| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
* Add support for '=' when defining a name in test.
* Add support for double intrinsics.
* Add support for asdouble
Add findOrAddInst - used instead of findOrEmitHoistableInst, for nominal instructions.
Support cloning of string literals.
C++ working on more compute tests.
* Constant buffer support in reflection.
Fixed debugging into source for generated C++.
buffer-layout.slang works.
* Added cpu test result.
* Remove some commented out code.
Comment on next fixes.
* Improvements to reflection CPU code.
* C++ working with ByteAddressBuffer.
* Enabled more compute tests for CPU.
* Enabled more compute tests on CPU.
Added support for [] style access to a vector.
* Enabled more CPU compute tests.
* Handling of buffer-type-splitting.slang
Named buffers can be paths to resources
* Fix some warnings, remove some dead code.
* Fix problem with verification of number of operands for asuint/asint as they can have 1 or 3 operands. asdouble takes 2.
* Fix handling in MemoryArena around aligned allocations. That _allocateAlignedFromNewBlock assumed the block allocated has the aligment that was requested and so did not correct the start address.
|
|
The basic change is simple: remove support for all code generation paths other than the IR.
There is a lot of vestigial code left, but the main logic in `ast-legalize.*` is gone.
Doing this breaks a *lot* of tests, for various reasons:
- We can no longer guarantee exactly matching DXBC or SPIR-V output after things pass through out IR
- Many builtins don't have matching versions defined for GLSL output via IR (even when they had versions defined via the earlier approach that worked with the AST)
- A lot of code creates intermediate values of opaque types in the IR, which turn into opaque-type temporaries that aren't allowed (this breaks many GLSL tests, but also some HLSL)
I implemented some small fixes for issues that I could get working in the time I had, but most of the above are larger than made sense to fix in this commit.
For now I'm disabling the tests that cause problems, but we will need to make a concerted effort to get things working on this new substrate if we are going to make good on our goals.
|
|
Also support the scenario that the extension declares conformance to interface I, and a method M in I is already supported by the base implementation.
|
