don't emit the branch (since we are logically at an unreachable point in the CFG.
2. Whenever we are about to emit code for a (non-empty) statement, ensure that the current block being build is unterminated. If the current block is terminated, then start a new one.
Case (2) will only matter when there is unreachable code (e.g., in the function `foo()`, the declaration of `x` and the second `return` can never be reached), so I added a warning in that case, and included a test case that triggers the new warning (with a function like `foo()` above).
|
|
* Diagnose attempts to write to fields in methods
Work on #529
This helps to avoid the case where a Slang user writes a struct with helpful `setter` methods, and finds that it doesn't work as expected because the `this` parameter is currently handled like an `in` parameter (passed by value, but mutable in the callee).
Fixing this issue actually involved making a more broad fix to how l-value-ness is propagated. The existing checking logic was assuming that l-value-ness is just a property of a particular member declaration (e.g., a field is either mutable or not), and didn't take into account whether the "base expression" was mutable. This change fixes that oversight, which might lead to additional errors being issued if we aren't correctly making things mutable when we should.
A `ThisExpr` was already immutable by default, so that part didn't actually need to change. Just propagating its immutability through was enough.
As an additional assistance to users, I have added an extra diagnostic that triggers when a "destination of assignment is not an l-value" error occurs and the left-hand-side expression seems to be based on `this` (whether implicitly or explicitly). This will ideally help users to understand that the "setter" idiom is not yet supported.
* Fixed setRadius typo
|
|
Work on #499
Two big fixes here:
* The logic for checking constraints on `out` arguments wasn't actually triggering because it relied on function parameters being given an `OutType` if they are marked `out`, but the code wasn't actually doing that. Fixing the computation of types for functions resolved that issue.
* Next, I added a specific diagnostic to follow up the "expected an l-value" error to let the user know that their argument was implicitly converted, and that is why it doesn't count as an l-value in Slang's rules.
I've added a test case to ensure that we retain this diagnostic until we can do a true fix for the issue.
The right long-term fix is to have an AST representation of all the implicit casts involved (e.g., in both directions for an `inout` parameter), and then have the IR generate explicit code for the conversions in each direction (the `LoweredVal` representation can handle this sort of thing).
|
|
* Stop compilation when a important module contains errors.
* Fixup test cases
|
|
* Fix bug when subscripting a type that must be split (#396)
The logic was creating a `PairPseudoExpr` as part of a subscript (`operator[]`) operation, but neglecting to fill in its `pairInfo` field, which led to a null-pointer crash further along.
* Allow writes to UAV textures (#416)
Work on #415
This issue is already fixed in the `v0.10.*` line, but I'm back-porting the fix to `v0.9.*`.
The issue here was that the stdlib declarations for texture types were only including the `get` accessor for subscript operations, even if the texture was write-able.
I've also included the fixes for other subscript accessors in the stdlib (notably that `OutputPatch<T>` is readable, but not writable, despite what the name seems to imply).
* Fix infinite loop in semantic parsing (#424)
The code for parsing semantics was looking for a fixed set of tokens to terminate a semantic list, rather than assuming that whenever you don't see a `:` ahead, you probably are done with semantics. This meant that you could get into an infinite loop just with simple mistakes like leaving out a `;`.
This change fixes the parser to note infinite loop in this case, and adds a test case to verify the fix.
|
|
* Initial work on validating "constexpr"-ness in IR
The underlying issue here is that certain operations in the target shading languages constrain their operands to be compile-time constants. A notable example is the optional texel offset parameter to the `Texture2D.Sample` operation.
When calling these operations in GLSL, the user is required to pass a "constant expression," and any variables in that expression must therefore be marked with the `const` qualifier (and themselves be initialized with constant expressions). Any GLSL output we generate must of course respect these rules.
When calling these operations in HLSL, the user is not so constrained. Instead, they can pass an arbitrary expression, which may involve ordinary variables with no particular markup, and then the compiler is responsible for determining if the actual value after simplification works out to be a constant. In some cases, the requirement that a value be constant might actually trigger things like loop unrolling. Also, it is okay to use a function parameter to determine such a constant expression, as long as the argument turns out to be a constant at all call sites.
The way we have decided to tackle these challenges in Slang is that we we propagate a notion of `constexpr`-ness through the IR. This is currently being tackled in `ir-constexpr.cpp` with a combination of forward and backward iterative dataflow:
* When the operands to an instruction are all `constexpr`, and the opcode is one we believe can be constant-folded, then we infer that the instruction *can* be evaluated as `constexpr`
* When instruction is required to be `constexpr`, then we infer that all of its operands are also required to be `constexpr`.
If this process ever infers that a function parameter is required to be `constexpr`, then we might have to continue propagation at all the call sites to that function.
If after all the propagation is done, there are any cases where an instruction is *required* to be `constexpr`, but it *can't* be `constexpr` (we weren't able to infer `constexpr`-ness for its operands), then we issue an error.
This implementation encodes the idea of `constexpr`-ness in the IR as part of the type system, using a simplified notion of rates. This change adds a `RateQualifiedType` that can represent `@R T`, and then introduces a `ConstExprRate` that can be used for `R`. Many accessors for the type information on IR nodes were updated to distinguish when one wants the "full" type of an IR value (which might include rate information) vs. just the "data" type.
A `constexpr` qualifier was added in the front-end, and is being used to decorate the texel offset parameter for `Texture2D.Sample`. Lowering from AST to IR looks for this qalifier and infers when a function parameter must be typed as `@ConstExpr T` instead of just `T`.
There are lots of limitations and gotchas in the implementation so far:
* The `@ConstExpr` rate is the only one added in this change, but it seems clear that the conceptual `ThreadGroup` rate that was added to represent `groupshared` should probably get folded into the representation.
* I'm not 100% pleased with how many places in the IR I have to special-case for rate-qualified types. At the same type, pulling out rate as a distinct field on `IRValue` would probably require that we pay attention to rate everywhere.
* I've added a test case to show that we can issue errors when users fail to provide a constant expression for the texel offset, but the actual error message isn't great because it doesn't indicate *why* a constant expression was required. Realistically the "initial IR" should contain a few more decorations we can use to relate error conditions back to the original code (even if this is in a side-band structure).
* I've added a test case that is supposed to show that we can back-propagate `constexpr`-ness to local variables, and I've manually confirmed that it works for Vulkan/SPIR-V output, but the level of Vulkan support in `render_test` today means I can't enable the test for check-in.
* While I'm attempting to propagate `@ConstExpr` information from callees to callers, I haven't implemented any logic to specialize callee functions based on values at call sites.
* In a similar vein, there is no handling of control-flow dependence in the current code. If we infer that a phi (block parameter) needs to be `@ConstExpr`, then it isn't actually enough to require that the inputs to the phi (arguments from predecessor blocks) are all `@ConstExpr` because we also need any control-flow decisions that pick which incoming edge we take to be `@ConstExpr` as well.
* As a practical matter, implicit propagation of `@ConstExpr` from a function body to a function parameter should only be allowed for functions that are "local" to a module. Any function that might be accessed from outside of a module should really have had its `@ConstExpr` parameter marked manually, and our pass should validate that they follow their own rules. Right now we have no kind of visibility (`public` vs `private`) system, so I'm kind of ignoring this issue.
While that is a lot of gaps, this is also just enough code to get the Falcor MultiPassPostProcess example working, so I'm inclined to get it checked in.
* Fixup: missing expected output for test
* Fixup: disable test that relies on [unroll] for now
|
|
* Fix handling of errors in imported modules
- If a semantic error is detected in an imported module, then don't try to generate IR code for it
- Also, if a module (transitively) imports itself, then report that as an error
- The way I'm checking for this is a bit hacky (I'm adding the module to the map of loaded modules, but in an "unfinished" state, and then using that unfinished state to detect the import of a module already being imported).
This isn't a 100% complete solution for any of the related problems, but it improves the user experience for the common case.
* Remove #import test.
The feature is slated to be removed, so it isn't worth fixing up this test case.
|
|
The basic problem here arises when a local variable is used either before its own declaration:
```hlsl
int a = b;
...
int b = 0;
```
or when a local variable is used *in* its own decalration:
```hlsl
int b = b;
```
In each case, Slang considers the scope of the `{}`-enclosed function body (or nested statement) as a whole, and so the lookup can "see" the declaration even if it is later in the same function.
This behavior isn't really correct for HLSL semantics, so the right long-term fix is to change our scoping rules, but for now users really just want the compiler to not crash on code like this, and give an error message that points at the issue.
This change makes both of the above examples print an error message saying that variable `b` was used before its declaration, which is accurate to the way that Slang is interpreting those code examples.
This is currently treated as a fatal error, so that compilation aborts right away, to avoid all of the downstream crashes that these cases were causing.
|
|
|
|
Closes #38
- Change overlapping bindings case from error to warning (it is *technically* allowed in HLSL/GLSL)
- Make diagnostic messages for these cases include a note to point at the "other" declaration in each case, so that user can more easily isolate the problem
- Unrelated fix: make sure `slangc` sets up its diagnostic callback *before* parsing command-line options so that error messages output during options parsing will be visible
- Unrelated fix: make sure that formatting for diagnostic messages doesn't print diagnostic ID for notes (all have IDs < 0).
- Note: eventually I'd like to not print diagnostic IDs at all (I think they are cluttering up our output), but doing that requires touching all the test cases...
|
|
- The big change here is that all the definitions for syntax-node classes have been macro-ized, to that we can do light metaprogramming over them
- The use of macros for this has big down-sides, but I'm not quite ready to do anything more heavy-weight right now
- The macro-ized definitions can be included multiple times, to generate different declarations/code as needed
- The first example of using this meta-programming facility is a new visitor system
- The actual visitor base classes and the dispatch logic are all generated from the meta-files
- There was only one visitor left in the code: the semantics checker, so that was ported to the new system.
- All current test cases pass, so *of course* that means all is well.
|
|
This includes a bunch of related changes:
- `slang-test`
- Add a notion of an "output mode" that specifies whether we output to console (the default), or invoke the apprpriate AppVeyor command to update test status
- Add a notion of test categories, so that tests can be tagged with categories, and then we can invoke only those tets in a given category, or choose to *exclude* tests with specific categories
- Allow the `OSProcessSpawner` to look up an executable by "path" (meaning a full path is expected) or by "name" (meaning it should be allowed to look in the current directory, `PATH` environment variable, etc.). This was important to make sure that I can run `appveyor` without having to know its absolute path.
- AppVeyor configuration
- Change badge to reflect new build account for organization (rather than a single-user account)
- Remove attempt to set AppVeyor build version in a clever way, since it breaks links from GitHub to AppVeyor
- Change order or configurations in the build matrix to front-load the Release build (which has the main tests)
- Turn on `fast_finish` flag so we don't have to wait as long for failed builds
- Turn on `parallel` builds
- Set `verbosity: minimal` to avoid getting build spew about Xamarin stuff I'm not using
- Add custom `test_script` to invoke `test.bat`
- Sets the test category based on teh build configuration, so we don't run the full test suite on every input.
- `test.bat`
- Allow for `-platform` and `-configuration` arguments
- Rewrute a platform of `Win32` over to `x86` to match how the output directories are named
- Futz around with how the directories are being passed along to work around annoying `.bat` file quoting behavior (I still don't get how batch files work)
- Tests
- Mark a bunch of tests as `smoke` tests
- Mark the relevant tests as `render` tests
(these get filtered out for AppVeyor builds)
|
|
Many of the existing test cases were being skipped on accident, because their file names used `.spire` and the test tool was now looking for `.slang`
|
|
|
