summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/source/slang/expr-defs.h
AgeCommit message (Collapse)Author
2017-07-08Revise how hidden implicit casts are recognized.Tim Foley
The old approach used an `isRewriter` flag in the emit logic, but I kind of need that flag to go away. Instead, I now how the semantic checking pass detect whether an implicitly-generated type cast is in rewriter code, and if so it uses the new `HiddenImplicitCastExpr` AST node. The emit logic then looks for that specific node and eliminates it.
2017-07-08Fully parse function bodies, even in "rewriter" modeTim Foley
This is in anticipation of needing to have more complete knowledge to be able to handle user code that `import`s library functionality. The big picture of this change is just to remove the `UnparsedStmt` class that was used to hold the bodies of user functions as opaque token streams, and thus to let the full parser and compiler loose on that code. That is the easy part, of course, and the hard part is all the fixes that this requires in the rest of the compielr to make this even remotely work. Subsequent commit address a lot of other issues, so this particular commit mostly represents work-in-progress. One detail is that this change puts a conditional around nearly every diagnostic message in `check.cpp` to suppress thing when in rewriter mode. I have yet to check how that works out if there are errors in anything we actually need to understand for the purposes of generating reflection data.
2017-07-06Start to support cross-compilation via "lowering" passTim Foley
- The big change here is the introduction of a "lowering" pass that takes an input AST from the semantic checker, and produces an output AST suitable for emitting. The intention is that he lowering pass is responsible for: - Stripping out unused code (when we have enough information to do so), by only outputting declarations that are transitively references from an entry point - When cross-compiling to GLSL, generating a suitable `void main()` entry point to wrap the user-written entry-point function - (Eventually) legalizing types in the program, by scalarizing aggregate types that mix uniform and resource types - (Eventually) instantiating generic declarations so that the resulting code only deals with fully specialized declarations - (Eventually) de-sugaring OOP constructs into basic "structs and functions" form - (Eventually) instantiating code that depends on interface types at the concrete types chosen - It is clear that there is still a lot of work to be done there, to this change is really about getting infrastructure in place without breaking the existing test cases. - One cleanup here is that we get rid of the idea of whole-translation-unit output, since that was specific to HLSL output, and there is really no strong reason for keeping it. Users should now just ask for the output for each entry point that they wanted to generate. - The biggest source of complexity for the lowering process is that it needs to produce the same AST structure as the input, to deal with the complexity of the rewriter case. That is, we need the output to be able to reproduce the input exactly in the case where we are rewriting and nothing needs to change, so the output format needs at least the degrees of freedom of the input. - As a result, we end up having to distinguish "rewriter" and "full" modes in both lowering and code-emit steps, so that we can react appropriately. - Generating a GLSL `main()` also adds a lot of complexity. Right now I'm using the simplest approach, where we always output the Slang/HLSL entry point as an ordinary function (as written) and then emit a simple GLSL `main()` to call it. I generate globals for all the shader inputs/outputs (these need to be scalarized and have explicit `location`s attached), and then collect these into the `struct` types of the original parameters as needed. - This approach will start to have some major down-sides once we have to deal with "arrayed" input/output - A long-term question here is how to replace entry-point parameter types with scalarized and/or "transposed" versions, while still letting the original code work as written (including copying those inputs to temporary arrays) - Split `BlockStatementSyntaxNode` into: - `BlockStmt` which just provides a scope around a `body` statement - `SeqStmt` which just allows multiple statements to be treated as one - Change how we emit `for` loops, to deal with the case where the initialization part might expand into multiple statements - Basically `for(A;B;C) {D}` becomes `{A; for(;B;C) {D}}`, so we can handle arbitrary statements for `A` - As an additional wrinkle, when we are rewriting HLSL, we just generate `A; for(;B;C) {D}` to deal with the broken scoping there - This change is needed because the lowering pass was sometimes expanding the original initialization statement `A` into a block `{A}`. Certainly if it declared multiple variables we'd need to handle it, and this seemed the easiest way - A more significant challenge for lowering would come if/when we ever wanted to support true short-circuiting behavior for `&&` and `||` - For right now I'm not changing the behavior of the "rewriter" mode, so we still have `UnparsedStmt` instances being generated, but it is clear that eventually we need to parse *all* input, even if we can't type-check 100% of it. This is required so that we can rewrite user code that might refer to a shader input with interface type.
2017-06-30Add meta-definitions for AST typesTim Foley
- The big change here is that all the definitions for syntax-node classes have been macro-ized, to that we can do light metaprogramming over them - The use of macros for this has big down-sides, but I'm not quite ready to do anything more heavy-weight right now - The macro-ized definitions can be included multiple times, to generate different declarations/code as needed - The first example of using this meta-programming facility is a new visitor system - The actual visitor base classes and the dispatch logic are all generated from the meta-files - There was only one visitor left in the code: the semantics checker, so that was ported to the new system. - All current test cases pass, so *of course* that means all is well.