summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/source/slang/lower.cpp
AgeCommit message (Collapse)Author
2017-07-08Fully parse function bodies, even in "rewriter" modeTim Foley
This is in anticipation of needing to have more complete knowledge to be able to handle user code that `import`s library functionality. The big picture of this change is just to remove the `UnparsedStmt` class that was used to hold the bodies of user functions as opaque token streams, and thus to let the full parser and compiler loose on that code. That is the easy part, of course, and the hard part is all the fixes that this requires in the rest of the compielr to make this even remotely work. Subsequent commit address a lot of other issues, so this particular commit mostly represents work-in-progress. One detail is that this change puts a conditional around nearly every diagnostic message in `check.cpp` to suppress thing when in rewriter mode. I have yet to check how that works out if there are errors in anything we actually need to understand for the purposes of generating reflection data.
2017-07-07Eliminate `typedef`s when lowering to GLSLTim Foley
GLSL doesn't support `typedef` declarations. The lowering code already lowered any named types (references to `typedef`s) to their underlying definition when targetting GLSL. This changes makes sure that we also don't generate any lowered output for `typedef` declarations in the source program.
2017-07-07Fix up visitor approach.Tim Foley
The existing code used a catch-all `visit()` method, and then relied on overloading to find the right version (allowing fallback to a `visit()` method taking a base-class parameter). This approach works, but has some big down-sides: - When browsing the code, you have a bunch of identically-named methods, and it can be hard to find the one you want. - It is impossible to use inheritance to implement fallback for `visit()` methods, because *any* method in the derived class with that name hides *all* methods with the same name in a base class This change makes the `visit()` methods use the name of the corresponding syntax class, and then has visitors inherit the fallback methods they need from the base visitor template class.
2017-07-06More exhaustive loweringTim Foley
- Handle all statement cases explicitly (rather than falling back to the "structural recursion" mess) - Handle back-references from child statements to their parents
2017-07-06Add missing declaration types to lowering pass.Tim Foley
Most of these are cases we don't expect to encounter, but the big missing one was `TypeDefDecl`.
2017-07-06Fix many warnings-as-errors issues.Tim Foley
The code should now compile cleanly with warnings as errors for VS2015 with `W3`. Most of the changes had to do with propagating a real pointer-sized integer type through code that had been using `int`.
2017-07-06Start to support cross-compilation via "lowering" passTim Foley
- The big change here is the introduction of a "lowering" pass that takes an input AST from the semantic checker, and produces an output AST suitable for emitting. The intention is that he lowering pass is responsible for: - Stripping out unused code (when we have enough information to do so), by only outputting declarations that are transitively references from an entry point - When cross-compiling to GLSL, generating a suitable `void main()` entry point to wrap the user-written entry-point function - (Eventually) legalizing types in the program, by scalarizing aggregate types that mix uniform and resource types - (Eventually) instantiating generic declarations so that the resulting code only deals with fully specialized declarations - (Eventually) de-sugaring OOP constructs into basic "structs and functions" form - (Eventually) instantiating code that depends on interface types at the concrete types chosen - It is clear that there is still a lot of work to be done there, to this change is really about getting infrastructure in place without breaking the existing test cases. - One cleanup here is that we get rid of the idea of whole-translation-unit output, since that was specific to HLSL output, and there is really no strong reason for keeping it. Users should now just ask for the output for each entry point that they wanted to generate. - The biggest source of complexity for the lowering process is that it needs to produce the same AST structure as the input, to deal with the complexity of the rewriter case. That is, we need the output to be able to reproduce the input exactly in the case where we are rewriting and nothing needs to change, so the output format needs at least the degrees of freedom of the input. - As a result, we end up having to distinguish "rewriter" and "full" modes in both lowering and code-emit steps, so that we can react appropriately. - Generating a GLSL `main()` also adds a lot of complexity. Right now I'm using the simplest approach, where we always output the Slang/HLSL entry point as an ordinary function (as written) and then emit a simple GLSL `main()` to call it. I generate globals for all the shader inputs/outputs (these need to be scalarized and have explicit `location`s attached), and then collect these into the `struct` types of the original parameters as needed. - This approach will start to have some major down-sides once we have to deal with "arrayed" input/output - A long-term question here is how to replace entry-point parameter types with scalarized and/or "transposed" versions, while still letting the original code work as written (including copying those inputs to temporary arrays) - Split `BlockStatementSyntaxNode` into: - `BlockStmt` which just provides a scope around a `body` statement - `SeqStmt` which just allows multiple statements to be treated as one - Change how we emit `for` loops, to deal with the case where the initialization part might expand into multiple statements - Basically `for(A;B;C) {D}` becomes `{A; for(;B;C) {D}}`, so we can handle arbitrary statements for `A` - As an additional wrinkle, when we are rewriting HLSL, we just generate `A; for(;B;C) {D}` to deal with the broken scoping there - This change is needed because the lowering pass was sometimes expanding the original initialization statement `A` into a block `{A}`. Certainly if it declared multiple variables we'd need to handle it, and this seemed the easiest way - A more significant challenge for lowering would come if/when we ever wanted to support true short-circuiting behavior for `&&` and `||` - For right now I'm not changing the behavior of the "rewriter" mode, so we still have `UnparsedStmt` instances being generated, but it is clear that eventually we need to parse *all* input, even if we can't type-check 100% of it. This is required so that we can rewrite user code that might refer to a shader input with interface type.