| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
`[DerivativeMember(DiffType.field)]` (#2460)
* wip: remove auto-diff for member access, add diff through property accessors.
* Fix getter-setter test.
* Fix getter-setter-multi test.
* Fix nested-jvp test.
* Use [DerivativeMember] attribute to differentiate through member access.
* Clean up.
* More cleanup.
Co-authored-by: Yong He <yhe@nvidia.com>
|
|
* Modified the new type system to support generic differentiable types and added support for differentiating overloaded functions.
* Changed a few asserts to release asserts to avoid unreferenced variable errors
* Fixed a naming issue with TypeWitnessBreadcumb::Flavor::Decl
* Added logic to avoid tracking differentiable types if the module does not use auto-diff or define differentiable types.
* Moved the auto-diff passes to after the specialization step, added a more complex generics test
* Added a generics stress test and fixed AST-side logic. IR side needs some more work
* Added differential getter and setter logic, fixed multiple issues with DifferentiableTypeDictionary, added support for loops and conditions
* Changed differential getters to use pointer types, added getter type checking
* Fixed some bugs related to diff type registration and differential getters
* Removed some superfluous code
* Removed some more unused code.
* Fixed an issue with witness substitution
* Minor fix
Co-authored-by: Yong He <yonghe@outlook.com>
|
|
* Fix regression in check-overload.
* Make sure language server supports partiallyAppliedGenericExpr.
Co-authored-by: Yong He <yhe@nvidia.com>
|
|
A commonly requested feature is to be able to supply only some
of the arguments to a generic explicitly, while allowing the rest
to be inferred. A common example is a function that performs some
kind of conversion:
To convert<To, From>( From fromValue ) { .... }
A user would like to be able to call this operation like:
int i = convert<int>( 1.0f );
but the current Slang type checker requires all or none of the generic
arguments be supplied. Supplying all of the arguments is tedious:
int i = convert<int, float>( 1.0f );
In this case, the `float` type argument is redundant and could be
inferred from context. However, if the user tries to omit the generic
argument list:
int i = convert( 1.0f );
The current type-checker cannot infer the `int` type argument (even if
one might claim it *should* infer based on the desired result type).
This change adds support for the `convert<int>(...)` case, by allowing
a generic to be applied to a prefix of its explicit arguments, and then
inferring the remaining arguments from contextual information when that
"partially applied" generic is applied to value-level arguments.
Most of the changes are just plumbing: adding the notion of a partially
applied generic and then supporting them during overload resolution.
A single test case is included that covers the `convert`-style use case.
It is likely that more testing is needed to cover failure modes of this
feature.
|
|
* Multi parameter `__subscript`
* Fix.
* Fix bugs.
* Fix.
Co-authored-by: Yong He <yhe@nvidia.com>
|
|
|
|
* Add `none` literal that is convertible to `Optional`.
* Fix cpu code gen.
* Include vk and cpu test for is-as operator test.
* Inline comparison operators.
Co-authored-by: Yong He <yhe@nvidia.com>
|
|
* `is` and `as` operator and `Optional<T>`.
* Fix.
Co-authored-by: Yong He <yhe@nvidia.com>
|
|
|
|
* Support `class` types.
* Ignore class-keyword test
* Fix codereview comments and warnings.
Co-authored-by: Yong He <yhe@nvidia.com>
|
|
arithmetic. Also added type-checking during the semantic stage. (#2303)
* Added JVPTranscriber to handle differentiation of load, store, var, param and return instructions, as well as conversion of data and function types
* Changed class names to be more in line with convention. Added correct type checking for __jvp() and verified that simple calls with only loads and stores are processed correctly
* Added logic to differentiate basic arithmetic and literals inside IRConstruct and fixed the way parameters are differentiated
Co-authored-by: Yong He <yonghe@outlook.com>
|
|
framework for passes to process them. (#2297)
* Added a decorator to mark functions for forward-mode differentiation
* Fill out support for calls to non-decl values
The existing compiler logic has a few places (semantic checking plus AST-to-IR lowering) where it assumes that function calls (`InvokeExpr`) are only ever made to expressions that resolve to a specific `Decl` (`DeclRefExpr`). This assumption allows semantic checking and lowering code to inspect things like the parameter list of an actual declaration, rather than just the type signature of the callee, and that infrastructure is used to support various features (e.g., default argument values on parameters).
The AST and IR representations themselves have no matching requirement, and the places where the more general case of call expressions would need to be supported were relatively clear in the code. This change attempts to add suitable logic into each of those places.
Note that this change does *not* surface any valid way to form input code that would cause these new code paths to be executed, so it is entirely possible that there are bugs in the logic as written here. The primary goal of this change is simply to get a sketch of the correct code checked in so that we have something to build on once we have language features that will require this support.
* fixup: warnings-as-errors
* Added parser logic for '__jvp(<fn-name>)' operator
* Fixed issue with missing overload candidate item and added basic parsing test for the __jvp syntax
* Added a blank JVP Auto-diff pass and a pass that replaces 'JVPDerivativeOf' calls with the differentiated function
* Added a couple comments
* Added parameter handling for the JVP pass
Co-authored-by: Theresa Foley <tfoley@nvidia.com>
|
|
* Major language server features.
* Include slangd in binary release.
* Fix compiler issues.
* Fix compiler error.
* Completion resolve.
* Various improvements.
* Update diagnostic test expected output.
* Bug fix for source locations.
* Adjust diagnostic update frequency.
* Update github actions to store artifacts.
* Fix infinite parser loop.
* Fix parser recovery.
* Fix parser recovery.
* Update test.
* Fix test.
* Disable IR gen for language server.
* Allow commit characters in auto completion.
* Fix lookup for invoke exprs.
* More parser robustness fixes.
* update solution file
Co-authored-by: Yong He <yhe@nvidia.com>
|
|
* New language feature: basic error handling.
* Fix.
* Fix `tryCall` encoding according to code review.
Co-authored-by: Yong He <yhe@nvidia.com>
|
|
* Support `[DllImport]`
* Fix.
* Fix.
* Fix array type emit in cpp.
* Fix.
* Fix.
* Fix
Co-authored-by: Yong He <yhe@nvidia.com>
|
|
Read/write resource types (what D3D/HLSL often refer to as UAVs) can be broadly categorized based on whether they require an underlying format (e.g., a `DXGI_FORMAT`) for reads, or not. D3D refers to the ones that require a format as "typed" UAVs (even though a `RWStructuredBuffer<MyData>` is clearly "typed" at the HLSL level). Vulkan refers to these cases as "storage images" and "storage texel buffers."
Under the D3D model, an application does not have to specify the exact format for a formatted/"typed" UAV in order for loads to work, but it *does* need to specify if an HLSL resource with a declared `float` or vector-of-`float` element type will be backed by data with a `*_UNORM` or `*_SNORM` format. This is where the `unorm` and `snorm` type modifiers come in.
Superficially, it might seem that adding this feature to the Slang compiler is "just" a matter of adding the two modifiers, which is easily done with a pair of one-line `syntax` declarations in `core.meta.slang` plus the corresponding AST node types.
Unfortunately the superficial view misses the detail that, to date, Slang has not had any support for *type modifiers* at all, and has only supported *declaration modifiers*. The distinction has so far not mattered, even with modifiers like `const` because, e.g., the difference between a "`const` array of `float`" and an "array of `const float`" doesn't really matter.
So, adding these two modifiers required introducing a lot of infrastructure along the way. Let's walk through what needed to happen:
* As described above, the actual `syntax` was added easily in the Slang stdlib
* I added a new subclass of `Modifier` for `TypeModifier`s in the AST, and added the AST nodes for `unorm` and `snorm` as subclasses of that.
* In order to syntactically support modifiers applied to types (e.g., `unorm float`), I needed to add a `ModifiedTypeExpr` subclass of `Expr` that represents a base type expression with one or more modifiers applied
* The parser needed some subtle new logic. There are two main cases where type modifiers will come up:
1. In contexts where we might be parsing a declaration (e.g., `const unorm float a`), we need to support a list of modifiers that might freely mix type modifiers and "declaration modifiers" which are not intended to apply to types. In this case we need to split the lis tof modifiers into the type-related ones and the declaration-related ones, and attach each subset to the appropriate place. This is very important for features like C-style pointers, where in `static const float* a;`, the `static` modifier applies to the entire declaration of `a`, but the `const` modifier *only* applies to the `float` type specifier, and *not* to the outer pointer type (the actual type of `a`).
2. In contexts where we are not parsing a declaration (e.g., a generic type argument), we need to support a list of modifiers and appy them *all* to the type specifier being parsed, even if some of them might not be appropriate.
* While working in the parser I implemented a certain amount of unrelated cleanup for code that was using raw `Modifier*`s to represent lists of modifiers, instead of the purpose-built `Modifiers` type.
* The `_parseGenericArg` case needed specific work, because it is an important case in the grammar where we need to parse *either* a type expression or a value exprssion, but cannot easily predict which we will see. The fix implemented for now is to always try to parse modifiers and, if we see any, to assume we are in the type case. Because of the rules for how modifiers in a C-like language inhere to the type specifier (and not necessarily the entire type), we need to refactor some of the type expression parsing routines to support parsing a "suffix" of a type expression.
* Note: I decided to be conservative and only make these changes in `_parseGenericArg` because that is place that is *needed* in order for user code with `unorm`/`snorm` to work, but in practice a user could still confuse our parser by using type modifiers as part of a cast (e.g., `x = (unorm float)y;`). While there is currently no reason why a user should want to do this, it *does* suggest that we need to be prepared to see type modifiers in other ambiguous "expression or type?" contexts. We have so far preferred to avoid looking up built-in syntax declarations like modifiers in expression contexts, because we want to allow users to create variable names that might conflict with some of the more surprising modifier keywords in HLSL (e.g., both `triangle` and `sample` are modifier keyword). A nuanced strategy may be required when we get around to closing this gap (which will be needed around when we want full pointer support, since a cast like `(const SomeType*)somePtr` is pretty common).
* In semantic checking, we now need a `visitModifiedTypeExpr`, which visits the base expression to produce a `Type` and then checks each of the `Modifier`s attached to it. During this process we need to translate the AST-level `Modifier`s into something that can exist properly in the universe of `Type`s. We introduce a `ModifiedType` subclass of `Type`, distinct from the `ModifiedTypeExpr` subclass of `Expr`. Furthermore, we introduce a `ModifierVal` subclass of `Val`, distinct from `Modifier`/`TypeModifier`.
* One unfortunate thing here is that it means we have both, e.g., `UNormModifier` to represent the parsed syntax, and `UNormModifierVal` to represent the `Type`/`Val`-level representation of the same concept. It is quite likely that we are near the point where we can/should consider having two distinct AST representations: one for freshly-parsed ASTs and one for semantically-checked ASTs. The `Type`/`Val` hierarchy clearly belongs to the latter.
* No actual semantic checking is currently being applied to the `unorm` and `snorm` modifiers, although we should in principle check that they are only being applied to `float` and vector-of-`float` types.
* In an attempt to simplify some of the creation logic and build a tiny bit of reusable infrastructure, I went ahead and added the skeleton of a dedupe-caching system in `ASTBuilder` so that we can easily ensure only a single `UNormModifierVal` and a single `SNormModifierVal` ever get created inside the scope of a single builder.
* TODO: Thinking about this, I'm now worried the deduplication does not mean I can make the simplifications I currently do in semantic checking by assuming that any two `UNormModifierVal`s will be pointer-identical. This is because we do not currently (IIRC) have the required "bottleneck" in the compiler where all ASTs get serialized after initial checking, and then deserialized when `import`ed into a downstream module, so that every AST node during a checking step comes from a single `ASTBuilder`. Hmm...
* If we can rely on deduplication to do its thing, then the `Val` and `Type` implementations of modifiers can be relatively simple.
* TODO: One issue here is that the equality comparison for `ModifiedType` currently checks for the same base type and the same modifiers in the same order. This works for now when we only have a small number of type modifiers and any given type will hae at most one, but in the longer run it relies on us to implement some kind of canonicalization scheme, which would both ensure that between `Modified(T, {A, B})` and `Modified(T, {B, A})` only one is allowed (that is, a canonical ordering on modifiers), and that we do not allow `Modified(Modified(T, {A}), {B})`.
* TODO: One other issues is that the `ModifiedType` case does not currently interact correctly with the `as()`-based casting for types (whereas that operation *does* interact in a semantically-correct fashion with `typedef`s). Fixing this issue in a robust way really depends on us re-architecting the `Type` system so that *any* `Type` can have modifiers attached, with modifiers affecting type identity/deduplication.
* The key place where `ModifiedType` creates a complication in semantic checking is type conversion/coercion. A user is likely to declare a `RWTexture2D<unorm float>`, fetch from it (producing a value of type `unorm float`) and then assign the result to a `float` variable, prompting for a conversion from `unorm float` to `float` (because they are distinct `Type`s).
* We handle this case in the core `_coerce()` operation by checking if either `toType` or `fromType` is a `ModifiedType`. If *either* one is a modified type, we apply logic to check for modifiers that are present on one and not the other. Basically we check which modifiers need to be "dropped" and which need to be "added" during conversion, and validate that these modifiers *can* be dropped/added without creating a semantic error. The only type modifiers we support right now *can* be dropped/added like this, so we are fine.
* TODO: When we add more complete pointer support, we could need logic here to validate when casts between, e.g., `const int*` and `int*` should/shouldn't be allowed.
* Note: Even opening the door to type modifiers at all creates the same kind of challenges for user-defined generic types (and functions!) since `MyType<int>` and `MyType<const int>` are distinct instantiations in a future where we support `const` as a type modifier. We *may* need to plan to restrict where modified types can be used, so that certain built-in generic types support modified types as arguments, but user-defined types don't (or at least might need to opt-in to get support).
* The result of a `_coerce()` that drops/adds modifiers is a `ModifierCastExpr`, which is a kind of no-op AST node that merely expresses that the conversion is allowed and valid.
* In IR lowering we currently do the simple thing and translate a `ModifiedType` to a distinct IR node called `AttributedType`.
* The change in terminology from "modifier" to "attribute" is to follow the way that these kinds of modifiers best map to the `IRAttr` case in the IR (rather than the `IRDecoration` case). We probably ought to do a careful terminology scrub here, because having this terminology mismatch between IR and AST could be a source of confusion.
* TODO: In principle, using `IRAttributedType` creates the same basic problems as using `ModifiedType`: code that is usin `as()` or similar operations to check for a specific subclass of `IRType` may not see the case they were looking for due to use of `IRAttributedType`.
* Initially I had hoped to avoid the problem by having the `IRAttr`s be attached directly as operands to an otherwise-ordinary `IRType`. E.g., a lowered `unorm float4` would be an `IRVectorType` with an "extra" operand that is an `IRUNormAttr`, something like: `Vector<Float, 4, UNorm>`. This sounds great (and looks great!), but runs into the problem that it is incompatible with the way we currently represent things like generic type parameters. A generic type parameter `T` is represented as an `IRParam`, and it does *not* make sense to have an additional `IRParam` to represent `const T` or `unorm T`, etc.
* The Right Way to solve this stuff at both the AST and IR levels is to avoid passing around bare `Type*` or `IRType*` in general, and instead use a value type that implements the needed policy more directly: something like a `TypeHolder` or `IRTypeHolder` (placeholder name). The `*Holder` type would abstract over the various "wrapper" nodes required to store all the additional data like attributes but, importantly, would *not* allow that extra information to be dropped or lost during operations like casting (e.g., note how the current `Type` implementation of `as()` loses information on `typedef` names, making our error messages slightly worse). This is actually quite similar to how we currently use the `DeclRef<T>` system to allow working with what is *usually* a `T*` under the hood, but in a way that ensures we don't lose track of any generic substitution information.
* During C-like code emit we have a process that turns an `IRType` into a chain of declarators as needed to emit a C-like declaration with pointers, arrays, etc. The `IRAttributedType` case needs to get folded into this logic. Basically, when we see an `IRAttributedType` we immediately emit any modifiers that are required to be in a prefix position, then recursively emit the underlying type with an extra layer of declarator that tracks the modifiers, so that we can emit any modifiers that should be placed in a postfix position *after* the type. As a specific example, our C/C++ back-end would want to use the postifx option to handle `const`, because then it can properly emit stuff like `int const * const *` and not the incorrect `const const int**`.
* The HLSL emit logic overrides the prefix case for handling type attributes, and uses it to emit `unorm` and `snorm` where they occur.
* One unfortunate detail is that (apparently) some downstream HLSL compilers do not allow the `unorm`/`snorm` modifiers to apply to `vector<float, *>` types, even though that should be semantically valid. Instead, they only support `float`, `float2`, `float3`, and `float4` explicitly. To work around this issue, we go ahead and change our HLSL emit logic so that when we encountered 1-to-4 component vectors of `float`, `int`, or `uint` we emit the type name using the typical HLSL shorthand. This is actually a signficicant change in our HLSL output, but it both seemed like a good fix to have anyway, and was also the only obvious way to address the downstream parser shortcomings without a massive kludge.
* As a result of this change the `half-texture.slang` test broke, since it was using raw HLSL as the expected output. I changed the test to do a DXIL comparison instead, which is our preferred way of testing cross-compilation behavior (since it is more robust in the face of small changes to our source output).
|
|
* Add debug symbols for release build.
* Hack to try and capture failing compilation.
* Typo fix for capture hack.
* Specify return type on lambdas.
* Added const.
* Try breakpoint.
* Up count
* Let's capture everything so we can valgrind.
* Disable always writing repros.
* Make Scope non RefCounted.
* Fix issue with not serializing Scope.
* More comments around changes to Scope.
Remove Scope* from serialization.
* Remove code used for testing original issue.
|
|
The `OverloadedExpr` type didn't provide a default value for its field:
Name* name;
This led to a null-pointer crash in the logic that deals with synthesizing interface requirements because it creates an `OverloadedExpr` but doesn't initialize the field.
This change makes two fixes:
1. The logic in the synthesis path actually initializes `name` so that it can feed into any downstream error messages
2. The `OverloadedExpr` declaration now includes an initial value for `name` so that it will at least be null instead of garbage if we slip up again
|
|
The basic feature here is the ability to use the `&` operator to produce the conjunction/intersection of two interfaces. That is, you can have interfaces:
interface IFirst { int getFirst(); }
interface ISecond { int getSecoond(); }
and if you need a generic function where the type parameter `T` must conform to *both* of these interfaces, you express that by constraining the parameter to the intersection of the interfaces:
void someFunction<T : IFirst & ISecond>(T value) { ... }
Without this feature, the main alternative an application would have is to define an intermediate interface, like:
interface IBoth : IFirst, ISecond {}
Forcing users to deal with an intermediate interface creates more work for type authors (they need to remember to inherit from the right combined interface(s)), or for `extension` authors (when you add `ISecond` to a type that used to just support `IFirst`, you had better also add `IBoth`). In the worst case, a family of N related "leaf" interfaces would give rise to an exponential number of intermediate interfaces to represnt the possible combinations.
A conjunction like `IFirst & ISecond` is officially its own type, and can be used to declare a type alias:
typealias IBoth = IFirst & ISecond;
This change only includes the first pass of work on this feature, so there are several caveats to be aware of:
* Using a conjunction as part of an inheritance clause is not yet supported (e.g., `struct X : IFirst & ISecond`). This is true even if the conjunction was introduced by an intermediate `typealias`
* The `&` syntax introduced here is only parsed in places where only a type (not an expression) is possible. This means you cannot do things like cast to a conjunction with `(IFirst & ISecond)(someValue)`.
* This work *should* apply to conjunctions of more than two interfaces (like `IA & IB & IC`) but that has not yet been tested
* In the long run it may be sensible to allow conjunctions that use concrete types, but we really ought to have the semantic checking logic rule that out for now.
* During testing, I encountered compiler crashes when trying to use this feature together with `property` declarations. Further investigation and debugging is called for.
* The handling of conjunction types is currently incomplete, in that there are many equivalences the compiler does not yet understand. For example, it is clear that `IA & IB` is equivalent to `IB & IA`, but the compiler currently does not understand this and will treat them as different types. A deeper implementation approach is called for.
* Conjunctions are currently only supported for generic type parameter constraints, when performing full specialization. Use of conjunctions for existential-type value parameters or with dynamic dispatch is not yet supported.
|
|
* #include an absolute path didn't work - because paths were taken to always be relative.
* Make AST serialization types, marker include _AST_. Ie SLANG_CLASS -> SLANG_AST_CLASS and SLANG_ABSTRACT_CLASS -> SLANG_ABSTRACT_AST_CLASS
|
|
* Add a ASTBuilder to a Module
Only construct on valid ASTBuilder (was being called on nullptr on occassion)
* Add nodes to ASTBuilder.
* Compiles with RefPtr removed from AST node types.
* Initialize all AST node pointer variables in headers to nullptr;
* Initialize AST node variables as nullptr.
Make ASTBuilder keep a ref on node types.
Make SyntaxParseCallback returns a NodeBase
* Don't release canonicalType on dtor (managed by ASTBuilder).
* Give ASTBuilders a name and id, to help in debugging.
For now destroy the session TypeCache, to stop it holding things released when the compile request destroys ASTBuilders.
* Moved the TypeCheckingCache over to Linkage from Session.
* NodeBase no longer derived from RefObject.
* Only add/dtor nodes that need destruction.
First pass compile on linux.
|
|
* First steps toward inheritance for struct types
This change adds the ability for a `struct` type to declare a base type that is another `struct`:
```hlsl
struct Base
{
int baseMember;
}
struct Derived : Base
{
int derivedMember;
}
```
The semantics of the feature are that code like the above desugars into code like:
```hlsl
struct Base
{
int baseMember;
}
struct Derived
{
Base _base;
int derivedMember;
}
```
At points where a member from the base type is being projected out, or the value is being implicitly cast to the base type, the compiler transforms the code to reference the implicitly-generated `_base` member. That means code like this:
```hlsl
void f(Base b);
...
Derived d = ...;
int x = d.baseMember;
f(d);
```
gets transformed into a form like this:
```hlsl
void f(Base b);
...
Derived d = ...;
int x = d._base.baseMember;
f(d._base);
```
Note that as a result of this choice, the behavior when passing a `Derived` value to a function that expects a `Base` (including to inherited member functions) is that of "object shearing" from the C++ world: the called function can only "see" the `Base` part of the argument, and any operations performed on it will behave as if the value was indeed a `Base`. There is no polymorphism going on because Slang doesn't currently have `virtual` methods.
In an attempt to work toward inheritance being a robust feature, this change adds a bunch of more detailed logic for checking the bases of various declarations:
* An `interface` declaration is only allowed to inherit from other `interface`s
* An `extension` declaration can only introduce inheritance from `interface`s
* A `struct` declaration can only inherit from at most one other `struct`, and that `struct` must be the first entry in the list of bases
This change also adds a mechanism to control whether a `struct` or `interface` in one module can inherit from a `struct` or `interface` declared in another module:
* If the base declaration is marked `[open]`, then the inheritance is allowed
* If the base declaration is marked `[sealed]`, then the inheritance is allowed
* If it is not marked otherwise, a `struct` is implicitly `[sealed]`
* If it is not marked otherwise, an `interface` is implicitly `[open]`
These seem like reasonable defaults. In order to safeguard the standard library a bit, the interfaces for builtin types have been marked `[sealed]` to make sure that a user cannot declare a `struct` and then mark it as a `BuiltinFloatingPointType`. This step should bring us a bit closer to being able to document and expose these interfaces for built-in types so that users can write code that is generic over them.
There are some big caveats with this work, such that it really only represents a stepping-stone toward a usable inheritance feature. The most important caveats are:
* If a `Derived` type tries to conform to an interface, such that one or more interface requirements are satisfied with members inherited from the `Base` type, that is likely to cause a crash or incorrect code generation.
* If a `Derived` type tries to inherit from a `Base` type that conforms to one or more interfaces, the witness table generated for the conformance of `Derived` to that interface is likely to lead to a crash or incorrect code generation.
It is clear that solving both of those issues will be necessary before we can really promote `struct` inheritance as a feature for users to try out.
* fixup: trying to appease clang error
* fixups: review feedback
|
|
* Working matrix swizzle.
Supports one and zero indexing and multiple elements.
Performs semantic checking of the swizzle. Matrix swizzles are
transformed into a vector of indexing operations during lowering to the
IR.
This change does not handle matrix swizzle as lvalues.
* Renaming
* Added missing semicolon
* Initialize variable for gcc
* Added the expect file for diagnostics
* Matrix swizzle updated per PR feedback
* Stylistic fix
* Formatting fixes
* Fix compiling with AST change.
Change indentation.
Co-authored-by: jsmall-nvidia <jsmall@nvidia.com>
|
|
* Fields from upper to lower case in slang-ast-decl.h
* Lower camel field names in slang-ast-stmt.h
* Fix fields in slang-ast-expr.h
* slang-ast-type.h make fields lowerCamel.
* slang-ast-base.h members functions lowerCamel.
* Method names in slang-ast-type.h to lowerCamel.
* GetCanonicalType -> getCanonicalType
* Substitute -> substitute
* Equals -> equals
ToString -> toString
* ParentDecl -> parentDecl
Members -> members
|
|
SLANG_CLASS, to simplify macro injection and not require macro redefinition in each file. (#1345)
|
|
* Extractor builds without any reference to syntax (as it will be helping to produce this!).
* Change macros to include the super class.
* WIP replacing defs files.
* Added indexOf(const UnownedSubString& in) to UnownedSubString.
Refactored extractor
* Output a macro for each type with the extracted info - can be used during injection in class
* Simplify the header file - as can get super type and last from macro now
* Store the 'origin' of a definition
* Some small tidy ups to the extractor.
* Improve comments on the extractor options.
* Made CPPExtractor own SourceOrigins
* Small fixes around SourceOrigin.
* Small tidy up around macroOrign
* WIP Visitor seems now to work correctly.
Split out types used by ast into slang-ast-support-types.h
* Fix remaining problems with C++ extractor being used with AST nodes.
Add CountOf to extractor type ids.
Added ReflectClassInfo::getInfo to turn an ASTNodeType into a ReflectClassInfo
* Fix compiling on linux.
Fix typo in memset.
* Small tidy up around comments/layout.
Moved NodeBase casting to NodeBase.
* Make premake generate project that builds with cpp-extractor for AST.
* Get the source directory from the filter in premake.
* Fix typo in source path
* Explicitly set the source path for premake generation for AST.
* Special case handling of override to apease Clang.
* Use a more general way to find the slang-ast-reflect.h file to run the extractor.
* Appveyor is not triggering slang-cpp-extractor - try putting dependson together.
* Put building slang-cpp-extractor first.
* Disable some project options to stop MSBuild producing internal compiler errors.
* Try reordering the projects in premake5.lua
* Hack to try and make slang-cpp-extractor built on appveyor.
* Disable flags - not required for MSBuild on appveyor.
* Disable flags not required for build on AppVeyor.
* Updated Visual Studio projects with slang-cpp-extractor.
* Added Visual Studio slang-cpp-extractor project.
|
